On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 17:18 -0500, John Peacock wrote:
> The whole point is to avoid rewriting the file (for performance
> reasons). To recap, I am trying to integrate clamd into an MTA
> (qpsmtpd) and I already have a file which contains only the body of the
> message, so if I can scan that w
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:18:41 -0500
John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> >
> > Try to define some additional rules in libclamav/filetypes.c or
>
> That was my first attempt. Nigel Horne objected that this would have
> to be subject to regression test; are there reg
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:55:38 -0500
John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just looking for a way to get clamd to scan a file as mail, even
> though the file doesn't meet what you would ordinarily recognize as a
> mail file. I've got files which contain only the MIME body (no
> headers),
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:20:35 -0500
John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would this be a better way to handle it (watch for wrapping)?
>
> --- scanners.c.orig 2005-02-05 10:44:40.0 -0500
> +++ scanners.c 2005-02-25 16:19:15.518625880 -0500
> @@ -1325,6 +1325,10 @@
>
On Thursday, February 24, 2005, at 08:15 pm, John Peacock wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
Please do NOT apply this without thorough checking of the knock-on
effect
of scanning bounces and digest emails.
If I am not understanding the use of the cli_smagic[] construct, please
forgive me. My brief skimm
On Thursday 24 Feb 2005 18:04, John Peacock wrote:
> John Peacock wrote:
>
> > Our current AV package (McAfee's uvscan) has no problem scanning this
> > MIME fragment as is, and I'd like to make ClamAV just as capable.
> > Thoughts???
>
> To reply to my own message, would this be an appropriate
