@@ -14585,11 +14585,18 @@ void Sema::CheckAddressOfPackedMember(Expr *rhs) {
_2, _3, _4));
}
+static ExprResult UsualUnaryConversionsNoPromoteInt(Sema &S, Expr *E) {
+ // Don't promote integer types
+ if (QualType Ty = E->getType();
S.getASTContext().is
@@ -1463,17 +1504,18 @@ void SanitizerArgs::addArgs(const ToolChain &TC, const
llvm::opt::ArgList &Args,
}
SanitizerMask parseArgValues(const Driver &D, const llvm::opt::Arg *A,
vitalybuka wrote:
Instead of extending this function, it would be cleaner to cre
Author: Farzon Lotfi
Date: 2025-01-06T19:57:30-05:00
New Revision: 90b04bf84ec3315f803a2ba846e3086ba5e3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/90b04bf84ec3315f803a2ba846e3086ba5e3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/90b04bf84ec3315f803a2ba846e3086ba5e3.diff
https://github.com/farzonl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/llvm-beanz approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116331
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1297,27 +1297,16 @@ float4 lerp(float4, float4, float4);
///
/// Length is based on the following formula: sqrt(x[0]^2 + x[1]^2 + ...).
-_HLSL_16BIT_AVAILABILITY(shadermodel, 6.2)
-_HLSL_BUILTIN_ALIAS(__builtin_hlsl_length)
-half length(half);
-_HLSL_16BIT_AVAILABILITY(sha
@@ -1854,6 +1855,9 @@ bool Sema::CheckConstexprFunctionDefinition(const
FunctionDecl *NewFD,
}
}
+ if (Context.getTargetInfo().getTriple().isAArch64())
+ARM().CheckSMEFunctionDefAttributes(NewFD);
+
cor3ntin wrote:
This seems like a weird place to
ilovepi wrote:
We're seeing SYCL tests fail on Linux builders after this patch
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/fuchsia/builders/toolchain.ci/clang-host-linux-x64/b8726474372098645345/overview
```
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stderr):
--
RUN: at line 1: /b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm_build/bin/clang -### -fsy
@@ -1,73 +1,151 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
-// RUN: dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
-// RUN: --check-prefixes=CHECK,NATIVE_HALF
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -
alexey-bataev wrote:
Please update OpenMPSupport.rst
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121746
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/leijurv updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118046
>From 1caf823165b16f6701993d586df51d5cdbf0885e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leijurv
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 21:54:36 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-format] Add BreakBeforeTemplateClose option
---
clang/doc
https://github.com/perry-ca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82
>From 360bab981d8ec36e17aa4fbadbb4feef42c5d135 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Perry
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:09:32 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add z/OS customization file
---
clang/include/clang/Driver/Dr
pow2clk wrote:
Will this go in with no description?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121611
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,32 +1,53 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
dxil-pc-shadermodel6.6-library %s -fnative-half-type -disable-llvm-passes
-verify -verify-ignore-unexpected
-
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
dxil-pc-shadermodel6.6-library %s -fnative-h
alexey-bataev wrote:
Update OpenMPSupport.rst
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121741
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+//===- HLSLRootSignature.h - HLSL Root Signature helper objects
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/arichardson requested changes to this pull request.
Code needs formatting and missing tests.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121800
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mail
https://github.com/hanickadot updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98756
From 7d65b133b5f04e078b3b26cee2b4be0fe78d01e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Hana=20Dusi=CC=81kova=CC=81?=
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 21:06:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] implement P3309 atomic builtin
@@ -3615,9 +3616,12 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitCheck(
if (!CGM.getCodeGenOpts().SanitizeMergeHandlers.has(Checked[i].second))
NoMerge = true;
+
+if (!CGM.getCodeGenOpts().NoSanitizeTopHot.has(Checked[i].second))
+ SanitizeGuardChecks = true;
}
- if (
@@ -3602,6 +3602,7 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitCheck(
llvm::Value *RecoverableCond = nullptr;
llvm::Value *TrapCond = nullptr;
bool NoMerge = false;
+ bool SanitizeGuardChecks = ClSanitizeGuardChecks;
vitalybuka wrote:
Usually we parse Cls as `if (ClSa
@@ -3615,9 +3616,12 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitCheck(
vitalybuka wrote:
maybe we can keep the patch Driver only, because we need:
passing fractions array into LLVM passes: ubsan and hwasan
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121619
___
@@ -0,0 +1,563 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --function-signature
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -target-feature
+fullbf16 -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK
---
https://github.com/jcranmer-intel commented:
I haven't fully reviewed this, but here's some comments to start with:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78503
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
@@ -470,8 +470,16 @@ static void InitializeStandardPredefinedMacros(const
TargetInfo &TI,
if (LangOpts.CPlusPlus26)
// FIXME: Use correct value for C++26.
