vitalybuka wrote: > > The linked pull request (#140529) introduces a new feature rather than > > correcting a bug. > > I would argue that since the `src:*=sanitize` syntax could reasonably be > expected to work, but it did not work, then that is both a missing feature > and a bug (not working as intended). > > If it had been a new syntax that no user would expect to work (`newfoo:*`, or > `=newblah`) then that would be a missing feature but not a bug.
Yep, feature or bug, but the current behavior is not desirable. It's nice when test shows a difference in behavior, not just the final result. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140602 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
