Re: [clamav-users] scheduled downtime (fwd)

2003-05-02 Thread ODHIAMBO Washington
* Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030502 16:38]: wrote: > Hi, > > I was notified that the main server will be unavailable for some time: > > > - Begin of forwarded message from NERvOus - > > Our server will be moving to a new server farm between the

[clamav-users] scheduled downtime (fwd)

2003-05-02 Thread Tomasz Kojm
Hi, I was notified that the main server will be unavailable for some time: - Begin of forwarded message from NERvOus - Our server will be moving to a new server farm between the evening of May 4th and the morning of May 5th. We'll try to minimize the downtime of sites hosted by elektra

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan & clamd

2003-05-02 Thread Piotr Kasztelowicz
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Seems to me clamscan runs fine without clamd running. So I'm guessing > clamscan is self-sufficient and doesn't rely on clamd. Clamscan is provided to use without clamd - so clamd is not necessary if you decided use clamscan Clamdscan is provided to

Re: [clamav-users] clamav snapshots

2003-05-02 Thread Piotr Kasztelowicz
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How stable are the snapshots? Should I go with stable and steer away from > snapshots? all snapshots - even if called "unstable" really are very stable. I use it on three Sun machines and no problems has been ocured. I recommended you the most new sn