Re: [Clamav-users] Second-tier Mirrors...

2004-08-25 Thread Graham Toal
> In fact that is why I chose to use the term franchisee earlier - so far > I've described only the first layer in all of this. A full working model > would be a tree structure not unlike the Amway model. Only without the > huckstering. > Associate it with a business model that creates revenue for

RE: [Clamav-users] Second-tier Mirrors...

2004-08-25 Thread Damian Menscher
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Tim Howell said: > > > > I would love to setup a mirror, but 10Mbps and 100GB/month is more than > > I've got available. > > Those figures don't account for clever scripting that some folks are > willing to implement that defeat the round-robin distribu

RE: [Clamav-users] Second-tier Mirrors...

2004-08-25 Thread Dennis Peterson
Tim Howell said: > > > I would love to setup a mirror, but 10Mbps and 100GB/month is more than > I've got available. > Those figures don't account for clever scripting that some folks are willing to implement that defeat the round-robin distribution now in place. If you have a faster than average

Re: [Clamav-users] Second-tier Mirrors...

2004-08-25 Thread Dennis Peterson
Graham Toal said: >> Currently each mirror contributes around 100GB of traffic monthly >> >> Perhaps (not sure of the DNS system in place) could be arranged so that >> 10% >> of the requests a full primary mirror receives could be directed to a >> secondary level mirror. With a committment of only

Re: [Clamav-users] Idea for more timely virusdb updates

2004-08-25 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:26:50 +0700 "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm concerned about the fact that you only use one NS for > cvd.clamav.net though. There will be at least 6 when the testing period is over. > Is there a fallback scenario (automagically revert to HTTP GETs) if >

Re: [Clamav-users] Two Clamuko questions

2004-08-25 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:16:59 -0400 Joel Shellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) I want to be notified of a virus found but under VirusEvent in > clamav.conf, how do I get the infected file's path? %f is no longer supported - you have to write a script that takes a virus name (%s) as an argument

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd segment faults -- zip archives

2004-08-25 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:35:00 -0400 Dennis Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I took a quick look around and it appears the zlib-dev list is private > (including the archives) and I don't see a bugzilla for them anywhere. > Is this problem known by them or just ClamAV ppl? Anyone know what/if >

Re: [Clamav-users] Second-tier Mirrors...

2004-08-25 Thread Graham Toal
> Currently each mirror contributes around 100GB of traffic monthly > > Perhaps (not sure of the DNS system in place) could be arranged so that 10% > of the requests a full primary mirror receives could be directed to a > secondary level mirror. With a committment of only roughly 10GB per month, >

RE: [Clamav-users] Second-tier Mirrors...

2004-08-25 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
> I would love to setup a mirror, but 10Mbps and 100GB/month is more than > I've got available. > > --TWH By my count that makes 5 of us I recall seeing volunteer and it isn't even an option yet. As we are already trampling the rules with cnames to cnames... what about this... the second tier cna

RE: [Clamav-users] Second-tier Mirrors...

2004-08-25 Thread Tim Howell
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Damian Menscher wrote: >> It would help if you could define what you mean by a second-tier mirror. >> If you allow just anyone to connect, then what makes you second-tier >> instead of primary-tier? And if you restrict your connections to come >> from within your domain,

Re: [Clamav-users] all primary virus scanners failed...

2004-08-25 Thread Elvar
rm.SomeFool.P), [68.48.53.163] > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > quarantine: virus-20040825-015000-01559-08, Message-ID: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hits: - > > > > > > I don't always get the above errors but on the majority of inco

Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Dennis Peterson
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: Dennis Peterson wrote: Shayne Lebrun wrote: Any reason why that percentage should be less than 100? Cost of bandwidth, cost of equipment, and cost of administrating the purchase/access system? And liability insurance. Hmm ... which makes me wonder. Say ... 1) I host an offic

RE: [Clamav-users] Second-tier Mirrors...

2004-08-25 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
> > > Someone recently suggested the idea of allowing sites with > less than the > > > mirror site requirements becoming second-tier mirrors. This thread is > > > an attempt to see what kind of interest there is in such an > idea and for > > > the developers to respond whether or not the idea has

Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Damian Menscher
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > 4) I setup atomated firewall system which automagically blocks > non-paying users which connects to my server too often (perhaps in less > 30 minutes interval). > > (4) might be a problem, since it might violate some requirements of > becoming a publi

Re: [Clamav-users] Second-tier Mirrors...

