Re[2]: [clamav-users] Clamav and qmail - your experiences and opinions

2003-03-12 Thread Tomasz Nidecki
Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 8:29:51 PM, Cory wrote: This is getting a bit offtopic, but I hope you won't mind... > Applying the QMAILQUEUE patch is extremely easy and simple. > cd qmail-1.03 > wget http://qmail.org/qmailqueue-patch > patch < qmailqueue-patch OK I tried it again and it worked this

Re: [clamav-users] IMPORTANT SECURITY FIX

2003-03-12 Thread Jason Englander
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Magnus Ekdahl wrote: > Can we get this message gpg signed, please ? On that note, Tomasz, would you mind signing the snapshot(s)? Thanks, Jason -- Jason Englander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 394F 7E02 C105 7268 777A 3F5A 0AC0 C618 0675 80CA ---

Re: [clamav-users] IMPORTANT SECURITY FIX

2003-03-12 Thread Magnus Ekdahl
Tomasz Kojm wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Robbert Kouprie found a buffer overflow bug in unrarlib, which is distributed >> with libclamav. Today's snapshot contains his fix and you should update ASAP >> to eliminate that hole. If you don't want to use the prerelease version, please >> overwrite the old

Re: Re[2]: [clamav-users] Clamav and qmail - your experiences and opinions

2003-03-12 Thread Chris van Meerendonk
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 20:01, Tomasz Nidecki wrote: > Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 7:11:27 PM, Jeffrey wrote: > > > I found that Postfix, amavis-new, and clamav ran fine on a 133MHz 486 > > with 40MB RAM. I get 300-500 messages/weekday. > > Hmm, so it's not that bad - I have a Pentium MMX 166 so it

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav and qmail - your experiences and opinions

2003-03-12 Thread Cory Wright
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 07:59:40PM +0100, Tomasz Nidecki wrote: > > qmail + qmail-scanner - modified to use clamdscan instead of clamscan > > should work fine. > > Thx, but qmail-scanner demands a recompilation of qmail with the > qmail-queue patch 8[... Applying the QMAILQUEUE patch is extremely

Re[2]: [clamav-users] Clamav and qmail - your experiences and opinions

2003-03-12 Thread Tomasz Nidecki
Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 7:49:28 PM, Tomasz wrote: >> - not require a recompilation of qmail (would supply a qmail-queue >> script which would call the scanner and then the original qmail-queue) >> >> - take little memory, be streamlined and fast. > qmail + qmail-scanner - modified to use cla

Re[2]: [clamav-users] Clamav and qmail - your experiences and opinions

2003-03-12 Thread Tomasz Nidecki
Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 7:11:27 PM, Jeffrey wrote: > I found that Postfix, amavis-new, and clamav ran fine on a 133MHz 486 > with 40MB RAM. I get 300-500 messages/weekday. Hmm, so it's not that bad - I have a Pentium MMX 166 so it should be allright (and I must expand my RAM soon anyways). -

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav and qmail - your experiences and opinions

2003-03-12 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:55:41PM +0100, Tomasz Nidecki wrote: > - not require a recompilation of qmail (would supply a qmail-queue > script which would call the scanner and then the original qmail-queue) > > - take little memory, be streamlined and fast. qmail + qmail-scanner - modified to use

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav and qmail - your experiences and opinions

2003-03-12 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Quoting Tomasz Nidecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, all 8]. > > I'm currently working on setting up clamav on my server (a small local > network). My MTA is qmail. I was wondering what are your opinions and > experiences with the two working together? > I found that Postfix, amavis-new, and clamav

[clamav-users] Clamav and qmail - your experiences and opinions

2003-03-12 Thread Tomasz Nidecki
Hi, all 8]. I'm currently working on setting up clamav on my server (a small local network). My MTA is qmail. I was wondering what are your opinions and experiences with the two working together? I found two possible options of using clamav with qmail and I was wondering if you know of any others

Re: [clamav-users] IMPORTANT SECURITY FIX

2003-03-12 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Roman Suzi wrote: > Does it affect me if I do not access archives with clamav? You should use --disable-archive in clamscan (see man clamscan) and comment out ScanArchive in clamav.conf. Best regards, Tomasz Kojm -- oo. [EMAIL PROT

Re: [clamav-users] IMPORTANT SECURITY FIX

2003-03-12 Thread Roman Suzi
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > Hello, > > Robbert Kouprie found a buffer overflow bug in unrarlib, which is distributed > with libclamav. Today's snapshot contains his fix and you should update ASAP > to eliminate that hole. If you don't want to use the prerelease version, please > ove

[clamav-users] IMPORTANT SECURITY FIX

2003-03-12 Thread Tomasz Kojm
Hello, Robbert Kouprie found a buffer overflow bug in unrarlib, which is distributed with libclamav. Today's snapshot contains his fix and you should update ASAP to eliminate that hole. If you don't want to use the prerelease version, please overwrite the old file libclamav/unrarlib.c in clamav-0.

[clamav-users] what is that?

2003-03-12 Thread Roman Suzi
I've received ezmlm warning that my address bounces (see below). However, it seems, somebody have tried to send ClamAV-Test-Signature to me, which of course was rejected. I'd liked to know what is it all about? ... Here are the message numbers: 672 --- Enclosed is a copy of the bounce messa