Re: [Clamav-users] Make install overwriting clamd.conf

2004-10-01 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 00:15:37 +0200 Frank Elsner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:19:39 EDT Dennis Skinner wrote: > > I think I recall someone else reporting that make install on 0.80rc3 > > overwrites any existing clamd.conf file. I just confirmed (twice) > > that it does just

Re: [Clamav-users] Polymorphic viruses

2004-10-01 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:56:22 +0200 Bogus³aw Brandys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Anybody have an idea how to detect polymorphic viruses/ and other > mutating malware ? There is _no_ simple answer on this question because it depends on an encryption technique used by a virus. Some mut

Re: [Clamav-users] Make install overwriting clamd.conf

2004-10-01 Thread Matt
Frank Elsner wrote: > No reaction to this until now. > > I've "*.local" versions which will be copied to the corresponding > "*.conf" files in rc.clamd. This way I overcome their ignorance. > Whilst this is obviously a slight problem, (slight as in your config's should be backed up just in ca

Re: [Clamav-users] Make install overwriting clamd.conf

2004-10-01 Thread Frank Elsner
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:19:39 EDT Dennis Skinner wrote: > I think I recall someone else reporting that make install on 0.80rc3 > overwrites any existing clamd.conf file. I just confirmed (twice) that > it does just that. I've reported that at least two times, last on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:23:41 +020

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus count

2004-10-01 Thread Daniel J McDonald
On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 21:53 +0200, Bogusław Brandys wrote: > Hi, > > > Ryan Moore wrote: > > Dennis Skinner wrote: > > > >> HmmI have 24618 well, I've got 24688. 511 just came out [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# freshclam ClamAV update process started at Fri Oct 1 15:27:09 2004 main.cvd is up

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus count

2004-10-01 Thread Daniel J McDonald
On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 12:31 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Ryan Moore wrote: > > > > Yea, same count here. They probably have another file in their database > > directory or something. > > > > This is what we have. Should some of 'em be removed? > These two don't belon

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus count

2004-10-01 Thread Bogusław Brandys
Hi, Look below [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Ryan Moore wrote: Yea, same count here. They probably have another file in their database directory or something. This is what we have. Should some of 'em be removed? ca3a946c1c51338c17424e66095263fa /var/lib/clamav/clamav-84cd742373f

[Clamav-users] Polymorphic viruses

2004-10-01 Thread Bogusław Brandys
Hello, Anybody have an idea how to detect polymorphic viruses/ and other mutating malware ? Boguslaw Brandys ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus count

2004-10-01 Thread Bogusław Brandys
Hi, Ryan Moore wrote: Dennis Skinner wrote: HmmI have 24618 ClamAV update process started at Fri Oct 1 14:54:00 2004 main.cvd is up to date (version: 27, sigs: 23982, f-level: 2, builder: tomek) daily.cvd is up to date (version: 510, sigs: 636, f-level: 2, builder: trog) Yea, same count her

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus count

2004-10-01 Thread clamav
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Ryan Moore wrote: > > Yea, same count here. They probably have another file in their database > directory or something. > This is what we have. Should some of 'em be removed? ca3a946c1c51338c17424e66095263fa /var/lib/clamav/clamav-84cd742373f2ac28 c325e616e9e030fa9a8c4a5

[Clamav-users] freshclam - Digital Signatures

2004-10-01 Thread Scott Rothgaber
Just built 0.75.1 on FreeBSD 5.2.1 and 'configure' complained that GNU MP was missing. I installed GMP 4.1.4. and re-ran 'configure' but I'm getting the same error... configure: WARNING: ** GNU MP 2 or newer NOT FOUND - digital signature support will be disabled ! What gives? Thanks! Scott

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus count

2004-10-01 Thread Ryan Moore
Dennis Skinner wrote: HmmI have 24618 ClamAV update process started at Fri Oct 1 14:54:00 2004 main.cvd is up to date (version: 27, sigs: 23982, f-level: 2, builder: tomek) daily.cvd is up to date (version: 510, sigs: 636, f-level: 2, builder: trog) Yea, same count here. They probably have

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus count

2004-10-01 Thread Dennis Skinner
Daniel J McDonald wrote: On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 11:36 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know how many viruses we should be catching? I seem to remember having >40k and now we're at ~25k with 0.80rc3. Ideas? Database correctly reloaded (25384 viruses) This is the correct number. if y

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus count

2004-10-01 Thread Daniel J McDonald
On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 11:36 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does anyone know how many viruses we should be catching? I seem to > remember having >40k and now we're at ~25k with 0.80rc3. Ideas? > > >> Database correctly reloaded (25384 viruses) This is the correct number. if you had 40K befo

[Clamav-users] Virus count

2004-10-01 Thread clamav
Does anyone know how many viruses we should be catching? I seem to remember having >40k and now we're at ~25k with 0.80rc3. Ideas? >> Database correctly reloaded (25384 viruses) -Eric ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] Make install overwriting clamd.conf

2004-10-01 Thread Patrick Boutilier
On 10/01/2004 01:19 PM, Dennis Skinner wrote: I think I recall someone else reporting that make install on 0.80rc3 overwrites any existing clamd.conf file. I just confirmed (twice) that it does just that. I made my changes to the conf file and put it in place and then ran make install and then I

[Clamav-users] Make install overwriting clamd.conf

2004-10-01 Thread Dennis Skinner
I think I recall someone else reporting that make install on 0.80rc3 overwrites any existing clamd.conf file. I just confirmed (twice) that it does just that. I made my changes to the conf file and put it in place and then ran make install and then I went to run clamd and it gave the error about r

Re: [Clamav-users] Building 0.80rc3 with SSL built from source

2004-10-01 Thread Erich Titl
At 14:12 01.10.2004 -0700, Shawn Tayler wrote: >Hello, > >I've been looking through the mail list archives and can't seem to locate >the answer to this problem. > >I have been trying to build Clamav from source. I have only been >successful on one machine. All the machines are Slackware, either 9

[Clamav-users] Building 0.80rc3 with SSL built from source

2004-10-01 Thread Shawn Tayler
Hello, I've been looking through the mail list archives and can't seem to locate the answer to this problem. I have been trying to build Clamav from source. I have only been successful on one machine. All the machines are Slackware, either 9, 9.1, or 10.0. The one machine where it builds is th

Re: [Clamav-users] Delays scanning MS Access db file ?

2004-10-01 Thread Bogusław Brandys
Hi, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: I've just run into a problem where clam is taking about 2 minutes to scan a 4.5 mb MS access database file. I'm seeing this on .80rc2 and the Sept 29 snap. Unfortunately the data is proprietary and it doesn't look like I'm going to be able to submit it. I'm tr