2004-08-25 Thread Damian Menscher
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Damian Menscher wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Tim Howell wrote: > > > Someone recently suggested the idea of allowing sites with less than the > > mirror site requirements becoming second-tier mirrors. This thread is > > an attempt to see what kind of interest there is in such

RE: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Shayne Lebrun
> > Cost of bandwidth, cost of equipment, and cost of administrating the > > purchase/access system? > > > > And liability insurance. > Aye, good point. Especially if you're going to be hoping to sell to corporate clients. --- SF.Net email is

RE: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Shayne Lebrun
> > > Any reason why that percentage should be less than 100? > > > > > Cost of bandwidth, cost of equipment, and cost of administrating the > > purchase/access system? > > Welcome to the area of open source... > Open source is all well and good, but bandwidth still costs. -

Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
Dennis Peterson wrote: Shayne Lebrun wrote: Any reason why that percentage should be less than 100? Cost of bandwidth, cost of equipment, and cost of administrating the purchase/access system? And liability insurance. Hmm ... which makes me wonder. Say ... 1) I host an official public mirror, which

Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Dennis Peterson
Nigel Horne wrote: On Wednesday 25 Aug 2004 12:09, Andy Fiddaman wrote: I'd be interested in running one of these if the database team would be willing to push updates out to a private mirror. (A percentage of the revenue generated would then be fed back into the ClamAV project!) Any reason why

Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Dennis Peterson
Shayne Lebrun wrote: Any reason why that percentage should be less than 100? Cost of bandwidth, cost of equipment, and cost of administrating the purchase/access system? And liability insurance. dp --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lo

RE: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Nigel Horne
> > Any reason why that percentage should be less than 100? > > > Cost of bandwidth, cost of equipment, and cost of administrating the > purchase/access system? Welcome to the area of open source... --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.c

Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread B. van Ouwerkerk
Or, how about a subscription only (i.e. pay for) mirror which people can query every five minutes if they like ? Note that although you shouldn't, you CAN query any official mirror every minute if you want :) No mirror that I know of is able to prevent that. Yet. iptables/netfilter :-) So I would

Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Dennis Peterson
Julio Canto wrote: Or, how about a subscription only (i.e. pay for) mirror which people can query every five minutes if they like ? This has the advantage that users who require this don't have to do anything special (like set up an rsync server), just change the mirror they use and the interval

RE: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Andy Fiddaman
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Shayne Lebrun wrote: ; > Any reason why that percentage should be less than 100? ; > ; Cost of bandwidth, cost of equipment, and cost of administrating the ; purchase/access system? That about covers it. To be worth anything, the mirror farm would have to be able to support

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd segment faults -- zip archives

2004-08-25 Thread Dennis Skinner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nigel Horne wrote: | This is a known problem with zlib, not clamd. Please (a) ensure | you have an older version (1.1.4 I think, but someone else will | correct me no doubt) and (b) hassle the author of zlib to fix his/her | code. I took a quick look ar

Re: [Clamav-users] postfix+clamav without amavisd-new

2004-08-25 Thread John Fleming
> > What are some other ways to get clamd support in postfix without using > > amavisd-new because I don't need all the features of amavisd-new. Google for clamassassin. Called from procmail, then procmail the results to wherever you want. Works with clamscan or clamdscan. - John --

RE: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Shayne Lebrun
> Any reason why that percentage should be less than 100? > Cost of bandwidth, cost of equipment, and cost of administrating the purchase/access system? --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD

Re: [Clamav-users] postfix+clamav without amavisd-new

2004-08-25 Thread Alex V. Kovirshin
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:38:53PM +0200, Lionel Bouton wrote: > Alex V. Kovirshin wrote the following on 08/25/2004 02:50 PM : > > >On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:39:20PM -0700, Ajay wrote: > > > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>What are some other ways to get clamd support in postfix without using > >>amavisd-n

Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Nigel Horne
On Wednesday 25 Aug 2004 12:09, Andy Fiddaman wrote: > I'd be interested in running one of these if the database team would be > willing to push updates out to a private mirror. (A percentage of the > revenue generated would then be fed back into the ClamAV project!) Any reason why that percenta

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd segment faults -- zip archives

2004-08-25 Thread Nigel Horne
On Wednesday 25 Aug 2004 12:34, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Trog wrote: > > > Which version of libz are you using? Anything other than 1.1.4 is liable > > to crash or have security problems. > > Just to be clear -- you are saying the latest verion 1.2.1 has problems ? Y

Re: [Clamav-users] postfix+clamav without amavisd-new

2004-08-25 Thread Lionel Bouton
Alex V. Kovirshin wrote the following on 08/25/2004 02:50 PM : On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:39:20PM -0700, Ajay wrote: Hi, What are some other ways to get clamd support in postfix without using amavisd-new because I don't need all the features of amavisd-new. Hi. Try my script, it's simple.