Builder.defineMacro("__cplusplus", "202400L");
-else if (LangOpts.CPlusPlus23)
+else if (LangOpts.
@@ -132,6 +133,70 @@ template <> struct
llvm::DenseMapInfo {
return LHS == RHS;
}
};
+constexpr unsigned CXX23FloatRankToIndex(clang::BuiltinType::Kind Kind) {
+ switch (Kind) {
+ case clang::BuiltinType::Float16:
+return 0;
+ case clang::BuiltinType::BFloat16:
+
@@ -132,6 +133,70 @@ template <> struct
llvm::DenseMapInfo {
return LHS == RHS;
}
};
+constexpr unsigned CXX23FloatRankToIndex(clang::BuiltinType::Kind Kind) {
+ switch (Kind) {
+ case clang::BuiltinType::Float16:
+return 0;
+ case clang::BuiltinType::BFloat16:
+
https://github.com/jcranmer-intel edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78503
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7670,27 +7739,68 @@ static FloatingRank getFloatingRank(QualType T) {
}
}
+/// C++23 6.8.5 [conv.rank]
/// getFloatingTypeOrder - Compare the rank of the two specified floating
/// point types, ignoring the domain of the type (i.e. 'double' ==
-/// '_Complex double').
carlosgalvezp wrote:
Sorry for the late review, but isn't this already covered by `-Wall` with GCC?
At least the example from the check documentation:
https://godbolt.org/z/es37ozqe9
```
warning: 'sprintf' argument 3 overlaps destination object 'buf'
```
If this check is not redundant given t
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121852
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/macurtis-amd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121663
>From 4500df21b2085dfb84228d399126eb65281297da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthew Curtis
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 13:38:57 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [llvm][NFC] Rework Timer.cpp globals to ensure valid
l
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121852
After #116331 is always SpellingNotCalculated,
so I assume doing nothing is expected.
>From d5cedbc7b822671f5ac45e1f4d49ed91c13858e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 14:48:15
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)
Changes
After #116331 is always SpellingNotCalculated,
so I assume doing nothing is expected.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121852.diff
1 Files Affec
inbelic wrote:
I didn't implement the tokenizer because I found that the extra level of
abstraction to be redundant/not beneficial with the StringRef operations.
Looking at the DXC implementation, the usage of the Tokenizer is either
GetAndMatchToken, or, getToken for an identifier with a swi
https://github.com/joaosaffran approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thanks for fixing this
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121852
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -38,63 +38,40 @@
using namespace llvm;
-// This ugly hack is brought to you courtesy of constructor/destructor ordering
-// being unspecified by C++. Basically the problem is that a Statistic object
-// gets destroyed, which ends up calling 'GetLibSupportInfoOutputFile()'
@@ -284,18 +250,22 @@ NamedRegionTimer::NamedRegionTimer(StringRef Name,
StringRef Description,
/// ctor/dtor and is protected by the TimerLock lock.
static TimerGroup *TimerGroupList = nullptr;
-TimerGroup::TimerGroup(StringRef Name, StringRef Description)
- : Name(Name.beg
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2025-01-06T14:50:57-08:00
New Revision: 1a435feffcd85c1e7fe30daf1a3995e95860b300
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1a435feffcd85c1e7fe30daf1a3995e95860b300
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1a435feffcd85c1e7fe30daf1a3995e95860b300.diff
L
macurtis-amd wrote:
> Thanks for working on this.
>
> I have a couple of questions about inconsistent casing. Other than that, this
> looks reasonable to me. But I don't have a great deal of experience with this
> part of LLVM, so please wait for other reviewers.
