--- Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050610 22:52]: wrote:
> > Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > * N Fung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050610 20:45]: wrote:
> > >>
Samuel wrote:
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> and what of a virus zipped into a larger zip file? Since the largest
>> message we'll accept is 100M, then that's what my StreamMaxLength is
>> set at, per the comments in clamd.conf. on the other hand, it would
>> take an awfully determined virus distrib
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 4:21 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] odd problem w/clamd
>
>
> and what of a virus zipped into a larger zip file? Since the largest
On Jun 10, 2005, at 13:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:54 PM 6/10/2005, you wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050610 22:49]:
wrote:
> At 10:44 AM 6/10/2005, you wrote:
>
> >Problems with 0.85.1 seem to be confined to FreeBSD.
> >Anything
At 12:57 PM 6/10/2005, you wrote:
By the sounds of the above, I personally would say that wouldn't appear
to be a problem with Clam, rather some other part of your setup or system,
possibly even hardware related.
i have a vague recollection that there may be various memory leaks in
5.2.1, whi
At 12:54 PM 6/10/2005, you wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050610 22:49]: wrote:
> At 10:44 AM 6/10/2005, you wrote:
>
> >Problems with 0.85.1 seem to be confined to FreeBSD.
> >Anything interesting in /var/log/clamd.log?
>
> nothing interesting.
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > > I run 0.85.1 on FreeBSD 4.11, 5.2.1, 5.3 and 5.4 and in all cases I
> > > don't have a problem at all. None of my machines is as high specs
> > > as his.
> > Easy, cowboy. When he says that problems are confined to FreeBSD,
> > that does not imply that all FreeBS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> usually a restart of clamd does the trick, although yesterday even that
> didn't seem to do the trick - after restart of clamd the message woudl
> still trickle, so i rebooted the server, and everything returned to
> normal...
By the sounds of the above, I personall
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050610 22:52]: wrote:
> Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > * N Fung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050610 20:45]: wrote:
> >> Problems with 0.85.1 seem to be confined to FreeBSD.
> >> Anything interesting in
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050610 22:49]: wrote:
> At 10:44 AM 6/10/2005, you wrote:
>
> >Problems with 0.85.1 seem to be confined to FreeBSD.
> >Anything interesting in /var/log/clamd.log?
>
> nothing interesting. records of viruses found, and the
Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * N Fung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050610 20:45]: wrote:
>> Problems with 0.85.1 seem to be confined to FreeBSD.
>> Anything interesting in /var/log/clamd.log?
>
>
> Liar!! Liar!!
>
> I run 0.85.1 on FreeBSD 4.11, 5
At 10:44 AM 6/10/2005, you wrote:
Problems with 0.85.1 seem to be confined to FreeBSD.
Anything interesting in /var/log/clamd.log?
nothing interesting. records of viruses found, and the startup
logging. that's it.
i've adjusted the number of concurrent connections inbound to the
AS/AV serv
* N Fung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050610 20:45]: wrote:
>
>
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > clamd 0.85.1 has been running pretty smoothly for a
> > while, ever since
> > install the day after it was released. the last few days
> > though,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> clamd 0.85.1 has been running pretty smoothly for a
> while, ever since
> install the day after it was released. the last few days
> though, i've
> been running into an odd problem -
>
> first off, this is freebsd 5.2.1 release. dual PIII 1GHZ
> server,
> 895MB
clamd 0.85.1 has been running pretty smoothly for a while, ever since
install the day after it was released. the last few days though, i've
been running into an odd problem -
first off, this is freebsd 5.2.1 release. dual PIII 1GHZ server,
895MB ram. the server does *only* spam and virus scann
Hi all -
I am using clamav-milter, spamass-milter, and milter-greylist 1.6.
I am not an m4 expert by any stretch of the imagination. My sendmail.mc
file looks like this:
dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`greylist',`S=local:/var/milter-greylist/milter-
greylist.sock')dnl
define(`confMILTER_MACROS_HELO', `{
> Hello everybody.
> I have just detected something I think can be a bug in clamav during the
> scanning of the attached files.
This is a known problem which is already under investigation. The
work-around is to clear the LANG variable when starting clamd. It is not
yet
known if the problem lies w
Joanna Roman wrote:
When someone submit a virus sample (in the format of email, exe file, *.hml
file), what criteria does ClamAV team use to classify the virus sample as Worm
or Trojan ?
The format of a submission isn't a criteria, but how the possible
malware behave is.
Best regards,
Die
Hello everybody.
I have just detected something I think can be a bug in clamav during the
scanning of the attached files.
I'm using RedHat 9 and sendmail in a Pentium IV machine as a mail
server. For such a long time (I think it has been from version 0.73 but
I'm not sure) I have seen these mesages
I said:
with perms = rw--- root.root. It was fine (and still is) on cvs from
Stephen Gran wrote:
Yes, that is the problem. This does however fix the problem of clamav
opening all it's descriptors (including the logfile) as root, breaking
permissions for anything else that needs to write t
20 matches
Mail list logo
