Stylie777 wrote:
It might be worth splitting each feature into its own commit rather than one
big commit, it makes the review easier. Currently it's difficult to determine
which section belongs to which feature.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112341
_
https://github.com/Stylie777 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112341
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Stylie777 reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112341
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jthackray wrote:
> It might be worth splitting each feature into its own commit rather than one
> big commit, it makes the review easier. Currently it's difficult to determine
> which section belongs to which feature.
Hmm, yeah possible.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112341
__
https://github.com/Stylie777 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112171
>From a702473aacc6a9c47eb80b204ee3200c2ff2eb26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jack Styles
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 14:20:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [PAuthLR] Add support for FEAT_PAuth_LR to libunwind
This in
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Owen Pan (owenca)
Changes
Fixes #112487.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112494.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp (+5)
- (modified) clang/unittests/Format/Token
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112494
Fixes #112487.
>From f4e0c6554ed63bfb2a1fd17411090ac06038ebc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 01:07:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Handle template opener/closer in braced
mstorsjo wrote:
> I also bisected errors on Windows, down to this commit.
>
> The errors show up when running the compiler-rt testsuite, like this:
> https://github.com/mstorsjo/llvm-mingw/actions/runs/1135672/job/31598676534
> A number of tests fail, where `llvm-cov` errors out with `prof
@@ -5903,7 +5904,7 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitBuiltinExpr(const GlobalDecl
GD, unsigned BuiltinID,
auto Call = RValue::get(
EmitRuntimeCall(CGM.CreateRuntimeFunction(FTy, Name), Args));
if (TmpSize)
-EmitLifetimeEnd(TmpSize, TmpPtr);
+
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112341
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kateinoigakukun wrote:
Thank you for your detail report and sorry for your inconvenience. I opened a
PR to revert the root cause: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112520
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111332
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/Mick235711 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112521
A follow-up and alternative proposal to #112289.
In this PR, no new notes are added to avoid noise. Instead, originally, every
`[[nodiscard]]` trigger, regardless of whether it is on function declaration or
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Yihe Li (Mick235711)
Changes
A follow-up and alternative proposal to #112289.
In this PR, no new notes are added to avoid noise. Instead, originally, every
`[[nodiscard]]` trigger, regardless of whether it is on function declaration or
r
@@ -4020,6 +4079,33 @@ defm STNPD : StorePairNoAlloc<0b01, 1, FPR64Op, simm7s8,
"stnp">;
defm STNPQ : StorePairNoAlloc<0b10, 1, FPR128Op, simm7s16, "stnp">;
}
+// Armv9.6-a Load/store no-allocate pair (FEAT_LSUI)
+let Predicates = [HasLSUI] in {
+ defm LDTP: LoadPairOffs
Mick235711 wrote:
CC @Sirraide @erichkeane. (Sorry, I do not have permission to request
reviewers, so instead used ping)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112521
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cg
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112514
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,69 +1,67 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -emit-llvm
-cl-ext=+cl_khr_subgroups -O0 -cl-std=clc++ -o - %s | FileCheck %s
-// FIXME: Add MS ABI manglings of OpenCL things and remove %itanium_abi_triple
arsenm wrote:
It's 2 different paths t
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 15d85769f119061fbfcae6e9de43982b534ef724
01a538fbbd93a7f26e1309c9c95d5be0c8500402 --e
@@ -2568,12 +2580,59 @@ defm CASPA : CompareAndSwapPair<1, 0, "a">;
defm CASPL : CompareAndSwapPair<0, 1, "l">;
defm CASPAL : CompareAndSwapPair<1, 1, "al">;
+// v9.6-a atomic CAST
CarolineConcatto wrote:
I believe that these CAS and CASP have alias too
ht
mstorsjo wrote:
I also bisected errors on Windows, down to this commit.
The errors show up when running the compiler-rt testsuite, like this:
https://github.com/mstorsjo/llvm-mingw/actions/runs/1135672/job/31598676534
A number of tests fail, where `llvm-cov` errors out with `profile uses zl
glaubitz wrote:
Btw, if you submit a fix, it would be great if it could be backported to the 18
and 19 branches.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111995
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
https://github.com/zmodem updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112378
>From f44ba22a8e5232b3f1e4a680565acd5604a7016c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans Wennborg
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 17:18:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-cl]: Add /std:c++23preview and update _MSVC_LANG
for
zmodem wrote:
> LGTM! Can you also add a release note to clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst so users
> know about the new flag?
