@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+
+set(CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS "-lclang_rt.builtins-hexagon -nostdlib" CACHE
STRING "")
+set(CMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-lclang_rt.builtins-hexagon -nostdlib" CACHE
STRING "")
+set(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_TARGET hexagon-unknown-linux-musl CACHE STRING "")
+
+set(LLVM_
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+
+set(CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS "-lclang_rt.builtins-hexagon -nostdlib" CACHE
STRING "")
+set(CMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-lclang_rt.builtins-hexagon -nostdlib" CACHE
STRING "")
ldionne wrote:
Why are those flags necessary when building for Hexago
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90803
>From ecab1e5689f9f7ea6f87d9cc8c51910b733f6859 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 18:10:07 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [libc++][WIP] Move the libc++ test format to Lit
This allows the g
https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request.
Let's try this again. Thanks for your perseverance, this is obviously not easy
to land but it's important to get it done. Let's hope everything has been
addressed this time around.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90373
__
ldionne wrote:
> @ldionne, do you find @arichardson reasoning good enough to proceed with
> merging this PR?
I'm not convinced. We use `#include ` pretty consistently in libc++ and
libc++abi and we should strive for all the runtimes to be consistent. I am
especially not convinced that the end
@@ -0,0 +1,355 @@
+#
===--===##
+#
+# Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+# See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90803
>From 4871a82495e0056483759fa207ffbecd63b1e2f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 18:10:07 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [libc++][WIP] Move the libc++ test format to Lit
This allows the g
https://github.com/ldionne created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93233
1. Remove the format-checking job from the BuildKite pipeline. We now have a
monorepo-wide format checker implemented with Github Actions, so that should
not be necessary anymore.
2. Stop building and testing C
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93233
>From 89afeebd55e0ae1167f5af803eb192b73a6e6799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 15:31:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][ci] Remove unnecessary BuildKite jobs for Clang
1. Re
ldionne wrote:
> Do we even need to build Clang and run libc++ jobs? I don't even see them
> linked in libc++ PR, even besides the fact that I think libc++ is fully
> tested with GitHub Actions.
What we're testing is that the changes to Clang didn't break libc++. We're
testing Clang via libc+
ldionne wrote:
I will merge once the CI has passed. If someone else sees the CI green, feel
free to merge too.
@Endilll We could indeed "flatten" the `clang-ci` pipeline into the
`github-pull-requests` pipeline. Basically, instead of triggering the
`clang-ci` pipeline like this:
https://gith
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93318
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93318
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -54,3 +54,68 @@ cmake -S "${MONOREPO_ROOT}"/llvm -B "${BUILD_DIR}" \
echo "--- ninja"
# Targets are not escaped as they are passed as separate arguments.
ninja -C "${BUILD_DIR}" -k 0 ${targets}
+
ldionne wrote:
I don't think it makes sense to serialize all
https://github.com/ldionne requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93318
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -54,3 +54,68 @@ cmake -S "${MONOREPO_ROOT}"/llvm -B "${BUILD_DIR}" \
echo "--- ninja"
# Targets are not escaped as they are passed as separate arguments.
ninja -C "${BUILD_DIR}" -k 0 ${targets}
+
+runtimes="${3}"
+runtime_targets="${4}"
+
+# Compiling runtimes with just-buil
@@ -54,3 +54,68 @@ cmake -S "${MONOREPO_ROOT}"/llvm -B "${BUILD_DIR}" \
echo "--- ninja"
# Targets are not escaped as they are passed as separate arguments.
ninja -C "${BUILD_DIR}" -k 0 ${targets}
+
+runtimes="${3}"
+runtime_targets="${4}"
+
+# Compiling runtimes with just-buil
@@ -54,3 +54,68 @@ cmake -S "${MONOREPO_ROOT}"/llvm -B "${BUILD_DIR}" \
echo "--- ninja"
