On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 09:19:51PM -0500, John Jolet wrote:
> We, in fact, have smtp outbound blocked for ALL but our mail servers, for
> that very reason. With the notable exception of our network monitoring box
> and the 3 or 4 outbound smtp servers, nothing can send mail out without
> passing t
I would suggest to check the log for errors.
Also you can use 'monit' monitor clamd, it can watch the mem usage as well
as the clamd daemon.
http://www.tildeslash.com/monit
They have examples here;
http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/examples.html#clamavd
You can also use clamdwatch which is include
Hi,
Are there any particular reasons why clamd might die all of sudden? It
happens to me atleast once a week. And then I have to many a times
remove the clamd file and restart clamd. And the worst part is that
my messages starts bouncing if clamd dies stating that it cannot connect
to clamd.
What
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 05:41:11PM -0500, McKeever Chris wrote:
> ---
> Chris McKeever
> If you want to reply directly to me, please use cgmckeever--at--prupref---dot---com
> http://www.prupref.com
> Prudential Preferred Properties
> Chicago and Illinois Nort
---
Chris McKeever
If you want to reply directly to me, please use cgmckeever--at--prupref---dot---com
http://www.prupref.com
Prudential Preferred Properties
Chicago and Illinois NorthShore Real Estate Experts
On Sun, 16 May 2004 13:42 , Eric Becker <[EMAIL
Eric Becker wrote:
Well - in this case it was definitely from outside - and the >proxy I
wrote and use passes all email, internal or external, >through clam and
?spam assassin and a bunch of custom rules... but thanks >:-)
Well depending on the virus, it may be sending emails from it's own sm
>Well - in this case it was definitely from outside - and the >proxy I
>wrote and use passes all email, internal or external, >through clam and
?spam assassin and a bunch of custom rules... but thanks >:-)
Well depending on the virus, it may be sending emails from it's own smtp
engine and not to
McKeever Chris wrote:
one thing that I noticed/learned was that if a users machines sends an email internally (ie a virus), it misses the clam-mail-gateway and goes
right to the mailserver, hence avoiding clam (I have since denied all hosts to the mailserver other than the mail-gateway to stop thi
one thing that I noticed/learned was that if a users machines sends an email
internally (ie a virus), it misses the clam-mail-gateway and goes
right to the mailserver, hence avoiding clam (I have since denied all hosts to the
mailserver other than the mail-gateway to stop this)...so in a
long-r
On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 02:26, Steven P. Donegan wrote:
> This was a first for me - ClamAV has been - well about as perfect as any
> software could be - today one sneaked by that Norton/Symantec caught.
>
I've only seen it twice recently..
One was a damaged Netsky/SomeFool that only Symantecs signa
10 matches
Mail list logo
