cor3ntin wrote:
> This needs a higher-level description of the overall goal, and why you've
> picked the specific instrumentation points you've chosen.
And tests! Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130103
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cf
u4f3 wrote:
Seems that the error in `/llvm-project/clang/test/Driver/offload-Xarch.c` is
not relevant. And I can't reproduce this error since I don't have a windows
machine...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130012
___
cfe-commits mailing l
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
Handle CXXUnresolvedConstructExpr in tryToFindPtrOrigin so that constructing
Ref, RefPtr, CheckedRef, CheckedPtr, ... constructed in such a way that its
type is unr
Author: zhaohui
Date: 2025-03-07T16:01:23+08:00
New Revision: 3a67c7c6f7f6d41adf4487d099c1225c31caf8c3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3a67c7c6f7f6d41adf4487d099c1225c31caf8c3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3a67c7c6f7f6d41adf4487d099c1225c31caf8c3.diff
LOG:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-spir-v
Author: Nick Sarnie (sarnex)
Changes
The SPIR-V backend is now a supported backend, and we believe it is ready to be
used by default in Clang over the SPIR-V translator.
Some IR generated by Clang today, such as those requiring SPIR-V t
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-nvptx-nvidia-ubuntu`
running on `as-builder-7` while building
`clang,flang,lldb,llvm,mlir,offload,polly` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/180/builds/
https://github.com/momo5502 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128866
>From bb4091d2f9b7062aa83e5bee2ba525478a7dbd0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maurice Heumann
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:31:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Instantiate destructors from initialized anonymous union
Carlos =?utf-8?q?Gálvez?= ,
Carlos =?utf-8?q?Gálvez?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
carlosgalvezp wrote:
> This does not sound controversial or hard.
It is already controversial for clang-tidy, surely it will be even more
controversial if we involve many other tools?
Besides, this request involv
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2025-03-07T11:10:28-05:00
New Revision: 494bf26736f49db3a1932ef6067b2fc1737d78be
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/494bf26736f49db3a1932ef6067b2fc1737d78be
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/494bf26736f49db3a1932ef6067b2fc1737d78be.diff
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130299
>From 8ee44f1f2beb659a37c693b4f323491f6bfd8caa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 11:04:31 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [C2y] Implement WG14 N3409
This paper removes UB around use
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Aaron Ballman (AaronBallman)
Changes
This paper removes UB around use of void expressions. Previously, code like
this had undefined behavior:
```
void foo(void) {
(void)(void)1;
extern void x;
x;
}
```
and this is now well-
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 5685def507ed7c95bf93572e5cf8c30efbc7d99b
8f49378e77a8b248f34d689996835629c279d7c6 --e
https://github.com/Meinersbur edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130285
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130299
This paper removes UB around use of void expressions. Previously, code like
this had undefined behavior:
```
void foo(void) {
(void)(void)1;
extern void x;
x;
}
```
and this is now well-defi
jhuber6 wrote:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130285 I'll see if this makes CI
happy, thanks so much for your diagnosis.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130248
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/13202
Here is th
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: 2025-03-07T11:15:20+08:00
New Revision: 55f86cf02336e0a1bce81403296cce6d4cfbb1e4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/55f86cf02336e0a1bce81403296cce6d4cfbb1e4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/55f86cf02336e0a1bce81403296cce6d4cfbb1e4.diff
LO
@@ -12796,6 +12799,7 @@ namespace {
}
void VisitCXXOperatorCallExpr(CXXOperatorCallExpr *E) {
+ llvm::SaveAndRestore CxxOpCallScope(isInCXXOperatorCall, true);
shafik wrote:
We should be using
[bugprone-argument-comment](https://clang.llvm.org/e
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130371
Follow up to c6b9d5ce76a155b682b1562122f43166aaa6391d in another instance.
This is still failing in unrelated PR prechecks, but passing its own check.
