Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.90.2 on Solaris10 box.

2007-04-20 Thread Dennis Peterson
Dj Helmes wrote: > I just upgraded Clamav from clamav-0.88.7 to clamav-0.90.2. on my > Solaris10 box. > I received no issues during the build / make or the install. > When I started my mailRelay I started receiving the following. Has > anyone else experienced this? > > Apr 20 07:27:11 smtp1 mime

Re: [Clamav-users] Signature count differences between freshclam and clamd

2007-04-20 Thread Brian Morrison
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 23:02:22 +0300 "Török Edvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/9/07, Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:56:44 +0100 > > Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Since updating to 0.9x I have noticed that from time to time after a > > >

Re: [Clamav-users] Differences between v0.88.7 and v0.90.2

2007-04-20 Thread Joe Evans
GiM wrote: > Joe Evans in message '[Clamav-users] Differences between v0.88.7 and v0.90.2' > wrote: > [cut] > >> # clamscan -V >> ClamAV 0.88.7/2314/Sun Dec 10 12:02:13 2006 >> # clamscan mybot* sdb* >> mybot5073-TrojanMybot-5073.exe: Trojan.Mybot-5073 FOUND >> mybot7502-TrojanMybot-7502.exe: T

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.90.1 issues

2007-04-20 Thread Christoph Cordes
Sai Bathina schrieb: > > So the output for 0.88.5 looks like this: > > Scanning through Win32.Alcaul.i > Found virus: W32.Kruls.Gen > Scanning through Win32.Alcaul.j > Found virus: W32.Kruls.Gen > Scanning through Win32.Bolzano.3100 > Found virus: W32.Bolzano.Gen > Scanning through Win32.Bolzano.

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.90.1 issues

2007-04-20 Thread Christoph Cordes
Sai Bathina schrieb: > Folks, > > I have about 16 viruses that are not being caught by the 0.90.1 version as > opposed to 0.88.5. I think the problem looks to be in the cli_ac_scanbuff > function. Could you send the samples to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? Please use a password protected zip archive. Thank

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.90.1 issues

2007-04-20 Thread Brian Morrison
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:37:05 -0400 "Sai Bathina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have about 16 viruses that are not being caught by the 0.90.1 version You need to install 0.90.2, I doubt the developers will do much if you're using the previous version. -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org d

[Clamav-users] clamav-0.90.1 issues

2007-04-20 Thread Sai Bathina
Folks, I have about 16 viruses that are not being caught by the 0.90.1 version as opposed to 0.88.5. I think the problem looks to be in the cli_ac_scanbuff function. In 0.88.5 version they are caught within the: if(pt->sigid) { /* it's a partial signature */

Re: [Clamav-users] Differences between v0.88.7 and v0.90.2

2007-04-20 Thread GiM
Joe Evans in message '[Clamav-users] Differences between v0.88.7 and v0.90.2' wrote: [cut] > > # clamscan -V > ClamAV 0.88.7/2314/Sun Dec 10 12:02:13 2006 > # clamscan mybot* sdb* > mybot5073-TrojanMybot-5073.exe: Trojan.Mybot-5073 FOUND > mybot7502-TrojanMybot-7502.exe: Trojan.Mybot-7508 FOUND >

[Clamav-users] clamav-0.90.2 on Solaris10 box.

2007-04-20 Thread Dj Helmes
I just upgraded Clamav from clamav-0.88.7 to clamav-0.90.2. on my Solaris10 box. I received no issues during the build / make or the install. When I started my mailRelay I started receiving the following. Has anyone else experienced this? Apr 20 07:27:11 smtp1 mimedefang.pl[6507]: [ID 702911 mai

Re: [Clamav-users] Install clamav on CentOS 4.4

2007-04-20 Thread Dennis Peterson
Ralph Angenendt wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I have installed it just fine using the source from the ClamAV site. >> It works quite well. I use the OpenSSL version that comes default in >> ClamAV. My only ./configure switches that are used are: >> --disable-zlib-check and --enable-expe

Re: [Clamav-users] Install clamav on CentOS 4.4

2007-04-20 Thread pctech
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have installed it just fine using the source from the ClamAV site. > It works quite well. I use the OpenSSL version that comes default in > ClamAV. My only ./configure switches that are used are: > --disable-zlib-check and --enable-experimental. Yes, but that works

Re: [Clamav-users] Install clamav on CentOS 4.4

2007-04-20 Thread Ralph Angenendt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have installed it just fine using the source from the ClamAV site. > It works quite well. I use the OpenSSL version that comes default in > ClamAV. My only ./configure switches that are used are: > --disable-zlib-check and --enable-experimental. Yes, but that works

Re: [Clamav-users] Install clamav on CentOS 4.4

2007-04-20 Thread pctech
Gustavo Gouvea wrote: > Hi there, has anyone instaled clamav on CentOS 4.4 before?? Any > tips??? Which version of Openssl do I need to use? Will I have to do > it from the source code? By now, Ive been using the rpm packages from > Petr Kristof. Use the packages from *either* the rpmforge repo or

Re: [Clamav-users] Build rpm of 0.90

2007-04-20 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Salvatore wrote: > Hi, now on Fedora Core 3 I have installed: > > clamav-0.88.7-1 > > ...but I have a problem with building rpm for 0.90.2-1 clam version. > When I execute: > #rpmbuild --target i386 -ba SPECS/clamav.spec > RPM build errors: > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.23198 (%doc)

Re: [Clamav-users] Install clamav on CentOS 4.4

2007-04-20 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Rob MacGregor wrote: > Well, the most likely response is that you should install from source :) No, from rpmforge. > Others have already talked about this on the CentOS forums, though the > general flavour was very hostile. That's why I don't use forums. > I suspect you just need to upgrade y

Re: [Clamav-users] Install clamav on CentOS 4.4

2007-04-20 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Gustavo Gouvea wrote: > Hi there, has anyone instaled clamav on CentOS 4.4 before?? Any > tips??? Which version of Openssl do I need to use? Will I have to do > it from the source code? By now, Ive been using the rpm packages from > Petr Kristof. Use the packages from *either* the rpmforge repo or

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd.log says : Loaded 215153 signatures

2007-04-20 Thread Christophe Goudey
> Seems like a problem with your installation: > > Total signatures= 104,500 + 6,153 = 110,652 > > but if clamd loaded twice main... 2 * 104,500 + 6,153 = 215,151 > > which is just about (off by 2) what it reported. Do you have an old database > lying around, perhaps with another name? Yes, you