I just noticed that clamd has a large number of files opened that the
directory entries have been deleted. There are well over a hundred of
them. The sizes appear to be about right for emails.
On Jul 28, 2004, at 15:16, Doug Hardie wrote:
I am running
FreeBSD 4.6
ClamAV version devel-20040728
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:21:23 -0400 (EDT)
Igor Brezac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Mike Lambert wrote:
OS: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p2
ClamAV: devel-20040728
Build options:
--enable-milter
--disable-clamuko
--enable-bigstack
--disable-dependency-
Can someone share experieces of running 0.75 on OpenBSD?
I plan to upgrade from 0.71 to 0.75. I have OpenBSD-3.5 and
smtp-vilter 1.1.5
TIA,
Zoong PHAM
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerome
> Loyet
> Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 9:28
Is there any way to have clamd stop scanning a file/archive/etc fed to
it after a set amount of seconds, and return an error?
--
Brian Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
Open Solutions For A Closed World / Anti-Spam Resources
http://www.sosdg.org
The Abusive Hosts Blocking List
http:
I am working from digest... Too many mails to handle from lists these
days, please copy me directly on responses if possible :-(
Thanks to those that replied, it is appreciated. Perhaps I should have
laid out my reasons along with my request so that a better understanding
was in hand. I have us
with all the other problems reported for 0.75, i'm not sure that this is
that important. i've backed down to 0.74 for now.
when clamd is running, clamdscan hangs. if i stop clamd, clamdscan
fails. this didn't happen with 0.74.
build environment:
fedora core 1
no arguments to "./configure"
run
. Versions devel-20040729 and
devel-20040728.
Regards,
Rick
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:21:23 -0400 (EDT)
Igor Brezac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Mike Lambert wrote:
>
> > OS: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p2
> > ClamAV: devel-20040728
> >
> > Build options:
> > --enable-milter
> > --disable-clamuko
> > --enable-bigstack
> > --disable-dependency
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Mike Lambert wrote:
OS: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p2
ClamAV: devel-20040728
Build options:
--enable-milter
--disable-clamuko
--enable-bigstack
--disable-dependency-tracking
In 24 hours of running, memory usage for clamd (devel-20040728) has
steadily increased from 5MB to 63MB.
Does a
On Jul 29, 2004, at 00:32, Trog wrote:
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 23:16, Doug Hardie wrote:
I was using clamav-0.70-rc for a long time because it was stable and
never crashed. However, it started missing a lot of newer viruses so
I
upgraded to the version above.
Clamd is giving a segment violation ev
OS: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p2
ClamAV: devel-20040728
Build options:
--enable-milter
--disable-clamuko
--enable-bigstack
--disable-dependency-tracking
In 24 hours of running, memory usage for clamd (devel-20040728) has
steadily increased from 5MB to 63MB.
Does anyone have suggestions for building/co
On Thursday 29 July 2004 15:59, Jason wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have searched far and wide, a rare case where google comes up
> relatively short. Has anyone attempted to use clam with .qmail or
> .qmail-default files instead of patching qmail with QMAILQUEUE and using
> qmail-scanner?
>
> I am lookin
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:59:58 -0400, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have searched far and wide, a rare case where google comes up
> relatively short. Has anyone attempted to use clam with .qmail or
> ..qmail-default files instead of patching qmail with QMAILQUEUE and using
> qmai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've just downloaded and compiled the last CVS and clamav isn't longer
able to scan RAR archive.
I've tried to scan test/test.rar of the tar.gz and it doesn't works:
$clamscan --debug test.rar
(...)
LibClamAV debug: Recognized RAR file
LibClamAV deb
Trog wrote:
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 23:16, Doug Hardie wrote:
I was using clamav-0.70-rc for a long time because it was stable and
never crashed. However, it started missing a lot of newer viruses so I
upgraded to the version above.
Clamd is giving a segment violation every 2 to 6 hours and I h
Hi list,
I have searched far and wide, a rare case where google comes up
relatively short. Has anyone attempted to use clam with .qmail or
.qmail-default files instead of patching qmail with QMAILQUEUE and using
qmail-scanner?
I am looking at doing this work if it has not been done before, if i
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:34:44 +0200
"Rob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Are there going to be released official patches or a new release to
> >correct the issues that have been mentioned on this list? I wanted to
> >update but this issue have kept me back. I don't want to use the
> >CVS-version o
Et cetera would be the proper way, (not slang), to word that phrase :-)
Apologies. The thread was slightly renamed at one point, but the SF
timelag obviously doesn't help people to see it.
Matt
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Web
Are there going to be released official patches or a new release to
correct the issues that have been mentioned on this list? I wanted to
update but this issue have kept me back. I don't want to use the
CVS-version on a production machine. I think that it would be nice if
there were released offici
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 00:30, Scott Call wrote:
>
> I've gone back to 0.73 for now, but any hints or tips would be greatly
> apreciated.
>
If you are using any version of zlib (libz) other than 1.1.4 (including
1.2.x) then install 1.1.4.
Otherwise please attach gdb to the running clamd process
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 23:16, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I was using clamav-0.70-rc for a long time because it was stable and
> never crashed. However, it started missing a lot of newer viruses so I
> upgraded to the version above.
>
> Clamd is giving a segment violation every 2 to 6 hours and I have
21 matches
Mail list logo