@tarunprabhu Thanks for takin
@@ -8010,15 +8010,19 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const
JobAction &JA,
}
}
- if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_forder_file_instrumentation)) {
- CmdArgs.push_back("-forder-file-instrumentation");
- // Enable order file instrumentation when ThinLTO is
@@ -1531,7 +1531,7 @@ Compilation *Driver::BuildCompilation(ArrayRef ArgList) {
// Check if the environment version is valid except wasm case.
llvm::Triple Triple = TC.getTriple();
- if (!Triple.isWasm()) {
+ if (!Triple.isWasm() && Triple.getEnvironment() != llvm::Tripl
@@ -941,6 +941,19 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
return Counter::getCounter(CounterMap[S]);
}
+ std::pair getBranchCounterPair(const Stmt *S,
+ Counter ParentCnt) {
+Counter ExecCnt = getRegionCounter(S);
+
DeinAlptraum wrote:
@efriedma-quic no idea, I would just rebase and hope that's it
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -938,6 +938,37 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
return Counter::getCounter(CounterMap[S]);
}
+ struct BranchCounterPair {
ornata wrote:
A doxygen comment here might be useful.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112702
@@ -938,6 +938,37 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
return Counter::getCounter(CounterMap[S]);
}
+ struct BranchCounterPair {
+Counter Executed;
ornata wrote:
Comments on member variables?
E.g.
```
/// Counter tracking number of times the b
@@ -938,6 +938,37 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
return Counter::getCounter(CounterMap[S]);
}
+ struct BranchCounterPair {
ornata wrote:
IIUC the point of this pair is given:
```
if (x) {
// ... do something
} else if (y) {
// ... somethin
MaskRay wrote:
NAK. While llvm libc can be used an overlay, it is not complete for standalone
Linux server/desktop usage. Introducing a target triple has large ecosystem
implication and should not be taken lightly.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121123
_
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121123
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -938,6 +938,37 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
return Counter::getCounter(CounterMap[S]);
}
+ struct BranchCounterPair {
+Counter Executed;
+Counter Skipped;
+ };
+
+ BranchCounterPair getBranchCounterPair(const Stmt *S, Counter ParentCnt) {
+Co
@@ -938,6 +938,37 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
return Counter::getCounter(CounterMap[S]);
}
+ struct BranchCounterPair {
+Counter Executed;
+Counter Skipped;
+ };
+
+ BranchCounterPair getBranchCounterPair(const Stmt *S, Counter ParentCnt) {
---
RossComputerGuy wrote:
Why close? LLVM libc is maturing and one of the goals I had was to try using it
in Nixpkgs to build whatever I can. LLVM libc doesn't work well in an overlay
mode so we have to use full builds. It's true that a lot of functions are still
missing or not implemented but by
@@ -1592,6 +1605,13 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
llvm::EnableSingleByteCoverage
? getRegionCounter(S->getCond())
: addCounters(ParentCount, BackedgeCount, BC.ContinueCount);
+auto [ExecCount, ExitCount] =
+(llvm::EnableSing
jhuber6 wrote:
You can compile and run static C applications, I'm not sure what the threshold
is before we can start adding support to make it usable in `clang`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121123
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
The second paragraph can mention `_Unwind_Resume` explicitly.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121819
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin
ccotter wrote:
Oh, you are entirely right. I completely missed that gcc had this check. All of
my test cases are covered by gcc's check, and gcc's check is a bit smarter than
mine (`sprintf(stp->buf, "%s", st1.buf)` is caught by gcc, but not my check).
Is this still worth adding here? I didn't
carlocab wrote:
> Introducing a target triple has large ecosystem implication and should not be
> taken lightly.
To be fair this patch doesn't introduce a target triple, it only makes it more
easily usable in Clang.
That said, I tend to agree with the review at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-
@@ -174,6 +174,26 @@ static_assert(!__is_layout_compatible(StructWithAnonUnion,
StructWithAnonUnion3)
#endif
} // namespace cwg2759
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+namespace cwg2770 { // cwg2770: 20
zyn0217 wrote:
Yes, I implemented what that issue proposed.