# Targets are not escaped as they are passed as separate arguments.
ninja -C "${BUILD_DIR}" -k 0 ${targets}
+
ldionne wrote:
It seems that we disagree on the approach take
@@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
-#===--===##
ldionne wrote:
`clang/utils/ci/run-buildbot` can be removed too, I think.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93318
__
@@ -3058,6 +3058,133 @@ void Sema::NoteAllFoundTemplates(TemplateName Name) {
}
}
+static QualType commonTypeImpl(Sema &S, TemplateName BaseTemplate,
+ SourceLocation TemplateLoc,
+ ArrayRef Ts) {
+ auto lookUpComm
@@ -1511,6 +1511,46 @@ Attributes (N2335)
C2
``#embed`` (N3017)
C23 C89, C++
===
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -verify
+
+#if !__has_cpp_attribute(clang::diagnose_specializations)
+# error
+#endif
+
+struct [[clang::diagnose_specializations]] S {}; // expected-warning
{{'diagnose_specializations' attribute only applies to class templates}}
+
+templ
ldionne wrote:
> @ldionne I'm starting to think that we should have a generic module in
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/main/cmake/Modules that would be
> controlled by `LLVM_USE_LIBC` and define `libc-headers`, `libc-static` and
> `libc-shared`. That way we could avoid duplicating
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+#===
ldionne wrote:
For now, can't you include `libcxx/cmake/Modules/HandleLibC.cmake` instead?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101688
___
Author: PoYao Chang
Date: 2021-12-16T13:32:40-05:00
New Revision: 1c4867e6fc507fe6e81cfc0e3c7148307b4b7433
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1c4867e6fc507fe6e81cfc0e3c7148307b4b7433
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1c4867e6fc507fe6e81cfc0e3c7148307b4b7433.diff
L
Author: Louis Dionne
Date: 2021-10-05T19:45:50-04:00
New Revision: 54a8a0d09a572a0581c0755541847e016274e15c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/54a8a0d09a572a0581c0755541847e016274e15c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/54a8a0d09a572a0581c0755541847e016274e15c.diff
Author: Louis Dionne
Date: 2021-10-06T11:25:26-04:00
New Revision: 60fe1f59d08b815a280761e625d12a74a501f444
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/60fe1f59d08b815a280761e625d12a74a501f444
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/60fe1f59d08b815a280761e625d12a74a501f444.diff
Author: Louis Dionne
Date: 2021-10-13T08:02:31-04:00
New Revision: df3de7647e034797ae3c965d6737bc0a4bc7a779
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df3de7647e034797ae3c965d6737bc0a4bc7a779
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df3de7647e034797ae3c965d6737bc0a4bc7a779.diff
Author: Louis Dionne
Date: 2021-10-19T12:03:58-04:00
New Revision: 6fd55bba61bb4df98f9485b8d3cfc9e956d992b8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6fd55bba61bb4df98f9485b8d3cfc9e956d992b8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6fd55bba61bb4df98f9485b8d3cfc9e956d992b8.diff
Author: Louis Dionne
Date: 2021-10-20T08:45:58-04:00
New Revision: 5a8ad80b6fa5cbad58b78384f534b78fca863e7f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5a8ad80b6fa5cbad58b78384f534b78fca863e7f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5a8ad80b6fa5cbad58b78384f534b78fca863e7f.diff
Author: Louis Dionne
Date: 2021-10-20T17:40:23-04:00
New Revision: 070a2ddcb6657f1b497b8003384bae31e27e497d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/070a2ddcb6657f1b497b8003384bae31e27e497d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/070a2ddcb6657f1b497b8003384bae31e27e497d.diff
Author: Louis Dionne
Date: 2021-10-22T14:36:14-04:00
New Revision: e6f39c8b4891242c0d0d8e7a78041614d9bcdefc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6f39c8b4891242c0d0d8e7a78041614d9bcdefc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6f39c8b4891242c0d0d8e7a78041614d9bcdefc.diff
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80007
>From ad17e287c4ceed5d6148d52cbb0ed31fd0d04e99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:06:32 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [runtimes] Always define cxx_shared, cxx_static & other
targets
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# This testing configuration handles running the test suite against LLVM's
libc++
+# using a static library.
+#
+# This configuration uses a 'just-built' Clang runtime builtins library to
link with
+# the tests instead of the target system library.
