On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:26:47PM -0300, Aecio F. Neto said:
> I will give it try. Just to understand the big picture here: is there
> any known performance issue in clamav for linux using sparc? Or any
> other option/lib I should be worried about?
There is one that I know of: part of the Port
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 1:26 pm, Aecio F. Neto wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31/05/2005 15:43:22:
> > On Tuesday 31 May 2005 1:03 pm, Aecio F. Neto wrote:
> > > I am using a linux debian under a sparc64 (Sun 4 Ultra - Ultrasparc
>
> II)
>
> > > for a mail gateway system.
> > > This box runs qm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31/05/2005
15:43:22:
> On Tuesday 31 May 2005 1:03 pm, Aecio F. Neto wrote:
> > I am using a linux debian under a sparc64 (Sun 4 Ultra - Ultrasparc
II)
> > for a mail gateway system.
> > This box runs qmail + qmail-scanner + clamav to filter virus
messages.
> >
> > We a
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 1:03 pm, Aecio F. Neto wrote:
> I am using a linux debian under a sparc64 (Sun 4 Ultra - Ultrasparc II)
> for a mail gateway system.
> This box runs qmail + qmail-scanner + clamav to filter virus messages.
>
> We are experiencing a very high load on this box. Diabling qmail-s
I am using a linux debian under a sparc64
(Sun 4 Ultra - Ultrasparc II) for a mail gateway system.
This box runs qmail + qmail-scanner
+ clamav to filter virus messages.
We are experiencing a very high load
on this box. Diabling qmail-scanner (that calls clamd) results in having
this box under ex