Henrik Krohns wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:53:54PM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Henrik Krohns wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:19:45PM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
The messages/hour is not a parameter one typically controls. Systems I
build are
build to handle esti
Henrik Krohns wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:19:45PM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> The messages/hour is not a parameter one typically controls. Systems I build
>> are
>> build to handle estimated worst case loads.
>
> Maybe you can't "control" it, but if the load is predictable, what's y
Henrik Krohns wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:55:09PM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
You are running a very underpowered system for a virus scanner. That
is the real shame. Memory is cheap even in third world nations -
there is
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> I'd be real tempted to
>> farm out this function to a capable server via tcp/ip connections.
>
> Okay thanks, is there any guides to farm out such connections to help?
>
I use Sendmail and a milter, J-Chkmail which makes this trivial. It all d
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>> You are running a very underpowered system for a virus scanner. That
>>> is the real shame. Memory is cheap even in third world nations -
>>> there is no reason an on-demand system like a virus scanner should
>>> be shac
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> You are running a very underpowered system for a virus scanner. That
>> is the real shame. Memory is cheap even in third world nations -
>> there is no reason an on-demand system like a virus scanner should be
>> shackled with 256 meg of memory.
>
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> You are running a very underpowered system for a virus scanner. That
> is the real shame. Memory is cheap even in third world nations -
> there is no reason an on-demand system like a virus scanner should be
> shackled with 256 meg of memory.
So... no chance of running cla
On Dec 10, 2007 11:07 PM, Jeffrey Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Is there any way to reduce/control the memory use of clamd?
Dennis is right. But to answer your question, use "ulimit -m" in your
initscript for clamd .
___
Help us build a c