+#
+# Provid
ldionne wrote:
Ping @petrhosek @vitalybuka. I would like to merge this patch this week. CI
seems to be happy, but your CI may be doing something different since IIRC this
patch upset your bots the last time I tried landing it. Can you take it for a
round to see if that's still the case?
https
ldionne wrote:
Thanks for the writeup, this is useful. This leaves me wondering if
`arm64-apple-darwin22.4.0` might be the right target triple then, but the
effective triple would be e.g. `arm64-apple-macos12.0.0`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104037
__
https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105616
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldionne wrote:
@hokein @vvereschaka Yeah, I get the same conclusion as you. I think that's a
false positive, this is just moving the content of an engaged `std::optional`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104906
___
cfe-commits mailing list
c
https://github.com/ldionne commented:
I did a very cursory review and this seems good to me, the tests seem to cover
what the paper was intending to provide.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91895
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@list
@@ -0,0 +1,431 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -Wno-unused %s -verify=expected,cxx20
-Wno-vla-cxx-extension
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -Wno-unused %s -verify=expected,sincecxx23
-Wno-vla-cxx-extension
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++26 -Wno-unused %s -verify=expected,sincecxx2
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91895
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldionne wrote:
The libc++ part: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105847
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100393
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,431 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -Wno-unused %s -verify=expected,cxx20
-Wno-vla-cxx-extension
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -Wno-unused %s -verify=expected,sincecxx23
-Wno-vla-cxx-extension
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++26 -Wno-unused %s -verify=expected,sincecxx2
ldionne wrote:
Gentle ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101688
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ def sync_csv(rows: List[Tuple], from_github:
List[PaperInfo]) -> List[Tuple]:
results.append(gh.for_printing())
continue
elif paper.status != gh.status:
-print(f"We found a CSV row and a Github issue with differen
https://github.com/ldionne requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105990
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldionne wrote:
@h-vetinari This one still looks like a real issue:
https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/github-pull-requests/builds/74912#01903ca1-8089-4388-afdb-b65d400e6315
The rest looks good indeed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96171
_
ldionne wrote:
I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but it looks like Android is failing
with this patch:
https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/builds/35981#01905269-56a0-4314-a350-0b99ece37e89
This is kinda weird, it fails due to the ABI list changing. I checked other
recent execut
Author: Louis Dionne
Date: 2024-06-26T15:44:28-05:00
New Revision: eeb931641ae735faa25283ddb2465318302e864f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eeb931641ae735faa25283ddb2465318302e864f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eeb931641ae735faa25283ddb2465318302e864f.diff
@@ -38,9 +38,13 @@ check_cxx_compiler_flag(-nolibc CXX_SUPPORTS_NOLIBC_FLAG)
# required during compilation (which has the -nostdlib++ or -nodefaultlibs).
libc is
# required for the link to go through. We remove sanitizers from the
# configuration checks to avoid spurious link
ldionne wrote:
I don't think this is very controversial so I'll land now that the CI has run.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107905
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-c
https://github.com/ldionne closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107905
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111007
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80007
>From 447159a21d73d6b4b5c6f6c4710231f01e0af4fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:06:32 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [runtimes] Always define cxx_shared, cxx_static & other
targets
ldionne wrote:
Amazing to see this paying off!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111581
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldionne wrote:
@petrhosek Where is the cache generating that build?
The fix for this is:
```
# On embedded platforms that don't support shared library targets, CMake
implicitly changes shared
# library targets to be static library targets. This results in duplicate
definitions of the static
#
https://github.com/ldionne closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80007
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldionne wrote:
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111791
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111821
This is a purely mechanical commit for fixing the indentation of the runtimes'
CMakeLists files after #80007. That PR didn't update the indentation in order
to make the diff easier to review and for merge confl
ldionne wrote:
I had to fix how we were excluding targets from `EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL`, which
didn't work as intended and was breaking the MinGW CI. I'll merge this if the
CI passes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80007
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80007
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldionne wrote:
If other folks get here because of an error like `multiple rules generate
lib/SOMETHING.a`, this is the issue (from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80007#issuecomment-2402188675):
>
> The fix for this is:
>
> ```
> # On embedded platforms that don't support shared li
ldionne wrote:
Can you explain again why the compiler isn't providing the C library and the
start files implicitly by default, just like it does for non-GPU code?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commi
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112978
>From a57278b0c6a34dda5b937bae2e37c5c57855ac9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 09:26:01 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [libc++] Replace LIBCXX_ENABLE_STATIC_ABI_LIBRARY &
friends
https://github.com/ldionne closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112733
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112717
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldionne wrote:
@ilovepi Some things that *could* be going wrong: The `cxx_shared` target is
now defined when it wasn't before, and something in your CMake has e.g. `if
(TARGET cxx_shared)` and does something it shouldn't based on that.
