================
@@ -174,6 +174,26 @@ static_assert(!__is_layout_compatible(StructWithAnonUnion,
StructWithAnonUnion3)
#endif
} // namespace cwg2759
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+namespace cwg2770 { // cwg2770: 20
----------------
Endilll wrote:
> Yes, I implemented what that issue proposed.
Good to know! I fixed it with NFC commits myself, no worries.
> I saw the script removing the entire cwg2770 line after I added this test.
What happened is that script has printed `Issue 2770 is marked '', which
differs from CWG index status 'open'`, and stopped right there, before emitting
HTML for CWG2770. I guess in order to clear the confusion, I should update the
script to not write anything to file until it's sure everything is good.
> Could you instruct me on what to do with it? Should we leave out the test
> until the issue gets resolved?
No, the script is able to handle tests for not yet resolved issues. That's how
you do it:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/1229b78f1676d56d0d386a5c4cde8f98a78d0989/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg27xx.cpp#L177
I also moved CWG2369 test from the end of `cwg23xx.cpp` right before CWG2370
test, because that's how DR tests are ordered.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102857
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