I
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -77,16 +80,32 @@ void
Z3CrosscheckVisitor::finalizeVisitor(BugReporterContext &BRC,
RefutationSolver->addConstraint(SMTConstraints);
}
- // And check for satisfiability
- llvm::TimeRecord Start = llvm::TimeRecord::getCurrentTime(/*Start=*/true);
- std::optional Is
https://github.com/NagyDonat commented:
I'm really grateful that you implemented my request about defining this option
as a positive value; especially considering that it ended up being more work
than what I expected. (I guessed that we must already had precedent(s) for
positive (or at least o
https://github.com/ccotter edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114244
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ccotter wrote:
Ok, all comments should be addressed. The check now uses
`areStatementsIdentical` to more generically find buggy patterns (thanks for
that suggestion!).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114244
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-
https://github.com/ccotter updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114244
>From fd914cc82688b122654d2d7ada72007541b197c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Cotter
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 10:54:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/21] Add bugprone-sprintf-overlap
---
.../bugprone/BugproneTid
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks for the updates!
If the updated test passes, feel free to merge it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -174,6 +174,26 @@ static_assert(!__is_layout_compatible(StructWithAnonUnion,
StructWithAnonUnion3)
#endif
} // namespace cwg2759
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+namespace cwg2770 { // cwg2770: 20
Endilll wrote:
> Yes, I implemented what that issue proposed.
https://github.com/steakhal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239
>From f7041f5f6f0127f335bedf081f648e769007a827 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Balazs Benics
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:35:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [analyzer] Retry UNDEF Z3 queries at most
"crosscheck-with
@@ -213,6 +215,15 @@ ANALYZER_OPTION(
"400'000 should on average make Z3 queries run for up to 100ms on modern "
"hardware. Set 0 for unlimited.", 0)
+ANALYZER_OPTION(
+unsigned, Z3CrosscheckRetriesOnTimeout,
+"crosscheck-with-z3-retries-on-timeout",
+"Set
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
steakhal wrote:
> LGTM, thanks for the updates!
>
> If the updated test passes, feel free to merge it.
The uploaded tests never run in the CI due to the `REQUIRES: Z3`. I double
checked locally and everything passes.
Thanks for the review.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239
___
https://github.com/yxsamliu approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116820
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Alejandro =?utf-8?q?Álvarez_Ayllón?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1235,15 +1235,24 @@ bool Sema::AttachTypeConstraint(AutoTypeLoc TL,
<< NewConstrainedParm->getTypeSourceInfo()
->getTypeLoc()
.getSourceRange();
+NewConstrainedParm->setP
@@ -77,16 +80,32 @@ void
Z3CrosscheckVisitor::finalizeVisitor(BugReporterContext &BRC,
RefutationSolver->addConstraint(SMTConstraints);
}
- // And check for satisfiability
- llvm::TimeRecord Start = llvm::TimeRecord::getCurrentTime(/*Start=*/true);
- std::optional Is
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239
>From f7041f5f6f0127f335bedf081f648e769007a827 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Balazs Benics
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:35:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [analyzer] Retry UNDEF Z3 queries at most
"crosscheck-with
https://github.com/necto created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121781
Replace the family of `SymbolManager::get*Symbol(...)` member functions with a
single generic `SymbolManager::get<*>` member function.
>From 08b838adf275f1e0eaf2ab3e3d4b2b6d89bf4ed6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
@@ -20440,6 +20442,26 @@ Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitAMDGPUBuiltinExpr(unsigned
BuiltinID,
}
}
+Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitSPIRVBuiltinExpr(unsigned BuiltinID,
+ const CallExpr *E) {
+ switch (BuiltinID) {
+ case SPIRV::BI__bui
=?utf-8?q?Kristóf?= Umann
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1389,6 +1389,68 @@ Query for this attribute with
``__has_attribute(overloadable)``.
