Lee Zelyck wrote:
> Does this mean that if I don't 'uncomment' anything
> below this point, I will have the default scan options
> enabled?
> Or do I have to enable each of the options below this
> point to augment the Default Scan Options?
>
> In short: Does the apparent double-negative...:
Greetings all,
I have been upgrading from 0.72 to 0.85-1 this
afternoon, and came to the following blurb that has
stumped me:
# By default clamd uses scan options recommended by
libclamav. This option
# disables recommended options and allows you to
enable selected ones below.
# DO NOT TOUCH I
"G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am subscribed to both the users and development digest lists.
They are spamming me.
Uh, well, that's not "spam" (since it's not "unsolicited"). A better
description would be "They are annoying me".
Anyway, I am also on the digest and see the same
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:49 -0400, Jason Frisvold wrote:
> On 5/27/05, Samuel Benzaquen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If the process is trying some I/O to some not-available, hard-mounted NFS
> > filesystem, then the process will not die with 'kill -9'.
> >
> > Just a thought.
>
> I use NFS to m
On Fri, 27 May 2005 18:28:09 -0300
Pablo Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have been having some problems lately with our installation. We are
> using Sendmail+clamav-milter+clamd as our antivirus solution, over an
> RedHat Linux with a 2.4.21 kernel (RH9).
Which version of ClamAV?
Hi
We have been having some problems lately with our installation. We are
using Sendmail+clamav-milter+clamd as our antivirus solution, over an
RedHat Linux with a 2.4.21 kernel (RH9).
We added a sort of tarpitting solution to our sendmail in order to
stop people from scanning our userbase. What
Dear all,
I had asked a question about the permission of /dev/console. It is
solved in 0.85.1. Thanks for your effort.
Now I have another question. My console is full of ClamAV messages
now. From peeking the code I saw that is a replacement of LogFile. But
LogSyslog is, too. I log w
Samuel Benzaquen wrote:
> > If a 'kill -9' will not kill the process, I would say your problem
> > lies elsewhere than with Clam. That would be more indicative of a
> > hardware or OS problem.
> If the process is trying some I/O to some not-available, hard-mounted
> NFS filesystem, then the pr
On 5/27/05, Samuel Benzaquen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the process is trying some I/O to some not-available, hard-mounted NFS
> filesystem, then the process will not die with 'kill -9'.
>
> Just a thought.
I use NFS to mount the user mail directories, but clam should never
touch that. The
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt Fretwell
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 1:56 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamd lockup ?
>
>
> Jason Frisvold wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The clamd process on one of my mail
Jason Frisvold wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The clamd process on one of my mail servers appears to have locked up
> earlier today. I was unable to restart or kill the process. In fact,
> I had to do a hard reset to fix the problem.
>
> So, Im wondering what steps I can take next time to a) determine w
Hi all,
The clamd process on one of my mail servers appears to have locked up
earlier today. I was unable to restart or kill the process. In fact,
I had to do a hard reset to fix the problem.
So, Im wondering what steps I can take next time to a) determine why
clamd has locked up, b) gather suf
On Fri, 27 May 2005, ramya wrote:
I have a central server from which many servers of mine get their signatures.
When there is a virus outbreak I would like to add the signatures to this
central server so that the signatures get distributed from this server
immediately. I cannot go to each serv
G.W. Haywood wrote:
I am subscribed to both the users and development digest lists.
They are spamming me.
Here are the last three clamav-users Digest mails in my ClamAv mailbox:
141 May 27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (17K) clamav-users Digest, Vol 8, Issue 111
142 May 27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (16K) clamav-u
Damian Menscher wanted us to know:
>On Fri, 27 May 2005, lattera wrote:
>
>>can't use strace, because I don't know the email that is making it
>>hang. that is why I need to use gdb, so I can look through the
>>stack/heap for the email...
>You're saying it's hung, taking 100% of CPU. So just use t
I have a central server from which many servers of mine get their
signatures. When there is a virus outbreak I would like to add the
signatures to this central server so that the signatures get distributed
from this server immediately. I cannot go to each server and add the
signature file (*.hd
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 17:07 -0500, René Berber wrote:
> > So, in conclusion: Are my assumptions correct, that this partially is
> > due to old names? Is there at least a consensus on the classified naming
> > amongst AV vendors (as mentioned above)? And are dots and dashes treated
> > equally these
Hi there,
I am subscribed to both the users and development digest lists.
They are spamming me.
Here are the last three clamav-users Digest mails in my ClamAv mailbox:
141 May 27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (17K) clamav-users Digest, Vol 8, Issue 111
142 May 27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (16K) clamav-users Digest
Hi
> Are you using some kind of (transparent?) proxy that may tamper
> the file?
Too my knowledge I do not use a proxy.
To date, I have downgraded my kernel to the 2.4 series - that did not work.
I have installed the latest devel version - that did not work.
I have downgraded my firewall - sho
On Fri, 27 May 2005 13:49:23 +0300
haplopelma lividum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we deviated from the subject, aren't we?
I don't know, my coffee is still percolating...
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gp
>>
>> permissions are:
>> -rw-rw1 clamav clamav 5 __ 20 13:33 clamd.pid
TK> The pid file is one week old.
so what? :)
one week ago (20/05/5005) i am update clamav from v.0.85 to 0.85.1. so
clamd running one week without restarting!! (if you mean options
FixStaleSocket
On Fri, 27 May 2005 12:09:13 +0300
haplopelma lividum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my system is rh7.3 clamd + clamav-milter v.0.85.1 and i have a
> little
> problem. when i execute "service clamav-milter stop"
> system is
> answering "ok", but don't delete clmilter
my system is rh7.3 clamd + clamav-milter v.0.85.1 and i have a little
problem. when i execute "service clamav-milter stop" system is
answering "ok", but don't delete clmilter.sock. so when i execute
"service clamav-milter start" system get error.
what i am doing wr
Thanks that did the trick.
Darren
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomasz Kojm
Sent: 24 May 2005 12:50
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] recurrsive scan problem on os x
On Tue, 24 May 2005 10:17:08 +0100
"Mowat, Darren" <[EMA
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 16:13 +0100, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > Would it be possible to have existing threads use the old loaded
> > database and to have the new threads use a new loaded database?
> >
> > Destroy the old database when its ref_count hits 0.
>
> Of all the noise that's been put around on
25 matches
Mail list logo