>From 41ecac5701fec0f0a358f4503f469f2562b31210 Mon Sep 17 00:
https://github.com/shafik edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129198
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -12609,6 +12611,7 @@ namespace {
isPODType = false;
isRecordType = false;
isReferenceType = false;
+ isInCXXOperatorCall = false;
shafik wrote:
It feels like changing this to use in class member initializers would have been
a big win
aheejin wrote:
@llvm-ci The CI failure does not look relevant.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rniwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128679
>From b4001f95cf6d35f59ef8af6df8f2bdbe043da380 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:47:45 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [alpha.webkit.webkit.RetainPtrCtorAdoptChecker] Add a new
WebK
https://github.com/rniwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128679
>From b4001f95cf6d35f59ef8af6df8f2bdbe043da380 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:47:45 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [alpha.webkit.webkit.RetainPtrCtorAdoptChecker] Add a new
WebK
https://github.com/owenca requested changes to this pull request.
Why should we add those macros to the default list? Can't you use the
[`AttributeMacros`](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html#attributemacros)
option instead?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/13034
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2025-03-07T13:55:39-06:00
New Revision: fefb6858da42053268b53c07aff8e1cf84dc1ada
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fefb6858da42053268b53c07aff8e1cf84dc1ada
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fefb6858da42053268b53c07aff8e1cf84dc1ada.diff
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130339
Fixes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127336#pullrequestreview-2665950553
>From bed2cb009ae2e560aa00f86b90c57d82f97bb435 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 22:10:24 +
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Oleksandr T. (a-tarasyuk)
Changes
Fixes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127336#pullrequestreview-2665950553
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130339.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/Sema/s
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
Someone better equipped to review cmake should review this, but looks ok to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130322
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
https://github.com/lei137 commented:
Thank-you for the fix John!
It would be good if your patch can show the changes that is being introduced
via this patch. In prep for that I have put up a
[PR](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130324) to add the existing
checks for this test. Can
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130164
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hekota edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128991
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -22,56 +22,144 @@
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s \
// RUN: -DFNATTRS
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
@@ -22,56 +22,144 @@
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s \
// RUN: -DFNATTRS
dwblaikie wrote:
I wouldn't mind a few more details here on the motivation.
> This new symbol will allow a debugger to easily associate classes with the
> physical location of their VTables using only the DWARF information.
What sort of features are you picturing building with this?
The DWAR
https://github.com/kmpeng updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130320
>From bdb66b5a68090e304647ddbbeb403ac408fcea65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kmpeng
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:50:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] start implementation
---
clang/lib/Headers/hlsl/hlsl_detail.h | 14
https://github.com/spall updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129773
>From 6c2e22d2fa59f34401156ac6fd85c44730bf8c45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sarah Spall
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 12:58:13 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] make semantics case insensitive. update tests. add new
tests
--
JonPsson1 wrote:
> To clarify, the code is calling `__extendhfdf2` then `__truncdfhf2` from
> either libgcc or from compiler-rt with your patches, and the compiler-rt
> version is incorrect? Could you have it print the intermediate results as u16
> hex (`Op0 + Op1`, `Res2`, `Res`)?
Yes, my te
https://github.com/lei137 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130324
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Chris B
Date: 2025-03-07T17:28:41-06:00
New Revision: 0ea52234fc3510463df2d8718404cede874e9b5e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ea52234fc3510463df2d8718404cede874e9b5e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ea52234fc3510463df2d8718404cede874e9b5e.diff
LOG:
Author: Lei Huang
Date: 2025-03-07T18:27:35-05:00
New Revision: 23a44b925a7599301c5ae92e03dc7e1067385961
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/23a44b925a7599301c5ae92e03dc7e1067385961
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/23a44b925a7599301c5ae92e03dc7e1067385961.diff
LOG
dwblaikie wrote:
> > Mostly I worry it won't be terribly complete, because it can't work through
> > situations, like this:
> > ```
> > template
> > struct trait {
> > using type = T;
> > };
> > template
> > struct other {
> > trait::type v1;
> > T v2;
> > };
> > ```
> > In this case, v2
https://github.com/llvm-beanz closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130173
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 1b75b9e665ee3c43de85c25f8d5f10d4efb3ca39
870c0ea0c6dde2232ad63ec51f968007702cef90 --e
Carlos =?utf-8?q?Gálvez?= ,
Carlos =?utf-8?q?Gálvez?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
HerrCai0907 wrote:
I prefer to start from this patch. Because it is already here without
additional effort.