Re: [Clamav-users] postfix+clamav without amavisd-new

2004-08-25 Thread John Madden
> My setup is really basic where everyone has a shell account so in order > for everyone to have their own bayes databases, I need to run > spamassassin outside of amavisd-new. If there aren't any decent > alternative then I'll just run amavisd-new without the spamassassin > settings. This is how

Re: [Clamav-users] all primary virus scanners failed...

2004-08-25 Thread Stephen Gran
]: (01559-08) > Blocked INFECTED (Worm.SomeFool.P), [68.48.53.163] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > quarantine: virus-20040825-015000-01559-08, Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hits: - > > > I don't always get the above errors but on t

Re: [Clamav-users] postfix+clamav without amavisd-new

2004-08-25 Thread Alex V. Kovirshin
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:39:20PM -0700, Ajay wrote: > > Hi, > > What are some other ways to get clamd support in postfix without using > amavisd-new because I don't need all the features of amavisd-new. Hi. Try my script, it's simple. > > My setup is really basic where everyone has a shell

Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Julio Canto
Or, how about a subscription only (i.e. pay for) mirror which people can query every five minutes if they like ? This has the advantage that users who require this don't have to do anything special (like set up an rsync server), just change the mirror they use and the interval that freshclam runs.

Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
Andy Fiddaman wrote: On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Dennis Peterson wrote: ; > > The ClamAV ; > > vendor can offer a push of the AV patterns to paying customers with ; > > special needs. That way you will receive the updates as quickly as do the ; > > mirrors and the vendor recovers some of the cost of maint

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd segment faults -- zip archives

2004-08-25 Thread Trog
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 12:34, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Trog wrote: > > > Which version of libz are you using? Anything other than 1.1.4 is liable > > to crash or have security problems. > > Just to be clear -- you are saying the latest verion 1.2.1 has problems ? Yes,

Re: [Clamav-users] postfix+clamav without amavisd-new

2004-08-25 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On Aug 24, 2004, at 10:39 PM, Ajay wrote: Hi, What are some other ways to get clamd support in postfix without using amavisd-new because I don't need all the features of amavisd-new. My setup is really basic where everyone has a shell account so in order for everyone to have their own bayes data

Re: [Clamav-users] Compression limit ..... Much too low for me :(

2004-08-25 Thread Jim Maul
Quoting Thierry Jaboeuf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello All I use an Debian-Linux Box here at work for 6 month now For Email server. No problem with Calmav until yesterday... It seems our WebMaster want to send part of a new web site To someone... I got an Oversized zip alert. One file on the zip is qui

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd segment faults -- zip archives

2004-08-25 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Trog wrote: > Which version of libz are you using? Anything other than 1.1.4 is liable > to crash or have security problems. Just to be clear -- you are saying the latest verion 1.2.1 has problems ? Is this documented any place ?

Re: [Clamav-users] Compression limit ..... Much too low for me :(

2004-08-25 Thread Lionel Bouton
Thierry Jaboeuf wrote the following on 08/25/2004 12:17 PM : Hello All I use an Debian-Linux Box here at work for 6 month now For Email server. No problem with Calmav until yesterday... It seems our WebMaster want to send part of a new web site To someone... I got an Oversized zip alert. One file o

Re: [Clamav-users] Downloading clam virus definition files automatically

2004-08-25 Thread Andy Fiddaman
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Dennis Peterson wrote: ; Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: ; > Dennis Peterson wrote: ; > ; > > The ClamAV ; > > vendor can offer a push of the AV patterns to paying customers with ; > > special needs. That way you will receive the updates as quickly as do the ; > > mirrors and the ven

[Clamav-users] Compression limit ..... Much too low for me :(

2004-08-25 Thread Thierry Jaboeuf
Hello All I use an Debian-Linux Box here at work for 6 month now For Email server. No problem with Calmav until yesterday... It seems our WebMaster want to send part of a new web site To someone... I got an Oversized zip alert. One file on the zip is quite amazing... A BMP picture file of 115254

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd segment faults -- zip archives

2004-08-25 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 17:54, Matt wrote: > Dale Anderson wrote: > > > I have been having segment faults with clamd. I think > > I am finding it happens on zip archives. I have sent a > > few test virus zip files to the system each of them > > causing a segment fault. Can someone help me out? > >

Re: [Clamav-users] all primary virus scanners failed...

2004-08-25 Thread Nigel Horne
(Worm.SomeFool.P), [68.48.53.163] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > quarantine: virus-20040825-015000-01559-08, Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hits: - This looks like a problem with Amavis. Either drop it and go to a 100% ClamAV solution fo

[Clamav-users] all primary virus scanners failed...

2004-08-25 Thread Elvar
t;, quarantine: virus-20040825-015000-01559-08, Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hits: - I don't always get the above errors but on the majority of incoming emails I do see this. When I start amavis it seems to detect clamd as primary and clamscan as secondary without any problems. Th