Удачно отдохнуть!
Have a nice vacation!
26.03.08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> написал(а):
>
>
> Я буду отсутствовать на работе начиная с 26.03.2008 и не вернусь до
> 03.04.2008.
>
> Ограничено доступен.
> По возвращении я отвечу на ваше сообщение.
> _
On Mar 26, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:
> Most users make sure their vacation program does not auto-respond to
> mailinglist mails, especially not to the list itself. On some
> mailinglists, it is grounds for immediate removal.
Indeed-- properly written autoresponders or "vacation" p
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:22:09AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > What is all this gibberish?
>
> Out of office autoresponder post using Cyrillic typeface, written in a
> Russian language.
Which is relatively easy to understand if you just cut-n-paste the text
into translate.google.com. Prov
That is Cyrillic (Russian), KOIR-8 code.
This guys will be out of office between 26.3.2008 - 3.4.2008. Then he will
answer.
(To whom it concerns )
Marshall Dudley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ? ? ?? ?? ??? ? 26.03.20
On Mar 26, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Marshall Dudley wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> ? ? ?? ?? ??? ? 26.03.2008 ? ?? ??? ??
>> 03.04.2008.
>>
>> ?? .
>> ?? ??? ? ?? ?? ?.
>> ___
>> Help
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Я буду отсутствовать на работе начиная с 26.03.2008 и не вернусь до
>> 03.04.2008.
>> Ограничено доступен. По возвращении я отвечу на ваше сообщение.
> What is all this gibberish?
> Marshall
His text uses the Cyrillic KOI8-R encoding. If your MUA uses
the western
Vasiliy is Russian :-P
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 13:00 -0400, Marshall Dudley wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ? ? ?? ?? ??? ? 26.03.2008 ? ?? ??? ??
> > 03.04.2008.
> >
> > ?? .
> > ?? ??? ? ?? ?? ?.
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ? ? ?? ?? ??? ? 26.03.2008 ? ?? ??? ??
> 03.04.2008.
>
> ?? .
> ?? ??? ? ?? ?? ?.
> ___
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clama
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Brandon Perry wrote:
> This is what gets me:
>
> Can't connect to port 80 of host db.us.clamav.net (IP:
> 206.154.202.13)
> Trying host db.us.clamav.net (206.154.203.213)...
> Downloading daily-6363.cdiff [100%]
> Downloading daily-6364.cdiff [100%]
> D
On Mar 26, 2008, at 9:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Я буду отсутствовать на работе начиная с 26.03.2008 и не вернусь до
> 03.04.2008.
>
> Ограничено доступен.
> По возвращении я отвечу на ваше сообщение.
Enjoy your time off, Vasiliy :)
dp
___
H
Я буду отсутствовать на работе начиная с 26.03.2008 и не вернусь до
03.04.2008.
Ограничено доступен.
По возвращении я отвечу на ваше сообщение.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/c
Nope. You're current. So that isn't the issue.
Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mar 26, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Henrik K wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:46:31AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>>
>>> Until today you made no mention of static linking in this thread, if
>>> you had you may have had different answers ;)
>>
>> The question was all about linking and can have no ot
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:46:31AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> >
> > Until today you made no mention of static linking in this thread, if
> > you had you may have had different answers ;)
>
> The question was all about linking and can have no other subtext,
> premise, or context, and was bas
This is what gets me:
Can't connect to port 80 of host db.us.clamav.net (IP:
206.154.202.13)
Trying host db.us.clamav.net (206.154.203.213)...
Downloading daily-6363.cdiff [100%]
Downloading daily-6364.cdiff [100%]
Downloading daily-6365.cdiff [100%]
nonblock_connect: conn
On Mar 26, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> I often get numerous log messages about errors connecting to the
> clamav
> database servers. Here is an extract from a recent log (times are EDT
> = UTC - 0400):
This has been so bad the last couple weeks that I changed from
db.us.clamav.net
On Mar 26, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Rob MacGregor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Dennis Peterson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> And I wonder still if as delivered it can be built statically.
>> Obviously if it is only dynamically linked it will not survive a
>> ClamAV upgrade. At no time
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is your clam AV version up to date?
Not very far behind, I should imagine.
> I sometimes see similar messages
> when I"m more than one levelset behind and the mirrors have changed.
> What does clamscan -V and freshclam -V reveal?
# clamscan -V
Clam
Is your clam AV version up to date? I sometimes see similar messages when I"m
more than one levelset behind and the mirrors have changed. What does
clamscan -V and freshclam -V reveal?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And I wonder still if as delivered it can be built statically.
> Obviously if it is only dynamically linked it will not survive a
> ClamAV upgrade. At no time did I mention using clamd as a option. It
> was such a s
I often get numerous log messages about errors connecting to the clamav
database servers. Here is an extract from a recent log (times are EDT
= UTC - 0400):
Last ClamAV update process started at Tue Mar 25 04:31:19 2008
Last Status:
main.cvd is up to date (version: 45, sigs: 169676, f-l
On Mar 26, 2008, at 7:55 AM, Rob MacGregor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Dennis Peterson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You learned from that answer that as distributed it can be statically
>> linked to libclamav? I shall read it again and again until I find
>> that
>> elusive fac
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You learned from that answer that as distributed it can be statically
> linked to libclamav? I shall read it again and again until I find that
> elusive factoid.
No, you asked if HAVP had to be rebuild when you upgrad
On Mar 26, 2008, at 4:33 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>
>
> --On 21 March 2008 08:31:11 -0700 Dennis Peterson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> And while his answer was correct, it
>> was not helpful.
>
> It did very precisely answer the only question that you asked.
>
You learned from that answer
--On 21 March 2008 08:31:11 -0700 Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> And while his answer was correct, it
> was not helpful.
It did very precisely answer the only question that you asked.
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
x3148
_
25 matches
Mail list logo