Sure, will do.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112378
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
https://github.com/zmodem closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112378
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Hans
Date: 2024-10-16T10:06:43+02:00
New Revision: 4ddea298e60c31d0995c06189a592895d2ad512b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4ddea298e60c31d0995c06189a592895d2ad512b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4ddea298e60c31d0995c06189a592895d2ad512b.diff
LOG: [cl
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111856
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-10-16T10:47:12+02:00
New Revision: 154929169ab460b6b135103208e7fecd3cfa58f0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/154929169ab460b6b135103208e7fecd3cfa58f0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/154929169ab460b6b135103208e7fecd3cfa58f0.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109981
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,32 +1,53 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 -fmodules %s -verify
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 -fmodules %s -verify -triple i686-windows
-// expected-no-diagnostics
-#pragma clang module build A
-module A {}
-#pragma clang module contents
-#pragma clang module begin A
+// RU
https://github.com/kasuga-fj created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112501
Previously `#pragma clang loop pipeline` only accepted `disable`. This patch
adds `enable` as a valid argument for this pragma. This allows Software
Pipelining optimization to be applied to some loops instead
https://github.com/bricknerb updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111856
>From 786d31e2657964e578cd1fdf2006b0fb3b19fab6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Boaz Brickner
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 15:15:23 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang] When checking for covariant return types, make
su
@@ -115,20 +115,20 @@ void usage() {
S('A'); // expected-warning {{ignoring temporary created by a constructor
declared with 'nodiscard' attribute: Don't let that S-Char go!}}
S(1);
S(2.2);
- Y(); // expected-warning {{ignoring temporary created by a constructor
declar
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -3767,28 +3764,26 @@ void
ExprEngine::evalEagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcation(ExplodedNodeSet &Dst,
continue;
}
-ProgramStateRef state = Pr
@@ -5903,7 +5904,7 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitBuiltinExpr(const GlobalDecl
GD, unsigned BuiltinID,
auto Call = RValue::get(
EmitRuntimeCall(CGM.CreateRuntimeFunction(FTy, Name), Args));
if (TmpSize)
-EmitLifetimeEnd(TmpSize, TmpPtr);
+
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -299,13 +299,12 @@ ANALYZER_OPTION(
ANALYZER_OPTION(
bool, ShouldEagerlyAssume, "eagerly-assume",
-"Whether we should eagerly assume evaluat
=?utf-8?q?Don=C3=A1t?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Don=C3=A1t?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Don=C3=A1t?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Don=C3=A1t?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
LGTM, modulo single inline unresolved comment thread.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pul
https://github.com/c8ef converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112459
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -833,8 +841,8 @@ def HasV9_5aOps : Architecture64<9, 5, "a", "v9.5a",
[HasV9_4aOps, FeatureCPA],
!listconcat(HasV9_4aOps.DefaultExts, [FeatureCPA, FeatureLUT,
FeatureFAMINMAX])>;
def HasV9_6aOps : Architecture64<9, 6, "a", "v9.6a",
- [HasV9_5aOps],
- !listconcat(HasV
https://github.com/c8ef updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112459
>From dfa1585af3f080987cbd15830c45c34bfecc1fca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: c8ef
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 01:18:13 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] implement constexpr builtin {l}abs
---
clang/include/clang/Basic/Builti
@@ -833,8 +841,8 @@ def HasV9_5aOps : Architecture64<9, 5, "a", "v9.5a",
[HasV9_4aOps, FeatureCPA],
!listconcat(HasV9_4aOps.DefaultExts, [FeatureCPA, FeatureLUT,
FeatureFAMINMAX])>;
def HasV9_6aOps : Architecture64<9, 6, "a", "v9.6a",
- [HasV9_5aOps],
- !listconcat(HasV
@@ -4660,6 +4746,21 @@ let Predicates = [HasLOR] in {
def STLLRH0 : InstAlias<"stllrh\t$Rt, [$Rn, #0]", (STLLRH GPR32: $Rt,
GPR64sp:$Rn)>;
}
+// v9.6-a Unprivileged load store operations
+let Predicates = [HasLSUI] in {
+defm LDTXRW : LoadUnprivilegedLSUI<0b10, GPR32, "l
tbaederr wrote:
Victory!
