On 21/01/2008, at 4:45 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> James Brown wrote:
>
>>
>> Added the above text, but with LogFileMaxSize 0, (without the '#' of
>> course!).
>>
>> ran /usr/local/bin/freshclam
>>
>> still got a LOGGING DISABLED error in freshclam.log
>>
>> Thanks Dennis & Bill,
>
> Did you sto
James Brown wrote:
>
> Added the above text, but with LogFileMaxSize 0, (without the '#' of
> course!).
>
> ran /usr/local/bin/freshclam
>
> still got a LOGGING DISABLED error in freshclam.log
>
> Thanks Dennis & Bill,
Did you stop and restart freshclam (assuming you run it as a daemon)?
W
On 21/01/2008, at 4:03 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> James Brown wrote:
>> My freshclam.log only shows entries like:
>>
>> Log size = 11242653, max = 1048576
>> LOGGING DISABLED (Maximal log file size exceeded).
>>
>> How can I increase the max log file size?
>
>
> The current build of ClamAV has
On 21/01/2008, at 4:03 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> James Brown wrote:
>> My freshclam.log only shows entries like:
>>
>> Log size = 11242653, max = 1048576
>> LOGGING DISABLED (Maximal log file size exceeded).
>>
>> How can I increase the max log file size?
>
> The current build of ClamAV has th
James Brown wrote:
> My freshclam.log only shows entries like:
>
> Log size = 11242653, max = 1048576
> LOGGING DISABLED (Maximal log file size exceeded).
>
> How can I increase the max log file size?
The current build of ClamAV has this in the example freshclam.conf file:
# Maximum size of th
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:32:59 +1100, James Brown wrote
> My freshclam.log only shows entries like:
>
> Log size = 11242653, max = 1048576
> LOGGING DISABLED (Maximal log file size exceeded).
>
> How can I increase the max log file size?
>
Try putting something like this in /etc/logrotate.d/fresh
My freshclam.log only shows entries like:
Log size = 11242653, max = 1048576
LOGGING DISABLED (Maximal log file size exceeded).
How can I increase the max log file size?
Thanks,
James.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.
That still seems a bit "over-the-top". Sure, better safe than sorry, but
I wouldn't just blindly delete any exe that I come into contact with
(via email or otherwise). Especially on Linux, you can get archives
zipped into an exe format that are unzipped via unzip -a. That is quite
a common format i
The point raised by Dennis is extremely relevant to this thread. The
exception of course is Linux which runs on the PowerPC or Cell
architecture. Only in that environment would Linux executables have no
effect as the infecting executables are designed for Linux and Windows
running on Intel compat
Sarocet wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Nobody has actually tested the files to see if they are Windows executables
>> that I've
>> seen. It is entirely possible they could be Linux executables. File
>> extensions don't
>> mean much on a Linux system but it seems from this thread a great way
Did you do a sudo freshclam? The repos aren't the latest, but that
doesn't hinder the definitions. If you didn't do sudo freshclam, then
you don't have the latest definitions at all.
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 07:44 +0800, umarzuki mochlis wrote:
> i don't know if it's the latest or not. I just sudo ap
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Nobody has actually tested the files to see if they are Windows executables
> that I've
> seen. It is entirely possible they could be Linux executables. File
> extensions don't
> mean much on a Linux system but it seems from this thread a great way to pass
> around
>
i don't know if it's the latest or not. I just sudo apt-get install it from
ubuntu repo. Kapersky detected it.
On Jan 20, 2008 7:00 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Send clamav-users mailing list submissions to
>clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World W
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:03:14 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The exe files are Windows' executables (applications). Would they do harm to
> Linux? When I tried to open an exe file I was told no application was
> available.
[snip]
Well, my mail server runs on linux, but most of my clients use o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The exe files are Windows' executables (applications). Would they do harm to
> Linux? When I tried to open an exe file I was told no application was
> available.
> What do you have on your pendrive? It seems to be a cross platform problem?
> And Michael L Torrie is very
The exe files are Windows' executables (applications). Would they do harm to
Linux? When I tried to open an exe file I was told no application was
available.
What do you have on your pendrive? It seems to be a cross platform problem?
And Michael L Torrie is very right about vendors being afraid o
umarzuki mochlis wrote:
> I believe g2p3s.exe, t.exe and autorun.inf are some sort of trojan or
> something but calm doesn't seem to detect it.
>
Hi,
Might be worth submitting the files to the following sites and see what
other AV scanners think of it :
http://www.virustotal.com/
http://vir
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:25:32 -0500, Gerard wrote
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:47:57 + (GMT)
> "G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > My personal policy is to delete all files which have names ending in
> > ".exe", and I suggest that everyone should consider that approach.
>
>
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:47:57 + (GMT)
"G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> My personal policy is to delete all files which have names ending in
> ".exe", and I suggest that everyone should consider that approach.
Why? On a none Win32 machine, the chance of such a file causing
pr
Hi there,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 umarzuki mochlis wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo clamscan /media/UM4R
> [sudo] password for umarzuki:
> /media/UM4R/g2p3s.exe: OK
> /media/UM4R/t.exe: OK
> /media/UM4R/smw-1.7-setup.exe: OK
> /media/UM4R/autorun.inf: OK
>
> I believe g2p3s.exe, t.exe and autorun.i
20 matches
Mail list logo
