On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:11:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > At 02:56 PM 2/1/2006, Stephen Gran wrote: > > >The usual suggestion in this case is roughly that - have whatever is > >feeding the message to clamav not do so for messages over a certain > >size. > > i guess the problem is there seems to be no automated way of doing > that. it's a by-hand task, which is inconvenient, to say the least, a > major problem at most.
If you're receiving large files by email, most of the 'glue' methods that exist for calling clamav have size restriction parameters. Certainly exiscan, mailscanner and amavis seem to. There are probably more out there, but those are the ones that come up regularly here. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | I wouldn't marry her with a ten foot | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | pole. | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
