ldionne wrote: > Do we even need to build Clang and run libc++ jobs? I don't even see them > linked in libc++ PR, even besides the fact that I think libc++ is fully > tested with GitHub Actions.
What we're testing is that the changes to Clang didn't break libc++. We're testing Clang via libc++ -- we're not testing libc++ itself. So yes, this is still relevant. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93233 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
