On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:26:47PM -0300, Aecio F. Neto said: > I will give it try. Just to understand the big picture here: is there > any known performance issue in clamav for linux using sparc? Or any > other option/lib I should be worried about?
There is one that I know of: part of the Portable Executable routine aligns data on a 32 bit boundary, which means the kernel has to do some memory adjustment on 64 bit platforms. This does slow things down a bit, although not as hugely as what you are seeing. There is a patch in the Debian bug tracking system for this issue, but I have yet to hear back from the team members about it. The patch and report are viewable at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289187 if you want to rule out that issue first. I doubt that will make the kind of difference needed, though. HTH, -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | We are governed not by armies and | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | police but by ideas. -- Mona Caird, | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | 1892 | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
pgpKV5OPezr8g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
