@@ -1351,7 +1352,8 @@ def OSConsumesThis : InheritableAttr {
def Cleanup : InheritableAttr {
let Spellings = [GCC<"cleanup">];
- let Args = [DeclArgument];
+ let Args = [DeclArgument,
+ ExprArgument<"Expr", /*opt=*/0, /*fake=*/1>];
DaanDeMeyer
@@ -74,7 +75,51 @@ static std::unique_ptr
NamespaceTemplate = nullptr;
static std::unique_ptr RecordTemplate = nullptr;
+static Error
+setupTemplate(std::unique_ptr &Template,
+ StringRef TemplatePath,
+ std::vector> Partials) {
+ auto T = Mustache
@@ -6,4 +6,6 @@ set(LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
add_clang_library(clangDocSupport STATIC
File.cpp
- )
\ No newline at end of file
+ Utils.cpp
+ )
+
ilovepi wrote:
one would hope `git calng-format would catch this...`. Will fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pro
andykaylor wrote:
This corresponds to the incubator PR at
https://github.com/llvm/clangir/pull/1629
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140612
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apac
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140612
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -6,4 +6,6 @@ set(LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
add_clang_library(clangDocSupport STATIC
File.cpp
- )
\ No newline at end of file
+ Utils.cpp
+ )
+
ilovepi wrote:
oh, CMake file ... 🤦
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138062
__
ahatanak wrote:
> Looks like a bug to me. This warning presumably ought to be checking whether
> it's valid to read / write to the given location using something like
> [`isUserWritingOffTheEnd`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b2e2ae8702e9fbbe0ef0eb5929aa2d5dc867b1c5/clang/lib/AST/Ex
https://github.com/DaanDeMeyer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137840
>From 6a3e7f091fbb8bc7117f5ef1d2803e73b8c6f061 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daan De Meyer
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:26:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] clang-format: Add IgnoreExtension option to
SortIncludesOpt
@@ -542,8 +542,15 @@ CIRGenTypes::arrangeCIRFunctionInfo(CanQualType returnType,
void *insertPos = nullptr;
CIRGenFunctionInfo *fi = functionInfos.FindNodeOrInsertPos(id, insertPos);
- if (fi)
+ if (fi) {
+// We found a matching function info based on id. These asser
Author: Andres-Salamanca
Date: 2025-05-19T13:52:21-07:00
New Revision: 114e4508b2fd8df34740572383e749f3184a2a89
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/114e4508b2fd8df34740572383e749f3184a2a89
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/114e4508b2fd8df34740572383e749f3184a2a89.di
https://github.com/andykaylor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140457
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
qinkunbao wrote:
> This patch should be "[NFC] Precommit test for src:*=sanitize for UBSan" (or
> similar), have the test output "passing" for the current build of clang
> (i.e., probably "incorrect" output), reviewed and then merged.
Thank you for your feedback. However, I recommend against m
sivadeilra wrote:
I've updated the PR so that the COFF debugging tests pass. I had to run the
hot-patching pass a little earlier, so that it ran before the CodeViewDebug
pass.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138972
___
cfe-commits mailing
ziqingluo-90 wrote:
hi, what is the motivation of changing `std::sort` to `llvm:sort`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140337
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rupprecht wrote:
This PR seems to regress this test case:
```c++
template
void f(T&) noexcept;
template
void f(T (&arr)[N]) noexcept(noexcept(f(*arr)));
template
inline void f(T&) noexcept {}
template
inline void f(T (&arr)[N]) noexcept(noexcept(f(*arr))) {}
void g() {
int x[1];
@@ -1038,6 +1038,37 @@ mlir::LogicalResult
CIRToLLVMGlobalOpLowering::matchAndRewrite(
return mlir::success();
}
+mlir::LogicalResult CIRToLLVMSwitchFlatOpLowering::matchAndRewrite(
+cir::SwitchFlatOp op, OpAdaptor adaptor,
+mlir::ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter
@@ -1038,6 +1038,37 @@ mlir::LogicalResult
CIRToLLVMGlobalOpLowering::matchAndRewrite(
return mlir::success();
}
+mlir::LogicalResult CIRToLLVMSwitchFlatOpLowering::matchAndRewrite(
+cir::SwitchFlatOp op, OpAdaptor adaptor,
+mlir::ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter
https://github.com/andykaylor edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140425
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/andykaylor commented:
Looks good. Just a few nits.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140425
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1038,6 +1038,37 @@ mlir::LogicalResult
CIRToLLVMGlobalOpLowering::matchAndRewrite(
return mlir::success();
}
+mlir::LogicalResult CIRToLLVMSwitchFlatOpLowering::matchAndRewrite(
+cir::SwitchFlatOp op, OpAdaptor adaptor,
+mlir::ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter
@@ -1038,6 +1038,37 @@ mlir::LogicalResult
CIRToLLVMGlobalOpLowering::matchAndRewrite(
return mlir::success();
}
+mlir::LogicalResult CIRToLLVMSwitchFlatOpLowering::matchAndRewrite(
+cir::SwitchFlatOp op, OpAdaptor adaptor,
+mlir::ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter
zygoloid wrote:
> Should `foo` in the following code return 4 when `-fstrict-flex-arrays` is 2
> or 3 (but not when it's 0 or 1) only when the target is `-std=c++23` or
> newer? Or should it return 4 for older standards too?
