On Sunday 15 July 2007 08:50, David Boltz wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> I've made the switch to clamd with the latest MailScanner that has direct
> support for clamd. The speed is much much improved from the clamscan. It
> might be worth looking into this. I'm glad I did.
>
> Regards,
> -
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>> there is a Segementation Fault with clamscan 0.91 (Solaris 10
>> on sparc, compiled with gcc 4.11). It seems to occur sometimes
>> when a virus is found. I have two files to verify this
>> (Sorry, I cannot send the files).
>
> Please test the latest SVN version with this fix:
On Sunday 15 July 2007 08:50, David Boltz wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> I've made the switch to clamd with the latest MailScanner that has direct
> support for clamd. The speed is much much improved from the clamscan. It
> might be worth looking into this. I'm glad I did.
>
> Regards,
> -
Hi Luis,
I've made the switch to clamd with the latest MailScanner that has direct
support for clamd. The speed is much much improved from the clamscan. It
might be worth looking into this. I'm glad I did.
Regards,
---
Dave B
Luca Gibelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
