@@ -579,8 +579,14 @@ ProgramStateRef
CStringChecker::CheckLocation(CheckerContext &C,
// These checks are either enabled by the CString out-of-bounds checker
// explicitly or implicitly by the Malloc checker.
// In the latter case we only do modeling but do not emi
@@ -702,9 +702,17 @@ ProgramStateRef
CStringChecker::CheckOverlap(CheckerContext &C,
state->assume(svalBuilder.evalEQ(state, *firstLoc, *secondLoc));
if (stateTrue && !stateFalse) {
-// If the values are known to be equal, that's automatically an overlap.
-emi
@@ -768,9 +776,17 @@ ProgramStateRef
CStringChecker::CheckOverlap(CheckerContext &C,
std::tie(stateTrue, stateFalse) = state->assume(*OverlapTest);
if (stateTrue && !stateFalse) {
-// Overlap!
-emitOverlapBug(C, stateTrue, First.Expression, Second.Expression);
-
@@ -838,8 +860,15 @@ void
CStringChecker::emitUninitializedReadBug(CheckerContext &C,
void CStringChecker::emitOutOfBoundsBug(CheckerContext &C,
ProgramStateRef State, const Stmt *S,
StringRef Warn
@@ -614,10 +620,6 @@ CStringChecker::CheckBufferAccess(CheckerContext &C,
ProgramStateRef State,
if (!State)
return nullptr;
- // If out-of-bounds checking is turned off, skip the rest.
- if (!Filter.CheckCStringOutOfBounds)
-return State;
-
isuck
@@ -768,9 +776,17 @@ ProgramStateRef
CStringChecker::CheckOverlap(CheckerContext &C,
std::tie(stateTrue, stateFalse) = state->assume(*OverlapTest);
if (stateTrue && !stateFalse) {
-// Overlap!
-emitOverlapBug(C, stateTrue, First.Expression, Second.Expression);
-
https://github.com/isuckatcs edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113312
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113268
>From 0d1c2446a225d73e014e711b0d74931bff9237bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 23:27:35 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-format] Add KeepFormFeed option
Closes #113170.
---
clang
yonghong-song wrote:
> > In the above, you will do unsigned load extension. But what about signed
> > extension load variant?
>
> @yonghong-song, if we ever need that, we can add a new flag to bit `0-3` of
> `imm` to indicate "this 8- or 16-bit load-acquire is sign-extending", just
> like `BPF
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-m68k-linux-cross`
running on `suse-gary-m68k-cross` while building
`clang,flang,libclc,llvm,offload` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/27/builds/913
Her
yonghong-song wrote:
> If our plan is to:
>
> * generate `zext` BPF 8- and 16-bit load-acquire for
> `atomic_load_zext_{8,16}`
>
> * (if needed) generate `sext` BPF 8- and 16-bit load-acquire for
> `atomic_load_sext_{8,16}`
>
>
> Then this problem needs to be solved, and I can inclu
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113133
>From 4cb7472aaa8973651a85057ee2f7ca7415d8ea72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:18:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Clang: emit llvm.minnum and llvm.maxnum with nsz always
See:
owenca wrote:
> wow I've never seen this used, but this looks fine to me.
Form feeds can be useful for emas/vim users and are recommended by the GNU
Coding Standards.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113268
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-c
@@ -582,7 +582,46 @@ TEST(APFloatTest, MinNum) {
APFloat zp(0.0);
APFloat zn(-0.0);
EXPECT_EQ(-0.0, minnum(zp, zn).convertToDouble());
- EXPECT_EQ(-0.0, minnum(zn, zp).convertToDouble());
+
+ APInt intPayload_89ab(64, 0x89ab);
wzssyqa wrote:
It is not
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112854
>From ad7c6b648f3bb88ce075fa15cf8915350e4981ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:33:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] APFloat: Fix maxnum and minnum with sNaN
See: https://github.
Bo98 wrote:
Ping?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Bo98 wrote:
Ping?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111397
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ on support follow.
``Smcdeleg`` Supported
``Smcsrind`` Supported
``Smepmp``Supported
+ ``Smrnmi``Supported
dong-miao wrote:
Okay, thanks for your help.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: Alexandros Lamprineas (labrinea)
Changes
Currently we maintain a hand written list of subtarget features which we are
implied for a given FMV feature. It is more robust to expand such dependencies
using ExtensionDependency from
https://github.com/labrinea converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1216,10 +1308,225 @@ void DeclareImplicitDeductionGuidesForTypeAlias(
->getDeductionCandidateKind() == DeductionCandidate::Aggregate)
continue;
-BuildDeductionGuideForTypeAlias(SemaRef, AliasTemplate, F, Loc);
+BuildDeductionGuideForTypeAlias(Sema
https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98788
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hokein approved this pull request.