}];
}
+def OwnershipDocs : Documentation {
+ let Heading = "ownership_holds, ownership_returns, ownership_takes (Clang "
+
=?utf-8?q?Kristóf?= Umann
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
steakhal wrote:
You have a build error:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/12634515572/job/35202412861#step:10:773
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121759
___
cfe-commits mai
https://github.com/frasercrmck updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119423
>From 3f007d702922db63e128e3c0f72dff2f600e0879 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fraser Cormack
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:41:07 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang] Fix sub-integer
__builtin_elementwise_(add|sub
necto wrote:
@NagyDonat Here is the refactoring you suggested in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121551
I made sure `check-clang-analysis` passes after each commit, so I think
reviewing it by commit should be easier than all at once.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121781
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 9ce8f4b70b31b031ac9b4818a268bfc8c67a7a8e
824649120ac51ac75ad22a7276f7380f801e6db6 --e
=?utf-8?q?Kristóf?= Umann
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1389,6 +1389,68 @@ Query for this attribute with
``__has_attribute(overloadable)``.
}];
}
+def OwnershipDocs : Documentation {
+ let Heading = "ownership_holds, ownership_returns, ownership_takes (Clang "
+
frasercrmck wrote:
> Would be good to also update the documentation for the builtins the clarify
> the behavior.
I've added some words to that effect. Is that what you had in mind?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119423
___
cfe-commits mail
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121783
Fixed: #121731
According to https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.scope.scope#5, name independent
declaration should not be warned as unused
>From b8cd88ce9174476da90cbf1a2407976b99114a9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Congcong Cai (HerrCai0907)
Changes
Fixed: #121731
According to https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.scope.scope#5, name
independent declaration should not be warned as unused
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121783.
https://github.com/MacDue updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121763
>From 2cadacae4359f8d67bdff850738441fba455a8bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benjamin Maxwell
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:49:48 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Lower non-builtin sincos[f|l] calls to
llvm.sincos
=?utf-8?q?Kristóf?= Umann ,
=?utf-8?q?Kristóf?= Umann ,
=?utf-8?q?Kristóf?= Umann
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1407,8 +1407,17 @@ These attributes are used by the Clang Static Analyzer's
dynamic memory modeling
facilities to mark custom allocating/deallocating functions.
A
=?utf-8?q?Kristóf?= Umann ,
=?utf-8?q?Kristóf?= Umann ,
=?utf-8?q?Kristóf?= Umann
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121759
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
htt
=?utf-8?q?Krist=C3=B3f?= Umann ,
=?utf-8?q?Krist=C3=B3f?= Umann ,
=?utf-8?q?Krist=C3=B3f?= Umann
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
Looks truly awesome
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121759
__
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-aarch64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot7` while building `clang,llvm` at step 2
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/8566
Here is the relevant piece o
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r
7cb6e6bced8ca5767c3e609f4826982638fd9543...67ba481f809abdc85a90fed5ff11ca48c6578e3e
llvm/
Author: Balazs Benics
Date: 2025-01-06T18:08:12+01:00
New Revision: 55391f85acc7e7a14ea2ef3c1a4bd8f3df990426
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/55391f85acc7e7a14ea2ef3c1a4bd8f3df990426
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/55391f85acc7e7a14ea2ef3c1a4bd8f3df990426.diff
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=aarch64-gnu-linux -emit-llvm -O1 %s -o - |
FileCheck --check-prefix=NO-MATH-ERRNO %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=aarch64-gnu-linux -emit-llvm -fmath-errno %s -o - |
FileCheck --check-prefix=MATH-ERRNO %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=aa
https://github.com/jthackray approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121801
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Kristóf?= Umann ,
=?utf-8?q?Kristóf?= Umann ,
=?utf-8?q?Kristóf?= Umann
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
steakhal wrote:
Could you please check the generated html prior merging this, just to be on the
safe side it looks as intended.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121759
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Momchil Velikov (momchil-velikov)
Changes
The `arm_neon.h` does a lot of vector-to-vector "conversions" using
the C cast operator in some cases or a round trip through memory in
some other cases.
The latt
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: Momchil Velikov (momchil-velikov)
Changes
The `arm_neon.h` does a lot of vector-to-vector "conversions" using
the C cast operator in some cases or a round trip through memory in
some other cases.
The latter is especially troublin
https://github.com/inbelic created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121803
```
- Implement the ParseRootParameter methods in ParseHLSLRootSignature
- Define the in-memory represenation of the various RootParameters and adds
it to the RootElement structure
- Add testing of valid inputs t
201 - 300 of 572 matches
Mail list logo