We evaluate the operand of `__builtin_object_size` in `EM_IgnoreSideE
@@ -1500,6 +1507,14 @@ static void prepareTypeConverter(mlir::LLVMTypeConverter
&converter,
converter.addConversion([&](cir::BF16Type type) -> mlir::Type {
return mlir::BFloat16Type::get(type.getContext());
});
+ converter.addConversion([&](cir::FuncType type) -> mlir
thurstond wrote:
> The linked pull request (#140529) introduces a new feature rather than
> correcting a bug.
I would argue that since the `src:*=sanitize` syntax could reasonably be
expected to work, but it did not work, then that is both a missing feature and
a bug (not working as intended)
https://github.com/spall created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140627
In 'EmitStoreThroughExtVectorComponentLValue', move the code which ZExts in the
case the Destination Scalar Type is larger than the Source Scalar Type, to the
top of the function, to ensure each condition is hand
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl
Author: Sarah Spall (spall)
Changes
In 'EmitStoreThroughExtVectorComponentLValue', move the code which ZExts in the
case the Destination Scalar Type is larger than the Source Scalar Type, to the
top of the function, to ensure each condition is han
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Sarah Spall (spall)
Changes
In 'EmitStoreThroughExtVectorComponentLValue', move the code which ZExts in the
case the Destination Scalar Type is larger than the Source Scalar Type, to the
top of the function, to ensure each conditi
@@ -587,3 +587,118 @@ void foo11() {
// OGCG: %[[TMP_B:.*]] = load <4 x i32>, ptr %[[VEC_B]], align 16
// OGCG: %[[XOR:.*]] = xor <4 x i32> %[[TMP_A]], %[[TMP_B]]
// OGCG: store <4 x i32> %[[XOR]], ptr {{.*}}, align 16
+
+void foo12() {
andykaylor wrote:
Can y
@@ -2083,4 +2083,33 @@ def VecExtractOp : CIR_Op<"vec.extract", [Pure,
let hasFolder = 1;
}
+//===--===//
+// VecCmpOp
+//===--===//
+
+def
https://github.com/andykaylor commented:
This looks OK, but I have a basic question about whether we need a dedicated
vector operation here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140597
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
https://github.com/andykaylor edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140597
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Andy Kaylor
Date: 2025-05-19T14:42:50-07:00
New Revision: a0c515a9ef3be780e2dfd64d86de9e401b137b28
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a0c515a9ef3be780e2dfd64d86de9e401b137b28
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a0c515a9ef3be780e2dfd64d86de9e401b137b28.diff
L
https://github.com/andykaylor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140290
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
krzysz00 wrote:
@arsenm You're right that it might be better to emit the offset, but all the
existing intrinsics that I'm abstracting over _do_ have such a field.
If you want to add new intrinsics that don't have the offset and that
pattern-match instead, I'd be more than happy to review that
https://github.com/llvm-beanz approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140627
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
>From 210f005ecccbbd4fed439d3e156d5e0146807bed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qinkun Bao
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 19:49:33 +
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?=
=?U
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140629
This patch enhances Clang's diagnosis for unknown attributes by providing typo
correction suggestions for known attributes.
```cpp
[[gmu::deprected]] // expected-warning {{unknown attribute 'gmu::deprected'
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow
-fsanitize-ignorelist=%t/src.ignorelist -emit-llvm %t/test1.c -o - | FileCheck
%s -check-prefix=CHECK-ALLOWLIST
vitalybu
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow
-fsanitize-ignorelist=%t/src.ignorelist -emit-llvm %t/test1.c -o - | FileCheck
%s -check-prefix=CHECK-ALLOWLIST
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -trip
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Oleksandr T. (a-tarasyuk)
Changes
This patch enhances Clang's diagnosis for unknown attributes by providing typo
correction suggestions for known attributes.