Thanks! It looks good from my side. Please address the comments from the other
reviewers and wait a bit before landing, in case they have additional feedback.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98788
__
https://github.com/labrinea edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-10-22T12:16:07+03:00
New Revision: 6bb72de75a81e27b2768db767350bcf4ce7d2a2c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6bb72de75a81e27b2768db767350bcf4ce7d2a2c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6bb72de75a81e27b2768db767350bcf4ce7d2a2c.
@@ -2272,18 +2273,14 @@ incomingCalls(const CallHierarchyItem &Item, const
SymbolIndex *Index) {
// Initially store the ranges in a map keyed by SymbolID of the caller.
// This allows us to group different calls with the same caller
// into the same CallHierarchyIncoming
@@ -2292,9 +2289,26 @@ incomingCalls(const CallHierarchyItem &Item, const
SymbolIndex *Index) {
Index->lookup(ContainerLookup, [&](const Symbol &Caller) {
auto It = CallsIn.find(Caller.ID);
assert(It != CallsIn.end());
-if (auto CHI = symbolToCallHierarchyItem(Ca
https://github.com/DavidSpickett updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113290
>From df728276026481b7397d2008541bfaed572774a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:34:17 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [ci] Write test results to unique file names
In this
@@ -2580,6 +2580,8 @@ void NeonEmitter::runVectorTypes(raw_ostream &OS) {
OS << "typedef __fp16 float16_t;\n";
OS << "#if defined(__aarch64__) || defined(__arm64ec__)\n";
+ OS << "typedef __MFloat8x8_t mfloat8x8_t;\n";
+ OS << "typedef __MFloat8x16_t mfloat8x16_t;\n";
--
nasherm wrote:
@CarolineConcatto I hope I answered your question. If so I'm hoping to merge
this by EOD if there's no more to do
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112341
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
@@ -2580,6 +2580,8 @@ void NeonEmitter::runVectorTypes(raw_ostream &OS) {
OS << "typedef __fp16 float16_t;\n";
OS << "#if defined(__aarch64__) || defined(__arm64ec__)\n";
+ OS << "typedef __MFloat8x8_t mfloat8x8_t;\n";
+ OS << "typedef __MFloat8x16_t mfloat8x16_t;\n";
--
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112612
>From 6112d12f757cce0214132e9201dc2a434e40e0c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 23:42:05 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] prevent assertion failure in value-dependent
initi
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112424
>From a22c6bae4f42f42e67f8e0c2b1f914e50d140099 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 22:43:24 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] prevent setting default lexical access specifier
f
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/10830
Here is the r
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x86_64-debian-fast`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/56/builds/10434
Here is the rel
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-global-isel`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-global-isel` while building `clang` at step 7
"ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/125/builds/2959
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage` running on `ppc64le-clang-multistage-test`
while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/76/builds/3857
Here is the
https://github.com/jvoung updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112605
>From 57a913c8870b338fa127f323be65fda972d65a96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Voung
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 19:38:45 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][dataflow] Cache accessors for
bugprone-unchecked-optiona
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-win-x-aarch64`
running on `as-builder-2` while building `clang` at step 10 "test-check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/193/builds/2439
Here is the relevant piece of
@@ -269,6 +271,40 @@ void Sema::inferLifetimeBoundAttribute(FunctionDecl *FD) {
}
}
+static bool IsPointerLikeType(QualType QT) {
+ QT = QT.getNonReferenceType();
+ // if (QT->isPointerType())
hokein wrote:
any reason to comment it out? I think having thi
@@ -269,6 +271,40 @@ void Sema::inferLifetimeBoundAttribute(FunctionDecl *FD) {
}
}
+static bool IsPointerLikeType(QualType QT) {
hokein wrote:
we have a similar function in the CheckExprLifetime.cpp, we can move it to
`Sema.h` to make it reusable.
https:
@@ -269,6 +271,40 @@ void Sema::inferLifetimeBoundAttribute(FunctionDecl *FD) {
}
}
+static bool IsPointerLikeType(QualType QT) {
+ QT = QT.getNonReferenceType();
+ // if (QT->isPointerType())
+ // return true;
+ auto *RD = QT->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
+ if (!RD)
+re
@@ -1882,6 +1882,46 @@ def LifetimeBound : DeclOrTypeAttr {
let SimpleHandler = 1;
}
+def LifetimeCaptureBy : DeclOrTypeAttr {
+ let Spellings = [Clang<"lifetime_capture_by", 0>];
+ let Subjects = SubjectList<[ParmVar, ImplicitObjectParameter], ErrorDiag>;
+ let Args = [V
@@ -18,29 +18,42 @@
namespace clang::sema {
-/// Describes an entity that is being assigned.
