Dennis Peterson wrote:
Shayne Lebrun wrote:
Any reason why that percentage should be less than 100?
Cost of bandwidth, cost of equipment, and cost of administrating the purchase/access system?
And liability insurance.
Hmm ...
which makes me wonder.
Say ...
1) I host an official public mirror, which makes me able to obtain updates immediately
2) I sell the "immediate push-update" service that you talk about
3) I contribute some money that I get back to clamav
4) I setup atomated firewall system which automagically blocks non-paying users which connects to my server too often (perhaps in less 30 minutes interval).
I wonder if it's acceptable in terms of license ?
License-wise, (3) might not even be necessary. Do people who provide commercial support form clamav actually contributes some money that they earn? Not all, I think.
(4) might be a problem, since it might violate some requirements of becoming a public mirror (the docs doesnt't specifically prevent that though).
Regards,
Fajar
All parties are willing and agreeable, and the vendor stands to make some money. I can't imagine that would be a bad thing. I wouldn't underestimate the importance of liability, tho.
dp
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
