On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote:
https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa
I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple
version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that
created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, an
På Mon, 05 Nov 2012 05:43:49 +0100, skrev Monty Montgomery
:
The real rub in all of this, and the impetus for getting me thinking
to start with, is filter operations using colorspaces with
singularities at black (like HSV). When you don't know where black
is, any HSV operations are wrong at b
On 05/11/12 20:26, Sean M. Pappalardo wrote:
On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote:
https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa
I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple
version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that
created much trou
> ... and presenting 0.0 as black and 1.0 as white internally is
> totally out of the question?
No. :-)
> With your proposed studio swing
> mapping most compositing and filtering operations have to scale
> and bias to work right. E.g. black + black + black will be a
> shade of gray, unless a bi
Ciao!
On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote:
https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa
I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple
version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that
created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now depreca
From: Basil Chupin
To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 5:02:17 AM
Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
On 05/11/12 20:26, Sean M. Pappalardo wrote:
On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote:
>
>https://launchpad.net/~c
I hope this isn't off topic, but for those of us still using SD formats,
we need YUV and not RGB. I tried RGBA for a while, but I always got
artifacts, so I went back to YUV. No artifacts.
Keith
On 11/05/2012 05:27 AM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
... and presenting 0.0 as black and 1.0 as white
På Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:54:15 +0100, skrev Keith Gudger :
I hope this isn't off topic, but for those of us still using SD formats,
we need YUV and not RGB. I tried RGBA for a while, but I always got
artifacts, so I went back to YUV. No artifacts.
RGB8, I presume? The artifacts may be due
BC
Once again, the current cinelerra PPA is compiled from source (CV) for Ubuntu,
in fact it is for pretty much every recent release. The current binaries are
based on the codebase 2.2 with the recent patches. I am not sure why you keep
saying that CV is not compiled from source for CV.
I have
Furthermore, as suggested, if one prefers, compiling cinelerra (either version,
really) it's simple enough.
From: feran...@hotmail.com
To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no
Subject: RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:03:13 -0800
BC
Once again, the current cinelerra PPA i
På Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:27:02 +0100, skrev Monty Montgomery
:
How much is a lot? One conversion entering the pipeline, and another
exiting the pipeline?
Any color filters that expect to operate on R'G'B' rather than RGB. I
think in most cases, these operations only work on R'G'B' to avoid t
> I suppose linear light is the "native" space of many (most?) common
> operations. Blurring and resampling/scaling will get funny shifts
> in brightness if they operate on non-linear samples, for example.
Yes, full agreement. But given that many [most] tools don't operate
in linear space, users
Due to the confusion over the two repositories, I am updating the cinelerra-cv
ppa with the latest builds (currently building, available in a few hours):
A: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/cinelerra-cv
The only difference (to the user) between these builds and those in the main PPA
On 11/05/2012 02:02 PM, Basil Chupin wrote:
The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one way, of
the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what it
considers to be relevant to it aims.
Okay, so we needn't worry about the different version numbers then? So
Cin
På Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:02:17 +0100, skrev Basil Chupin :
The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one
way, of the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what
it considers to be relevant to it aims.
Nope. CinHV used to be "upstream", which CinCV _fo
Ciao!
> And CinCV broke off with upstream after CinHV 4.0, because
merging became hard. Since then CinCV must have fallen
behind quite considerably,
I don't think so.
They diverged.
CV has some feature that are not in HV
and HV has some features that are not on CV.
A clear distinction on the
If anyone can assist me with this error (2) trying to build cinelerra usiong
external ffmpeg
see error below and thanks :0:0:0
2 -MT qtffmpeg.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/qtffmpeg.Tpo -c qtffmpeg.c -o
.libs/qtffmpeg.o
qtffmpeg.c: In function 'quicktime_new_ffmpeg':
qtffmpeg.c:71:3: warning: 'avcodec
I also tried to do a build without usiong the external ffmpeg and that make
went thruough without errors but the make install had the following errors
so now I have no cinelerra on my ubuntu 12.10 at all :(
libtool: relink: gcc -shared -fPIC -DPIC .libs/atom.o .libs/avcc.o
.libs/avi_hdrl.o .li
On 06/11/12 03:03, Nicola Ferralis wrote:
BC
Once again, the current cinelerra PPA is compiled from source (CV) for
Ubuntu, in fact it is for pretty much every recent release. The
current binaries are based on the codebase 2.2 with the recent
patches. I am not sure why you keep saying that CV
On 06/11/12 02:21, Murray Strome wrote:
*From:* Basil Chupin
*To:* cinelerra@skolelinux.no
*Sent:* Monday, November 5, 2012 5:02:17 AM
*Subject:* Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
On 05/11/12 20:26, Sean M. Pappalard
Basil,
If you refer to packages in in the official Ubuntu repositories, well you won't
find any. That is why I made the PPA in first place.
Regarding cinelerra.org, I don't really know what is in the official website
other than links to various sources. All I know is that the PPA offers builds
21 matches
Mail list logo