-struct AssignedEntity {
- // The left-hand side expression of the assignment.
- Expr *LHS = nullptr;
+struct CapturingEntity {
hokein wrote:
+1.
I'd not change
Author: Congcong Cai
Date: 2024-10-22T17:03:51+08:00
New Revision: c0c36aa0189de217d7a312829ba40e838090294d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c0c36aa0189de217d7a312829ba40e838090294d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c0c36aa0189de217d7a312829ba40e838090294d.diff
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113186
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 11 "Add check check-libc-amdgcn-amd-amdhsa".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/7389
@@ -1909,6 +1911,12 @@ void TypePrinter::printAttributedAfter(const
AttributedType *T,
OS << " [[clang::lifetimebound]]";
return;
}
+ if (T->getAttrKind() == attr::LifetimeCaptureBy) {
+// FIXME: Print the attribute arguments once we have a way to retrieve
thes
@@ -248,9 +256,12 @@ static void
visitLocalsRetainedByReferenceBinding(IndirectLocalPath &Path,
LocalVisitor Visit);
template static bool isRecordWithAttr(QualType Type) {
- if (auto *RD = Type->getAsCXXRecordDecl())
-re
@@ -1909,6 +1911,12 @@ void TypePrinter::printAttributedAfter(const
AttributedType *T,
OS << " [[clang::lifetimebound]]";
return;
}
+ if (T->getAttrKind() == attr::LifetimeCaptureBy) {
+// FIXME: Print the attribute arguments once we have a way to retrieve
thes
@@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ def ShiftOpParentheses: DiagGroup<"shift-op-parentheses">;
def OverloadedShiftOpParentheses: DiagGroup<"overloaded-shift-op-parentheses">;
def DanglingAssignment: DiagGroup<"dangling-assignment">;
def DanglingAssignmentGsl : DiagGroup<"dangling-assignment-gs
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
This is more similar to the diagnostic output of the current interpreter
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113276.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cp
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113276
This is more similar to the diagnostic output of the current interpreter
>From 73e6cd0e877f635f071e0fbbccc4c087e638a549 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:54
Author: Rajveer Singh Bharadwaj
Date: 2024-10-22T10:31:20+02:00
New Revision: 73057349a292df72b944380db6fe6dfffd59c7fa
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/73057349a292df72b944380db6fe6dfffd59c7fa
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/73057349a292df72b944380db6fe6dfffd59
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96301
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/labrinea created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113281
Currently we maintain a hand written list of subtarget features which we are
implied for a given FMV feature. It is more robust to expand such dependencies
using ExtensionDependency from TargetParser, since th
@@ -1107,8 +1172,32 @@ BuildDeductionGuideForTypeAlias(Sema &SemaRef,
Sema::CodeSynthesisContext::BuildingDeductionGuides)) {
auto *GG = cast(FPrime);
-Expr *IsDeducible = buildIsDeducibleConstraint(
-SemaRef, AliasTemplate, FPrime->getReturnType(), F
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2024-10-22T16:51:43+08:00
New Revision: d15559d69d519cae203508b1ffe3adbdd29ab387
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d15559d69d519cae203508b1ffe3adbdd29ab387
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d15559d69d519cae203508b1ffe3adbdd29ab387.diff
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112896
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building `clang` at step 4
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/6970
Here is the relevant p
hokein wrote:
Forgot to push the new change of the test file after addressing the comment.
The buildbot failures should be fixed after
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/56f75b5c1510cea7648cad0cb32e4e0810edd0d9.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113180
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/12506
Here is
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-ppc64le-linux-test-suite` running on `ppc64le-clang-test-suite` while
building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/95/builds/529
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-3` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/23/builds/4066
Here is the r
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`ppc64le-lld-multistage-test` running on `ppc64le-lld-multistage-test` while
building `clang` at step 7 "test-build-stage1-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/168/bu
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-solaris11-sparcv9`
running on `solaris11-sparcv9` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/13/builds/3063
Here is the relevant piece of t
@@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ class DiagnosticOptions : public
RefCountedBase{
/// The file to serialize diagnostics to (non-appending).
std::string DiagnosticSerializationFile;
+ /// File that defines suppression mappings.
kadircet wrote:
I was dropping that mos
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113202
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-10-22T10:38:13+02:00
New Revision: 9ae41c24b37f5ce22c5b5a2f3bc0680aaf174f35
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9ae41c24b37f5ce22c5b5a2f3bc0680aaf174f35
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9ae41c24b37f5ce22c5b5a2f3bc0680aaf174f35.diff
L
https://github.com/labrinea updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113281
>From 2b416dd0071d45be3f92671f0cb238091689a9dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexandros Lamprineas
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:15:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [FMV][AArch64] Expand feature dependencies using
A
https://github.com/usx95 approved this pull request.
