Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan 0.67 crashes on Solaris in zlib

2004-02-28 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:24:36 +0100 Paul Boven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm just giving ClamAV a try, but unfortunately it coredumps somewhere > in libz when trying test/test2.badext and test/test2.zip. > > Machine is SunBlade 2000, Solaris 9, Sun Compiler 7. A temporary fix is to recompile c

Re: [Clamav-users] optimal freshclam update frequency

2004-02-28 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 23:16:23 -0500 (EST) jef moskot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know this has been asked a long time ago, but with all the new > mirrors up and the recent barrage of new worms, I've been wondering > what the ClamAV team suggests for a reasonable update rate? > > One of my users

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: 5 from testvirus.com came through

2004-02-28 Thread Rob
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Nigel Horne > > cl_mbox() isn't being called. Please ensure that the file you give it > (eicar-binhex) is a valid email. It is, and I've put it up at http://macgregor.myby.co.uk/eicar-binhex, howeve

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: 5 from testvirus.com came through

2004-02-28 Thread Nigel Horne
On Saturday 28 February 2004 11:15 am, Rob wrote: > A test run showing it all not working: > > $ clamscan --debug -r --mbox eicar-binhex > LibClamAV debug: Loading databases from /usr/local/share/clamav > LibClamAV debug: Loading /usr/local/share/clamav/main.cvd [snip] cl_mbox() isn't being calle

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: 5 from testvirus.com came through

2004-02-28 Thread Rob
CVS (clamscan / ClamAV version devel-20040228) and had exactly the same non-result (below) Heck, I've even tried logging calls to binhexBegin, but nothing is ever logged (added a call to cli_dbgmsg()); Don't know if it's relevant, but messageToText() contains: if(binhexBegin(m

Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan 0.67 crashes on Solaris in zlib

2004-02-28 Thread Thomas Lamy
Paul Boven schrieb: Hi everyone, (resending because the first one is hanging in moderation limbo even though I did subscribe beforehand) I'm just giving ClamAV a try, but unfortunately it coredumps somewhere in libz when trying test/test2.badext and test/test2.zip. Machine is SunBlade 2000, Sol

[Clamav-users] Re: 5 from testvirus.com came through

2004-02-28 Thread Andy Fiddaman
Well, your message didn't get through Clam here ;) A Virus has been detected in a mail message. Scanner:Clam Quarantine ID: i1SA7ST7012100 Remote IP: 66.35.250.206 (lists.sourceforge.net) From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[E

[Clamav-users] Re: 5 from testvirus.com came through

2004-02-28 Thread Nigel Horne
On Saturday 28 February 2004 9:51 am, Rob wrote: > > What version of mbox.c do you have? Binhex was only disabled > > in CVS for a couple of days. Whoops I meant message.c. Anything later than > I'd guess then that there never was a message saying that the functionality > had been re-enabled?

[Clamav-users] clamscan 0.67 crashes on Solaris in zlib

2004-02-28 Thread Paul Boven
Hi everyone, (resending because the first one is hanging in moderation limbo even though I did subscribe beforehand) I'm just giving ClamAV a try, but unfortunately it coredumps somewhere in libz when trying test/test2.badext and test/test2.zip. Machine is SunBlade 2000, Solaris 9, Sun Compiler

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: 5 from testvirus.com came through

2004-02-28 Thread Rob
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Nigel Horne > > What version of mbox.c do you have? Binhex was only disabled > in CVS for a couple of days. Just tried the latest CVS with exactly the same result. With the following inside a mai

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: 5 from testvirus.com came through

2004-02-28 Thread Rob
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Nigel Horne > > What version of mbox.c do you have? Binhex was only disabled > in CVS for a couple of days. V1.44 I'd guess then that there never was a message saying that the functionality had b

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: 5 from testvirus.com came through

2004-02-28 Thread Nigel Horne
On Saturday 28 Feb 2004 7:52 am, Rob wrote: > I've got 0.67 installed and the BinHex encodings still get through. I > wonder if the following comment in message.c might be related: > > * Revision 1.23 2004/02/03 23:04:09 nigelhorne > * Disabled binhex code > > I'm running it on FreeBSD 5.2-CU

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: 5 from testvirus.com came through

2004-02-28 Thread Rob
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Nigel Horne > > On Friday 27 February 2004 10:27 pm, Bryce wrote: > > Test # 17, 8, 5, 4, and 2 are making it through. I am using > version .65. > > What can I do to prevent this? > > Binhex was a

Re: [Clamav-users] optimal freshclam update frequency

2004-02-28 Thread Erik Corry
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:16:23PM -0500, jef moskot wrote: > I know this has been asked a long time ago, but with all the new mirrors > up and the recent barrage of new worms, I've been wondering what the > ClamAV team suggests for a reasonable update rate? > > One of my users has suggested once