Hello,
I was just curious if there are any plans to alter clamdscan to add the
load balancing features that exist in the milter? If these features
already exist, I am sorry to bug you about it, but I didn't see anything
that jumped out at me in the documentation. Or if anybody knows about a
clamd
Jason Englander wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> MIMEDefang has a "suspicious characters in headers" check. This is
>> unrelated to ClamAV.
>
> ...and if you're using File::Scan
> (http://cpan.perl.org/modules/by-module/File/File-Scan-1.43.tar.gz),
> that also can repor
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MIMEDefang has a "suspicious characters in headers" check. This is
unrelated to ClamAV.
...and if you're using File::Scan
(http://cpan.perl.org/modules/by-module/File/File-Scan-1.43.tar.gz), that
also can report things as suspicious.
Jason
-
Chris Gauch wrote:
> We are currently running ClamAV (0.86.2) in a Linux Sendmail (8.13.4)
> and MIMEDefang (2.53)
> our logs indicate that over 86 attachments have been
> flagged as "suspicious" by ClamAV 0.86.2 over the past couple of
> days. We're beginning to wonder how many of those "suspicio
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 11:24 -0400, Chris Gauch wrote:
> We are currently running ClamAV (0.86.2) in a Linux Sendmail (8.13.4) and
> MIMEDefang (2.53) gateway filtering environment and have seen an increase in
> false positives over the past several weeks. Most client complaints have
> been specifi
We are currently running ClamAV (0.86.2) in a Linux Sendmail (8.13.4) and
MIMEDefang (2.53) gateway filtering environment and have seen an increase in
false positives over the past several weeks. Most client complaints have
been specifically geared toward not received Microsoft Excel attachments,
Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:45:06 +0200 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chantal Rosmuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
it says version 1.2.1, I don't really understand why because I
applied the latest security patch
Did the patch modify the version number? If not, then clamav ca
* On 09/09/05 09:45 +0200, Chantal Rosmuller wrote:
> Hi Wash,
>
> it says version 1.2.1, I don't really understand why because I applied
> the latest security patch
Mine says 1.2.2. However I simply don't bother with that when it comes
to clamav. I grab the latest zlib and use it.
./configure
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:45:06 +0200 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chantal Rosmuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it says version 1.2.1, I don't really understand why because I
> applied the latest security patch
Did the patch modify the version number? If not, then clamav can't tell
that it is secure an
Hi Wash,
it says version 1.2.1, I don't really understand why because I applied
the latest security patch
Chantal
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* On 09/09/05 09:10 +0200, Chantal Rosmuller wrote:
Hi clamav-users,
I have a question about compiling clamav on freebsd 5.4 , I get the
followi
* On 09/09/05 09:10 +0200, Chantal Rosmuller wrote:
> Hi clamav-users,
>
> I have a question about compiling clamav on freebsd 5.4 , I get the
> following error
>
> configure: error: The installed zlib version may contain a security bug.
> Please upgrade to 1.2.2 or later: http://www.zlib.net.
Hi clamav-users,
I have a question about compiling clamav on freebsd 5.4 , I get the
following error
configure: error: The installed zlib version may contain a security bug.
Please upgrade to 1.2.2 or later: http://www.zlib.net. You can omit this
check with --disable-zlib-vcheck but DO NOT R
12 matches
Mail list logo