Thanks. LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113180
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112081
>From 67c41612085489a2a17eec49f98dbfa0e5bb97cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:27:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] fix range calculation for conditionals with throw
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112612
>From 6112d12f757cce0214132e9201dc2a434e40e0c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 23:42:05 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] prevent assertion failure in value-dependent
initi
Author: Emilia Kond
Date: 2024-10-22T13:36:28+03:00
New Revision: aea60ab94db4729bad17daa86ccfc411d48a1699
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aea60ab94db4729bad17daa86ccfc411d48a1699
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aea60ab94db4729bad17daa86ccfc411d48a1699.diff
L
https://github.com/rymiel closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110942
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113294
This fixes layering violation introduced in
2fd01d75a863184766ee0c82b5c0fc8be172448a. The declaration is moved to
`SemaTemplateInstantiate` section of `Sema.h`, after the file where it's
implemented.
>From a3
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
This fixes layering violation introduced in
2fd01d75a863184766ee0c82b5c0fc8be172448a. The declaration is moved to
`SemaTemplateInstantiate` section of `Sema.h`, after the file where it's
implemented.
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-hip-vega20` running
on `hip-vega20-0` while building `clang` at step 3 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/123/builds/7933
Here is the relevant piece of the build log for
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2024-10-22T14:22:06+02:00
New Revision: a6d6c00fe7515763650b28ef56f1fc4b5c568c1c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a6d6c00fe7515763650b28ef56f1fc4b5c568c1c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a6d6c00fe7515763650b28ef56f1fc4b5c568c1c.diff
LO
https://github.com/hokein closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113180
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct __aliasing_iterator_wrapper {
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _Alias operator*() const _NOEXCEPT {
_Alias __val;
- __builtin_memcpy(&__val, std::__to_address(__base_), sizeof(value_type));
+ __builtin_memcpy(&__val, static_cast(std::__to_ad
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/9885
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `clang` at step 6 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/9252
Here is t
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ve-ninja` running on
`hpce-ve-main` while building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/12/builds/8123
Here is the relevant piece of the build log for th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-m68k-linux-cross`
running on `suse-gary-m68k-cross` while building `clang` at step 4 "build stage
1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/27/builds/873
Here is the relevant piece of
philnik777 wrote:
Sorry, I don't feel qualified to approve this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113020
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-linux` running on `avx512-intel64` while building
`clang` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/133/builds/5542
Here is the relevant pie
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv8-quick` running
on `linaro-clang-armv8-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/6279
Here is the relevant piece of
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `arc-builder` running on
`arc-worker` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/3/builds/6519
Here is the relevant piece of
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-gcc-ubuntu` running on `sie-linux-worker3` while building
`clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/7189
Here
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/8053
Here is the
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct __aliasing_iterator_wrapper {
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _Alias operator*() const _NOEXCEPT {
_Alias __val;
- __builtin_memcpy(&__val, std::__to_address(__base_), sizeof(value_type));
+ __builtin_memcpy(&__val, static_cast(std::__to_ad
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/6514
Here is the relevant piec
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/7399
Here is the rele
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2024-10-22T14:39:36+02:00
New Revision: 56f75b5c1510cea7648cad0cb32e4e0810edd0d9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/56f75b5c1510cea7648cad0cb32e4e0810edd0d9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/56f75b5c1510cea7648cad0cb32e4e0810edd0d9.diff
LO
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-debian-cpp20`
running on `clang-debian-cpp20` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/108/builds/5064
Here is the r
@@ -68,19 +68,13 @@ struct ExtensionInfo {
#include "llvm/TargetParser/AArch64TargetParserDef.inc"
struct FMVInfo {
- StringRef Name; // The target_version/target_clones spelling.
- CPUFeatures Bit;// Index of the bit in the FMV feature bitset.
- StringRef Features;
playstation-edd wrote:
Note to self: fix typo in comment on submission ("The~se~ implementation ...").
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113162
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
@@ -4961,7 +4961,6 @@ void Sema::InstantiateFunctionDefinition(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
bool AtEndOfTU) {
if (Function->isInvalidDecl() || isa(Function))
return;
-
hokein wrote:
nit: unintended change
https://github.com/dong-miao updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111668
>From c7a9b55023bc1910e1d2e0383dfab0314f525213 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dong-miao <65881865+dong-m...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 18:49:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/23] Update RISCVSyst
301 - 400 of 488 matches
Mail list logo
