On Feb 1, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
Hello,
To get postfix work clamav on fedora 4,
I installed the following packages,
clamav-lib-0.88-1.fc4
clamav-update-0.88-1.fc4
clamav-data-0.88-1.fc4
clamav-0.88-1.fc4
clamav-server-0.88-1.fc4
and
clamsmtp-1.6-1.fc4.mf
However, I have no clue
On 2/1/06, Krištof Petr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mitre? Are not these boys same as Mitre "security experts" from Clifford
> Stoll's
> book CUCKOO'S EGG?
>
Mitre is a major US DoD contractor.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Hello,
To get postfix work clamav on fedora 4,
I installed the following packages,
clamav-lib-0.88-1.fc4
clamav-update-0.88-1.fc4
clamav-data-0.88-1.fc4
clamav-0.88-1.fc4
clamav-server-0.88-1.fc4
and
clamsmtp-1.6-1.fc4.mf
However, I have no clue if I need all of those packages and
how to co
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:11:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> At 02:56 PM 2/1/2006, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> >The usual suggestion in this case is roughly that - have whatever is
> >feeding the message to clamav not do so for messages over a certain
> >size.
>
> i guess the problem is there
At 02:56 PM 2/1/2006, Stephen Gran wrote:
The usual suggestion in this case is roughly that - have whatever is
feeding the message to clamav not do so for messages over a certain
size.
i guess the problem is there seems to be no automated way of doing
that. it's a by-hand task, which is incon
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:46:13PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Some of my business customers occasionally exchange very large
> messages, for example today, a message about 83MB in size. When such
> a message hits my clamd/spamassassin proxy server, clamd's size
> 'explodes', and it start b
Some of my business customers occasionally exchange very large
messages, for example today, a message about 83MB in size. When such
a message hits my clamd/spamassassin proxy server, clamd's size
'explodes', and it start blocking the flow of other messages. for
example, in top, the resident siz
Hi everybody I installed clam for checking mails. The problem is update
database, I have to specify to my admin where freshclam have to connect
to do available connection.
My question is: If I say to the admin that only opens connection to
database.clamv.net , will clam works fine?
If this opt
On Feb 1, 2006, at 9:11 AM, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 17:45 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* On 01/02/06 07:52 -0600, John Jolet wrote:
I fail to see how everyone using the same names protects my users
any
more than they already are by my using the best antivirus se
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 17:45 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> * On 01/02/06 07:52 -0600, John Jolet wrote:
> > I fail to see how everyone using the same names protects my users any
> > more than they already are by my using the best antivirus server-side
> > solution out there. Who cares wh
* On 01/02/06 07:52 -0600, John Jolet wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2006, at 4:32 AM, Randal, Phil wrote:
>
> >Jason Haar wrote:
> >
> >>I've been watching CME (Common Malware Enumerator) starting
> >>to take off over the past few weeks, and I've noticed CME
> >>entries and their corresponding names used
On Feb 1, 2006, at 4:32 AM, Randal, Phil wrote:
Jason Haar wrote:
I've been watching CME (Common Malware Enumerator) starting
to take off over the past few weeks, and I've noticed CME
entries and their corresponding names used by antivirus vendors.
...and ClamAV ain't in there from what I've
I've been watching CME (Common Malware Enumerator) starting
to take off over the past few weeks, and I've noticed CME
entries and their corresponding names used by antivirus vendors.
...and ClamAV ain't in there from what I've seen...
Is there no interest in supporting this, or am I just bli
> I feel that it's going to be quite difficult for me to go though 500-odd
> ClamAV phishing signatures and
> compare them, with an editor to my 100-ish signatures and find out what
> bits are duplicated. I really
> need some samples.
>
> If possible, to save a whole load of time... could you:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Steve Basford wrote:
> From: Steve Basford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:49:03 +
> Subject: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures
>
> There are already a number of great phishing signatures in ClamAV
> but the
Jason Haar wrote:
> I've been watching CME (Common Malware Enumerator) starting
> to take off over the past few weeks, and I've noticed CME
> entries and their corresponding names used by antivirus vendors.
>
> ...and ClamAV ain't in there from what I've seen...
>
> Is there no interest in sup
Jason Haar wrote:
Hi there
I've been watching CME (Common Malware Enumerator) starting to take off
over the past few weeks, and I've noticed CME entries and their
corresponding names used by antivirus vendors.
...and ClamAV ain't in there from what I've seen...
Correct.
Is there no interes
17 matches
Mail list logo