Otherwise, it's also possible that `libc++.so` doesn't get
ldionne wrote:
Also, this is another reminder that we would benefit from having Fuchsia
builders in the pre-commit CI. We've asked before and we'll keep asking until
we get them: Fuchsia is amongst the last platform that frequently reports
errors but doesn't provide us with any pre-commit visi
ldionne wrote:
Converting to draft since this is for discussion only.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111861
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111861
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111821
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ldionne closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldionne wrote:
> > This can be merged by whoever sees the CI green first.
>
> There are 6 failing build so far but all due to the "runner received a
> shutdown signal", not actually a build/test failure? Should I do another
> rebase to trigger a rerun? Or we can just land it now?
Merged since
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112978
>From 85bac5f281c3d6038eda67eb8c0faf356a51c621 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 09:26:01 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [libc++] Replace LIBCXX_ENABLE_STATIC_ABI_LIBRARY &
friends
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/ldionne edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111861
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/ldionne commented:
Thanks a lot, I think this is a really promising proposal. I would love to have
something like that in the standard library.
I think the main thing that's still missing he
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= ,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exce
https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108357
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldionne wrote:
Trying to understand what this patch does, basically it adds a summary when
looking at the results of a BuildKite job?
Previously:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62dcabf5-414d-4c6b-928d-55df39ca02e0";>
After this patch:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/489b
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101399
>From cb6359e96c6fd2c2af90f84c32487977a6e1b819 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:00:25 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [libc++] Make benchmarks forward-compatible with the test
su
ldionne wrote:
> The script is already written and works, and there still isn't a concrete
> timeline for when we are going to move things over to Github actions. This
> solves a valid complaint I hear somewhat often. For libc++ at least, there
> are definitely platforms that will not be able
ldionne wrote:
FWIW, I didn't mean to derail this effort or create significant additional
complexity by saying what I said above. My intention was only to point out the
tradeoff of adding new functionality for a temporary benefit, which wasn't
clear to me had been thought about in those terms.
ldionne wrote:
> Looking at our current cmake config, we're using:
>
> ```
> -DLIBCXX_STATICALLY_LINK_ABI_IN_STATIC_LIBRARY=ON \
> -DLIBCXX_ENABLE_ABI_LINKER_SCRIPT=ON \
> ```
>
> Do I understand correctly that the new replacement for that would be?
>
> ```
> -DLIBCXX_ABILIB_FOR_SHARED="shared
ldionne wrote:
Both CI failures seem to be unrelated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112741
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -230,11 +230,22 @@ else()
endif()
set(LIBCXX_SUPPORTED_ABI_LIBRARIES none libcxxabi system-libcxxabi libcxxrt
libstdc++ libsupc++ vcruntime)
-set(LIBCXX_CXX_ABI "${LIBCXX_DEFAULT_ABI_LIBRARY}" CACHE STRING "Specify C++
ABI library to use. Supported values are ${LIBCXX_SUP
@@ -230,11 +230,22 @@ else()
endif()
set(LIBCXX_SUPPORTED_ABI_LIBRARIES none libcxxabi system-libcxxabi libcxxrt
libstdc++ libsupc++ vcruntime)
-set(LIBCXX_CXX_ABI "${LIBCXX_DEFAULT_ABI_LIBRARY}" CACHE STRING "Specify C++
ABI library to use. Supported values are ${LIBCXX_SUP
701 - 800 of 937 matches
Mail list logo
