On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Gavin Aiken wrote:
> The only case I'm worried about is what happens if our primary MX (which is
> my box and had clamav installed) is offline for whatever reason (eg SDSL
> down), and the mail gets routed via our secondary MX machines, which are at
> Easynet and don't do any
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:16:13 -0300, Matias Lopez Bergero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi again,
>First I would like to say that this av it is excellent! Great work!
>
>I have a question, perhaps it is a little trivial.
>
>I am using ClamAV version 0.70 and clamav-milter version 0.70j.
>
>It is poss
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:18:28 -0700 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Gavin Aiken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > The only case I'm worried about is what happens if our primary MX
> > (which is my box and had clamav installed) is offline for whatever
> > reason (eg SDSL down),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Gavin Aiken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The only case
I'm worried about is what happens if our primary MX (which is my
box and had clamav installed) is offline for whatever reason (eg
SDSL down), and the mail gets routed via our secondary MX machines,
which are at Easyn
Thank's for that Fajar,
I found Dag's 64 bit rpms and they worked fine.
Interestingly I still couldn't compile from source even using your
suggestion?
Regards,
David.
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
David wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problems installing clamav on fedora core 2_64.
---
Hi again,
First I would like to say that this av it is excellent! Great work!
I have a question, perhaps it is a little trivial.
I am using ClamAV version 0.70 and clamav-milter version 0.70j.
It is possible to edit the "virus intercepted" message?.
This message is generated by clamav-milter right?
> From: Gavin Aiken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The only case I'm worried about is what happens if our primary MX (which is
> my box and had clamav installed) is offline for whatever reason (eg SDSL
> down), and the mail gets routed via our secondary MX machines, which are at
> Easynet and don't do
OK - That makes a lot of sense actually. We were rejecting them AND sending
the bounce message as well. After doing some testing, it looks like if I
just switch to using --quiet on the milter command line, we reject only and
don't bounce (or notify postmaster), which is pretty much what I wanted.
Bill Randle wanted us to know:
>Good point, Todd. 9.1 used perl 5.601, while 9.2 uses 5.8.1. However,
>I'm not aware of any Perl files/modules used by clamav. Am I missing
>something? If this were SpamAssassin we were talking about, I would
>agree.
You're spot on. I was writing clam and thinking