Just like the incubator, when it has been tested by a certain number of users
and is stable enough, then
@@ -22,56 +22,144 @@
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s \
// RUN: -DFNATTRS
https://github.com/tbaederr edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130143
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Congcong Cai
Date: 2025-03-08T13:41:24+08:00
New Revision: 6f7570c200aa1ee9af9d1eb7a378d56264ee297e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f7570c200aa1ee9af9d1eb7a378d56264ee297e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f7570c200aa1ee9af9d1eb7a378d56264ee297e.diff
https://github.com/YutongZhuu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126846
>From 106a982e3c6bcfa3ee7c26133f0919791699f31a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yutong Zhu
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 18:16:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Fix signed-unsigned comparison with UO_Not and UO_Minus
---
@@ -154,3 +154,26 @@ int g() {
static_assert(f(arr) == 5);
}
}
+
+namespace GH128409 {
+ int &ff();
+ int &x = ff(); // nointerpreter-note {{declared here}}
+ constinit int &z = x; // expected-error {{variable does not have a constant
initializer}}
+
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130143
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
getRecord() returns null on array elements, even for composite arrays. The
assertion here was overly restrictive and having an array element as instance
pointer should be fine otherwise.
---
Full diff: http
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot6` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/164/builds/7889
Here is the releva
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-aarch64-sve2-vla-2stage` running on `linaro-g4-01` while building
`clang` at step 12 "ninja check 2".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/199/builds/2062
Here is the relevant piece
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130399
getRecord() returns null on array elements, even for composite arrays. The
assertion here was overly restrictive and having an array element as instance
pointer should be fine otherwise.
>From a4327462a417aeb
https://github.com/rniwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128679
>From b4001f95cf6d35f59ef8af6df8f2bdbe043da380 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:47:45 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [alpha.webkit.webkit.RetainPtrCtorAdoptChecker] Add a new
WebK
arichardson wrote:
> @arichardson as promised, I have rebased the changes. I'm not sure about the
> test failures, it would seem to me that they are unlikely to be caused by
> anything I did?
Yes it looks like an issue with the android CI setup, nothing related to this
patch I believe.
https
AaronBallman wrote:
I am comfortable landing the changes ahead of acceptance at WG21 plenary so
long as it's understood that if WG21 makes changes which break us, we'll
implement those changes. And based on that, I think setting the feature test
macro is fine.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pro
https://github.com/arichardson approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72040
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kmpeng created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130320
Replaced the current `fmod` definition with a templatized version, implemented
`fmod` algorithm for DirectX targets that matches the DXC implementation, added
corresponding tests in `clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/built
https://github.com/arichardson approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130286
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -10425,8 +10425,13 @@ def warn_type_safety_null_pointer_required : Warning<
"specified %0 type tag requires a null pointer">, InGroup;
// Generic selections.