```cpp
[[gmu::deprected]] // expected-warning {{unknown attribute 'gmu::deprecte
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow
-fsanitize-ignorelist=%t/src.ignorelist -emit-llvm %t/test1.c -o -
| FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK1,IGNORE
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow
-fsanitize-ignorelist=%t/src.ignorelist -emit-llvm %t/test1.c -o -
| FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK1,IGNORE
+// RUN: %cl
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions h,cpp,c --
clang/include/clang/Basic/SimpleTypoCorrection.h
vitalybuka wrote:
> > The linked pull request (#140529) introduces a new feature rather than
> > correcting a bug.
>
> I would argue that since the `src:*=sanitize` syntax could reasonably be
> expected to work, but it did not work, then that is both a missing feature
> and a bug (not working
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
vitalybuka wrote:
THe point of SPR to have stacked PR, so this one will already be rebased on
#140602
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140629
>From 5b8f0635fdddc87ea326a3b1b47191ab9bf23c0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr Tarasiuk
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 00:38:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] add typo correction for unknown attribute na
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
>From b83755d2aa0c5417ab8f359aa842449213437a7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qinkun Bao
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:14:01 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?U
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
>From 210f005ecccbbd4fed439d3e156d5e0146807bed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qinkun Bao
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 19:49:33 +
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?=
=?U
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
vitalybuka wrote:
But in this case we failed to do so, if reordering of patches is needed, SPR
often fails.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing
arsenm wrote:
> If you want to add new intrinsics that don't have the offset and that
> pattern-match instead, I'd be more than happy to review that - or if we want
> to break back-compat by getting rid of the offset.
I don't think we need to worry about compatibility with an intrinsic that's
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
>From 210f005ecccbbd4fed439d3e156d5e0146807bed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qinkun Bao
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 19:49:33 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?U
https://github.com/andykaylor approved this pull request.
I think this looks good once the error handling on the type conversion is fixed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139748
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
>From b83755d2aa0c5417ab8f359aa842449213437a7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qinkun Bao
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:14:01 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?U
@@ -2927,6 +2928,20 @@ void Verifier::visitFunction(const Function &F) {
"Calling convention does not support varargs or "
"perfect forwarding!",
&F);
+if (F.getCallingConv() == CallingConv::PTX_Kernel &&
+TT.getOS() == Triple::CUDA) {
https://github.com/Artem-B edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138706
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hekota edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139985
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/thurstond approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Qinkun Bao
Date: 2025-05-19T15:22:13-07:00
New Revision: 91a45a33fca6f372933c6c796e0cc40f82d4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/91a45a33fca6f372933c6c796e0cc40f82d4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/91a45a33fca6f372933c6c796e0cc40f82d4.diff
LO
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
>From b83755d2aa0c5417ab8f359aa842449213437a7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qinkun Bao
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:14:01 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?U
@@ -44,6 +44,12 @@ bool NoSanitizeList::containsFunction(SanitizerMask Mask,
bool NoSanitizeList::containsFile(SanitizerMask Mask, StringRef FileName,
StringRef Category) const {
+ unsigned NoSanLine = SSCL->inSectionBlame(Mask, "src", FileNa
https://github.com/andykaylor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140636
This change adds handling for C++ member operator calls, implicit no-op casts,
and l-value call expressions. Together, these changes enable handling of range
for loops based on iterators.
>From 58b8700c4b43
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor)
Changes
This change adds handling for C++ member operator calls, implicit no-op casts,
and l-value call expressions. Together, these changes enable handling of range
for loops based on iterators.
---
Full diff: h
https://github.com/bcardosolopes approved this pull request.
Great, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140586
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,17 +1,16 @@
// RUN: rm -rf %t
// RUN: split-file %s %t
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow
-fsanitize-ignorelist=%t/src.ignorelist -emit-llvm %t/test1.c -o -
| FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK1,IGNORE
+// RUN: %c
https://github.com/hekota edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139985
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1500,6 +1507,14 @@ static void prepareTypeConverter(mlir::LLVMTypeConverter
&converter,
converter.addConversion([&](cir::BF16Type type) -> mlir::Type {
return mlir::BFloat16Type::get(type.getContext());
});
+ converter.addConversion([&](cir::FuncType type) -> mlir
https://github.com/bcardosolopes approved this pull request.
