On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:29:19 +0100
Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, I thought you would release 0.66 /without/ OLE2 and VBA, to make
> it a real _stable_ version. Then 0.67-dev could come up with OLE2 and
The CVS version is still broken (see thread timeout related threads in
last week
Still getting plenty SCO.A's over herer too.
Has anybody started seeing the variant "MyDoom.B" yet?
Jessica
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 08:19, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
I noticed that the virus count has dropped back to pre-SCO.A levels
starting around 0330 UTC this morning. I have not seen a single SCO.A
Got this while starting clamd:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# clamd
LibClamAV debug: Loading databases from /var/lib/clamav
LibClamAV Error: cl_loaddb(): Can't open file /var/lib/clamav/iruses.db
LibClamAV debug: cl_loaddbdir(): error loading database /var/lib/clamav/iruses.db
ERROR: Unable to open fil
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:12:10 -0800
Mark Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, despite my better judgement I decided to go ahead and install
> clamav-devel-20040110 on my OSX 10.1.5 machine. Seems to work well,
> as far as I can tell. Tests run fine.
>
> The only issues I've had are freshc
Last night I made a small change to qmail-scanner.pl- I added 'worm.sco.a'
to the array $silent_viruses_array. (To prevent sending Virus Found messages
to innocent "sender" addresses)
It now looks like:
my
@silent_viruses_array=('klez','bugbear','worm.sco.a','hybris','yaha','braid'
,'nimda','tanat
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Tuesday 27 Jan 2004 7:36 pm, Mailing Lists wrote:
Does clamav-milter delete these emails or move them to some quarantine
directory. I am using a default rpm install from
http://crash.fce.vutbr.cz/crash-hat/1/clamav/
That depends in whether or not you're using either
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 at 18:20:28 -0600, Internet Helpdesk wrote:
> I've got a user who says yahoo groups is getting an error message when
> trying to send an email to our email server.
>
> Here's a part of the transcript from the customer:
>
[...]
> Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Virus detected by Cl
You are exactly right. Hit us on Monday and hasn't stopped since.
--
Jeff
> Hi.
>
> My SMTP filter running ClamAV is blocking a huge amount of messages
> with the Worm.SCO.A.
> It seams to be the same virus as MyDoom or Novarg.
> Can anyone confirm this?!
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Att
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:34:33 + Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
exclaimed:
> This comment has been obseleted by the changes to today's CVS snapshot.
>
> > > Shawn
> >
> > -Nigel
Excellent Thanks
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by Ec
Afirmative. I compiled sendmail with milter support. The .configure
reported no on milter items, so I manualy built libmilter and installed it.
Now .configure reports yes on milter items, but still the clamav-milter
never gets built. I will check my make logs to see if I have the same bomb
out t
They are the same. AV vendors just have their way of naming the same virus.
We call it Worm.SCO.A. McAfee calls it MyDoom. Symantec calls it Novarg.
Cheers,
fritz
---
+ Basta Ikaw Lord
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Viana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29,
ClamAV was picking up the original version here 6 hours before McAfee had
their 4319 DATs out, and detected the "B" variant here yesterday at least 4
hours before McAfee's 4320 DATs were released.
You guys deserve medals.
A big heartfelt thank you to all the ClamAV team (and virus submitters).
P
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 at 15:23:28 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>
> I Verified on 3 diffrent systems (cvs 2004-01-20 running)
> clamscan detects, clamdscan not.
>
> When I stop clamd and strat it again it works.
>
> Problem:
> after freshclam updates, clamddon#t catch the new signatures.
>
> Question:
Jose R. Ortiz Ubarri wrote:
# clamdscan readme.zip
/root/readme.zip: Can't access the file ERROR
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Infected files: 0
Time: 0.001 sec (0 m 0 s)
And everything I try to scan gives me the same ERROR.
I suspect clamd is not running as root, and an ordinary user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
I am finding that when freshclam updates the database and clamd reloads the
database, 2-3 minutes later I get a clamd segmentation fault. This has
happened since at least December, for every version of clamav I have used. I
am currently using
Hi,
I have some problems compiling the latest snapshot
(http://www.clamav.net/snapshot/clamav-devel-20040128.tar.gz).
Here is what happens, I used this compiler:
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.1/specs
gcc version 2.7.2.1
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --disabl
On Wednesday 28 Jan 2004 2:00 pm, james nelson wrote:
> Afirmative. I compiled sendmail with milter support. The .configure
> reported no on milter items, so I manualy built libmilter and installed it.
> Now .configure reports yes on milter items, but still the clamav-milter
> never gets built.
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 at 12:12:59 +, Jo Mills wrote:
>
> I have tried to use freshclam from the cvs version devel-20040127, but
> after 20 minutes it times out. My job shows the following:
>
> > Starting the daily download of the clamAV virus databases to the
> > Labserver at Wed Jan 28 11:39
Actually, it technically is clamscan, but for the installation i used
(www.qmailrocks.org) a step in there says to copy clamscan to clamdscan so
running clamscan and clamdscan effectively means the same thing. So yes
technically you are correct, but for my setup, my statement is correct as
well.
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:57:13 -0700
Spike Ilacqua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And suggestions? The only guess I have is that it's being overwhelmed
> by the volume (this mail server delivers about 50K inbound message per
> day). I'm hopping there is some knob I can turn to help it keep up.
> As
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:55:27AM +0100, Kri?tof Petr wrote:
> Mailing Lists wrote:
>
> >Sure, do you have the src RPM so I can build for RH9 or will Fedora
> >binary work? I am running 0.60, not 0.65
> >
>
> it is not good idea to install fedora binaries on old RH versions.
> Rebuild src packa
hi,
given the flurry of discussion re: clamav on OSX, i though i'd just offer as an fyi, 0.65 builds/runs flawlessly for me
on OSX 10.2.x & 10.3.x on a variety of stock & upgraded boxes.
i can't say i agree with the suggestion that the developers spend their time supporting OSX 10.1.x -- which i
22 matches
Mail list logo