-def err_assoc_type_incomplete : Error<
- "type %0 in generic association incomplete">;
+def ext_assoc_type_incom
@@ -22,56 +22,144 @@
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s \
// RUN: -DFNATTRS
https://github.com/joaosaffran commented:
nit: is there a way to check that the spelling is consistent in the error
messages? Asking since I am no familiar with this part of the code.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129773
___
cfe-commits ma
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+//===--- CaptureThisByFieldCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/jvoung created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130346
None
>From 10df1857532a6a27b0e5286e10c9f0724d6d7e1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Voung
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 21:02:16 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Add support for absl nullability macros
---
cla
https://github.com/t-rasmud approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130258
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor)
Changes
GCC, unlike clang, issues a warning when one virtual function is overridden in
a derived class but one or more other virtual functions with the same name and
different signature from a base class are not
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123667
>From 00b8b64879ad3ae35a0a671da563ac876ffaf228 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:51:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] use constant evaluation context for constexpr if
c
rniwa wrote:
Thanks for the review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130258
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: 2025-03-07T14:40:33-08:00
New Revision: c419acdf82d3b33cf151f78865469cf155ddf372
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c419acdf82d3b33cf151f78865469cf155ddf372
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c419acdf82d3b33cf151f78865469cf155ddf372.diff
arsenm wrote:
Replaced by #130285
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130248
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2025-03-07T15:15:53-05:00
New Revision: 0ea02e77218d8aee37bc1a7c776caeeff468dc39
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ea02e77218d8aee37bc1a7c776caeeff468dc39
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ea02e77218d8aee37bc1a7c776caeeff468dc39.diff
https://github.com/llvm-beanz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129396
>From 7620f9fac9932a13f1da0468b02c1aeceb212a0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bieneman
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 17:18:20 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [HLSL] select scalar overloads for vector conditions
Th
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/virginia-cangelosi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128854
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 6 "test-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/14201
Here is the relevant piec
@@ -892,6 +892,11 @@ namespace lambdas {
return a1.x;
});
A a2([&] { return a2.x; }); // ok
+A a3([=] { return a3.x; }()); // expected-warning{{variable 'a3' is
uninitialized when used within its own initialization}}
shafik wrote:
Do we now
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
Follow up to c6b9d5ce76a155b682b1562122f43166aaa6391d in another instance.
This is still failing in unrelated PR prechecks, but passing its own check.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
arsenm wrote:
* **#130371** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/130371?utm_source=stack-comment-icon";
target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite"
width="10px" height="10px"/> 👈 https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/13037
tgross35 wrote:
Nothing about the implementation stands out to me as wrong. It looks like the
exponent isn't correct, I guess you could step through this portion
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ae42f071032b29821beef6a337712580861c/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/fp_extend_impl.inc#L65-L6
https://github.com/alanzhao1 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130375
Additionally, remove the behavior for both pass manager's timer manager classes
(`PassTimingInfo` for the old pass manager and `TimePassesHandler` for the new
pass manager) where these classes would print the
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alan Zhao (alanzhao1)
Changes
Additionally, remove the behavior for both pass manager's timer manager classes
(`PassTimingInfo` for the old pass manager and `TimePassesHandler` for the new
pass manager) where these classes would print the
@@ -22,56 +22,136 @@
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
-// RUN: -DFNATTRS="spir_func noundef nofpclass(nan inf)" -DTY
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/13207
Here is th
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130297
>From 8ef214f6c78d710dbd9c74b06c7c637baf93e527 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 00:03:39 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] Add new check bugprone-capture-this-by-field
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple arm64-apple-ios -fsyntax-only -verify
-fptrauth-intrinsics -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-linux-gnu -fsyntax-only -verify
-fptrauth-intrinsics -std=c++11 %s
+
+template struct G {
+ T __ptrauth(0,0,1234) test;
+
https://github.com/Zhenhang1213 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130027
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Zhenhang1213 wrote:
> @Zhenhang1213 : Code looks ok. Are all edge cases covered by the lit test now?
>
> Could you please adjust the commit message to reflect the actual changes?
OK， I add more tests to cover, thx!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130027
__
https://github.com/Zhenhang1213 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130027
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Zhenhang1213 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130027
>From b7c6a38f913f5e83e9a72e0b81607de01a8a1b01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Austin
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 17:25:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [ARM] mtp = auto using hard point while arch supports thumb2
and h
Author: Matt Arsenault
Date: 2025-03-08T10:53:03+07:00
New Revision: 7602d781b03427052c44537fa4b9c2a6da15697c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7602d781b03427052c44537fa4b9c2a6da15697c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7602d781b03427052c44537fa4b9c2a6da15697c.diff
https://github.com/bcardosolopes approved this pull request.
LGTM, same observation as Erich regarding CMAKE stuff tho
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130322
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
https://github.com/arsenm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 475 matches
Mail list logo
