Re: [Clamav-users] This seems particularly nasty

2006-10-20 Thread Christoph Cordes
Dennis Peterson wrote: > I already know the question is difficult, but it isn't impossible to > answer as there are other AV vendors who have a solution for this > particular problem if the article is to be believed. > So you want to know if the ClamAV Team monitors an infected system to get hand

Re: [Clamav-users] This seems particularly nasty

2006-10-20 Thread Dennis Peterson
Noel Jones wrote: At 10:54 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote: "It is a morphing problem so the question is, is ClamAV moving with it? I don't know and thought it worth asking. I still don't know." Apparently you don't know either, so please make the soap box available to another who may ha

Re: [Clamav-users] This seems particularly nasty

2006-10-20 Thread Noel Jones
At 10:54 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote: "It is a morphing problem so the question is, is ClamAV moving with it? I don't know and thought it worth asking. I still don't know." Apparently you don't know either, so please make the soap box available to another who may have the answer. T

Re: [Clamav-users] This seems particularly nasty

2006-10-20 Thread Dennis Peterson
Noel Jones wrote: At 05:50 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote: > > Dennis Peterson wrote: > > http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/ > > > > Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to clamav is a bit > > worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask abou

Re: [Clamav-users] This seems particularly nasty

2006-10-20 Thread Freddie Cash
On Fri, October 20, 2006 4:50 pm, Noel Jones wrote: > At 05:50 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote: >> It is a morphing problem so the question is, is ClamAV >> moving with it? I don't know and thought it worth asking. I still >> don't know. > > Most likely no one had submitted a sample of that vi

Re: [Clamav-users] This seems particularly nasty

2006-10-20 Thread Noel Jones
At 05:50 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote: > > Dennis Peterson wrote: > > http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/ > > > > Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to clamav is a bit > > worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask about it soon - any >

Re: [Clamav-users] This seems particularly nasty

2006-10-20 Thread Dennis Peterson
> > Dennis Peterson wrote: > > http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/ > > > > Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to clamav is a > > bit > > worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask about it soon - > > any > > words of wisdom I can share regarding

Re: [Clamav-users] This seems particularly nasty

2006-10-20 Thread James Courtier-Dutton
Dennis Peterson wrote: http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/ Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to clamav is a bit worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask about it soon - any words of wisdom I can share regarding the ClamAV tools? dp Not surp

Re: [Clamav-users] This seems particularly nasty

2006-10-20 Thread Facundo Barrera
Pretty scary! FB 2006/10/20, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/ Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to clamav is a bit worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask about it soon - any words of wisdom I can sha

[Clamav-users] This seems particularly nasty

2006-10-20 Thread Dennis Peterson
http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/ Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to clamav is a bit worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask about it soon - any words of wisdom I can share regarding the ClamAV tools? dp ___