LGTM (pending error propagation)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139748
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-c
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -135,4 +135,38 @@ cir.func @vector_insert_element_test() {
// CHECK:cir.return
// CHECK: }
+cir.func @vector_splat_test() {
+%0 = cir.alloca !cir.vector<4 x !s32i>, !cir.ptr>,
["a", init]
+%1 = cir.alloca !cir.vector<4 x !s32i>, !cir.ptr>,
["shl", init]
+
vitalybuka wrote:
llvm-project/clang/docs/SanitizerSpecialCaseList.rst needs to be updated
And nice to mention in llvm-project/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.
HighCommander4 wrote:
> @kleinesfilmroellchen @HighCommander4 would it be possible to take a look
> when you have some time? Many thanks!
Yep, will do. Added myself as reviewer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140594
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140007
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2025-05-19T15:42:59-07:00
New Revision: b93bc773f86b3746f8023c5dda9a8ab892fa0499
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b93bc773f86b3746f8023c5dda9a8ab892fa0499
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b93bc773f86b3746f8023c5dda9a8ab892fa0499.diff
L
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2025-05-19T15:45:43-07:00
New Revision: 5db4aeae3c413d586faed03771626818d6a807a9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5db4aeae3c413d586faed03771626818d6a807a9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5db4aeae3c413d586faed03771626818d6a807a9.diff
L
Author: Erich Keane
Date: 2025-05-19T15:47:26-07:00
New Revision: f171e050411efbed46c483db6d4dff7814e2d3e4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f171e050411efbed46c483db6d4dff7814e2d3e4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f171e050411efbed46c483db6d4dff7814e2d3e4.diff
L
https://github.com/erichkeane closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140586
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
>From b83755d2aa0c5417ab8f359aa842449213437a7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qinkun Bao
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:14:01 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?U
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
I don't see anything of concern, lgtm!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow
-fsanitize-ignorelist=%t/src.ignorelist -emit-llvm %t/test2.c -o -
| FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK2
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -fsanitize=sig
@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow
-fsanitize-ignorelist=%t/src.ignorelist -emit-llvm %t/test2.c -o -
| FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK2
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -fsanitize=sig
vitalybuka wrote:
Note: Use to download my updates `spr patch 140529`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
Also I don't mind we fix multifile and sections in followup patches.
But this one needs at least documentation update.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140529
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
https://github.com/jeremyd2019 reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140169
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bob80905 approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139985
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jeremyd2019 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140169
>From 47f81a804a36a5b685f130f22d2ab5d330170861 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kikairoya
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:30:13 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Cygwin][MinGW] Internal class in
explicitly-instantiation-
https://github.com/bcardosolopes approved this pull request.
LGTM after you address Andy's nits.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140425
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
https://github.com/AlexMaclean updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140615
>From babb28ef1c935f0d0cfb3b40f62be860be027010 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Maclean
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 18:12:11 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [NVPTX] Unify and extend barrier{.cta} intrinsic support
@@ -1349,6 +1349,10 @@ static bool upgradeIntrinsicFunction1(Function *F,
Function *&NewFn,
else if (Name == "clz.ll" || Name == "popc.ll" || Name == "h2f" ||
Name == "swap.lo.hi.b64")
Expand = true;
+ else if (Name == "barrier0" || Name == "b
@@ -240,6 +240,34 @@ def BF16RT : RegTyInfo;
def F16X2RT : RegTyInfo;
def BF16X2RT : RegTyInfo;
+// This class provides a basic wrapper around an NVPTXInst that abstracts the
+// specific syntax of most PTX instructions. It automatically handles the
+// construction of the
@@ -170,6 +170,8 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY NVPTXTargetInfo : public
TargetInfo {
Opts["cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics"] = true;
Opts["cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics"] = true;
Opts["cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics"] = true;
+
+Opts["__opencl_c_
@@ -6,13 +7,15 @@
; Use bar.sync to arrive at a pre-computed barrier number and
; wait for all threads in CTA to also arrive:
define ptx_device void @test_barrier_named_cta() {
-; CHECK: mov.b32 %r[[REG0:[0-9]+]], 0;
-; CHECK: bar.sync %r[[REG0]];
-; CHECK: mov.b32 %r[[REG1:[
https://github.com/jeremyd2019 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140169
>From 47f81a804a36a5b685f130f22d2ab5d330170861 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kikairoya
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:30:13 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Cygwin][MinGW] Internal class in
explicitly-instantiation-
401 - 500 of 587 matches
Mail list logo
