On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:59:58 -0400, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > > I have searched far and wide, a rare case where google comes up > relatively short. Has anyone attempted to use clam with .qmail or > ..qmail-default files instead of patching qmail with QMAILQUEUE and using > qmail-scanner? > > I am looking at doing this work if it has not been done before, if it > has or will not work please share you thoughts as to why. >
The best way to do this would be using procmail. dot-qmail files aren't really a great way to filter, they are more for delivery. The newest version of netqmail comes pre-patched with QMAILQUEUE. I really like qmail-scanner because of the other functions it provides as well as a way to handle viruses. -Steve ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
