David,
Administrators can set the lists up so that replies go to the author, or to
the list, or both, or "user decides" - moments ago I just set my
googlegroups list to "user decides" because if I don't set it that way the
author's email address is hidden - even from me - the list owner!
Email li
Ok another question,
If I am responding to a post do I use "reply" or do I use "reply list"?
I use Thunderbird for email.
David
On 3/31/2020 10:21 AM, NE1EE - Rich wrote:
> David asked if I got a new thread...so I logged into the email package to
> see. NO...my "new" subject is under a thread
Unless references are removed from the
headers, it will not become a new thread. Best to start with a
completely new message. Most email clients hide most of the header
information. This is standard email behavior.
Paul / AC0HY
On 3
I don't even want to know, why you are trying to reinvent the wheel.
Dennis M. Wage (W9BOQ)
245 Corum Hill Road
Castalian Springs, TN 37031
(615) 310-4242 Cell
(615) 562-5128 Home
http://hammondb3organ.net
http://overdubs.net
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:23 AM NE1EE - Rich wrote:
> David asked
Another thought. If this phenomenon of missing the first couple of words
happens when communication with a paticular individual, then perhaps that
individual is "Quick Keying", or not fully engaging the PTT on their radio
before speaking. If this seems to be the case, encourage them to consci
This is relating to the discussion about...
>> "I am using a UV-5RA and it has about a sec delay before I hear the
other person talk is this normal or is there a setting someplace that I can
change? A real pain as it cuts off the other persons one or 2 first words."
I've followed the discussion b
David asked if I got a new thread...so I logged into the email package to see.
NO...my "new" subject is under a thread of
Yaesu FT-7100
Baofeng UV-5RA
showing the hijacked message
My message appears in the same 5RA thread.
I was under the impression that, though the standard called out the us
Rick:
When you edit the subject of an email so that it LOOKS as if it is a new
thread, it does not change the internal header information.
Your header still contains information that indicates it is a "Reply to"
message.
This is what is in your header:
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Versio
Rich,
So did it work? Did you get a brand new thread? I can't tell because I
deleted the old messages.
73
David
N1EA
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020, 08:46 NE1EE - Rich wrote:
> Not quite what I received...
>
> On 2020-03-31 07:26:-0500, you wrote:
> >And I thought that is what I did? Deleted all the ol
Not quite what I received...
On 2020-03-31 07:26:-0500, you wrote:
>And I thought that is what I did? Deleted all the old text
Yup...looked very clean.
> and put a new
>subject.
Mine still said "Re: [chirp_users] Baofeng UV-5RA"
which I didn't mind, as you were replying to a thread.
I just had
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:27 AM David wrote:
> And I thought that is what I did? Deleted all the old text and put a new
> subject.
>
Perhaps missed changing the subject? Most email clients will create a new
thread if the subject is manually changed but that should really be
reserved for WAS conv
And I thought that is what I did? Deleted all the old text and put a new
subject.
On 3/31/2020 6:51 AM, NE1EE - Rich wrote:
> This is a test of another method of replying and getting a new subject.
> I replied to the message I got, but I changed the subject completely, then
> wrote my message.
>
This is a test of another method of replying and getting a new subject.
I replied to the message I got, but I changed the subject completely, then
wrote my message.
I could have deleted Dave's part, but I wanted to retain relevance for this
post.
This is an experiment...I guess that we all will s
Thanks for posting this. Not only is hijacking rude, but then not deleting the
no longer relevant material adds to the confusion.
~R~
73 de Rich NE1EE
On the banks of the Piscataqua
On 2020-03-30 18:47:-0400, you wrote:
>In the future when you want to address the group with a question, please st
Thanks for reposting this so clearly. It is unfortunate that our "reflex" seems
to be to skip that first step.
I do something similar:
TH-D72A as found 20200320
then
TH-D72A HAM NOAA 20200327a
TH-D72A HAM NOAA FRS GMRS MURS SL 20200327a
TH-D72A HAM NOAA FRS GMRS MURS SL 20200327b
so that the sav
15 matches
Mail list logo