1) Iterate composite fields backwards for big-endian targets
2) Fix `BitcatBuffer::data()` pointing to the wrong byte if the number of
bytes in the buffer is not a multiple of `sizeof(uint64_t)` (which is what
`llvm::BitBuffer` uses internally) and we're on a big-end
tbaederr wrote:
Also, I've removed the logic for tracking uninitialized/indeterminate bits for
now since it can be added later.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112126
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
@@ -4660,6 +4746,21 @@ let Predicates = [HasLOR] in {
def STLLRH0 : InstAlias<"stllrh\t$Rt, [$Rn, #0]", (STLLRH GPR32: $Rt,
GPR64sp:$Rn)>;
}
+// v9.6-a Unprivileged load store operations
+let Predicates = [HasLSUI] in {
+defm LDTXRW : LoadUnprivilegedLSUI<0b10, GPR32, "l
@@ -4660,6 +4746,21 @@ let Predicates = [HasLOR] in {
def STLLRH0 : InstAlias<"stllrh\t$Rt, [$Rn, #0]", (STLLRH GPR32: $Rt,
GPR64sp:$Rn)>;
}
+// v9.6-a Unprivileged load store operations
+let Predicates = [HasLSUI] in {
+defm LDTXRW : LoadUnprivilegedLSUI<0b10, GPR32, "l
https://github.com/nikic updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80309
>From 96795194fc79359363bac0423516da2a06733047 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Popov
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:27:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] apint only
---
clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/IntegralAP.h |
@@ -3600,8 +3600,11 @@ ExprResult Sema::ActOnCharacterConstant(const Token
&Tok, Scope *UDLScope) {
ExprResult Sema::ActOnIntegerConstant(SourceLocation Loc, uint64_t Val) {
unsigned IntSize = Context.getTargetInfo().getIntWidth();
- return IntegerLiteral::Create(Context,
@@ -437,7 +437,9 @@ ExprResult Parser::createEmbedExpr() {
SourceLocation StartLoc = ConsumeAnnotationToken();
if (Data->BinaryData.size() == 1) {
Res = IntegerLiteral::Create(Context,
- llvm::APInt(CHAR_BIT,
Data->BinaryData.back()),
+
@@ -446,8 +474,10 @@ define amdgpu_kernel void @add_i32_uniform(ptr
addrspace(1) %out, ptr addrspace(
; GFX11W64-NEXT:; implicit-def: $vgpr1
; GFX11W64-NEXT:s_delay_alu instid0(VALU_DEP_1) | instskip(NEXT) |
instid1(VALU_DEP_1)
; GFX11W64-NEXT:v_mbcnt_hi_u32_b32 v
@@ -4660,6 +4746,21 @@ let Predicates = [HasLOR] in {
def STLLRH0 : InstAlias<"stllrh\t$Rt, [$Rn, #0]", (STLLRH GPR32: $Rt,
GPR64sp:$Rn)>;
}
+// v9.6-a Unprivileged load store operations
+let Predicates = [HasLSUI] in {
+defm LDTXRW : LoadUnprivilegedLSUI<0b10, GPR32, "l
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ struct UniqueVirtualMethod {
/// subobject in which that virtual function occurs).
class OverridingMethods {
using ValuesT = SmallVector;
- using MapType = llvm::MapVector;
+ using MapType = llvm::SmallMapVector;
nikic wrote:
It looks l
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ class ConstraintSystem {
/// A map of variables (IR values) to their corresponding index in the
/// constraint system.
- DenseMap Value2Index;
+ SmallDenseMap Value2Index;
nikic wrote:
I'd add a using/typedef for this one, especially a
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_mca_test_checks.py
+// RUN: llvm-mc -triple aarch64-none-linux-gnu -show-encoding -mattr=+occmo
-mattr=+mte < %s | FileCheck %s
jthackray wrote:
I think these tests should also check in
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_mca_test_checks.py
+// RUN: llvm-mc -triple aarch64 -show-encoding -mattr=+pcdphint %s | FileCheck
%s
jthackray wrote:
I think these tests should also check the instructions are rejecte
@@ -936,19 +978,20 @@ define amdgpu_kernel void @add_i32_varying_vdata(ptr
addrspace(1) %out, ptr addr
; GFX12W32-NEXT:s_cbranch_scc1 .LBB2_1
; GFX12W32-NEXT: ; %bb.2: ; %ComputeEnd
; GFX12W32-NEXT:v_mbcnt_lo_u32_b32 v1, exec_lo, 0
-; GFX12W32-NEXT:s_delay_alu ins
https://github.com/svenvh created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112514
Commit 84ee629bc515 ("clang: Remove some pointer bitcasts (#112324)",
2024-10-15) triggered some "Call parameter type does not match function
signature!" errors when using the OpenCL pipe builtin functions under
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Sven van Haastregt (svenvh)
Changes
Commit 84ee629bc515 ("clang: Remove some pointer bitcasts (#112324)",
2024-10-15) triggered some "Call parameter type does not match function
signature!" errors when u
https://github.com/c8ef updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112459
>From dfa1585af3f080987cbd15830c45c34bfecc1fca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: c8ef
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 01:18:13 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] implement constexpr builtin {l}abs
---
clang/include/clang/Basic/Builti
@@ -1,69 +1,67 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -emit-llvm
-cl-ext=+cl_khr_subgroups -O0 -cl-std=clc++ -o - %s | FileCheck %s
-// FIXME: Add MS ABI manglings of OpenCL things and remove %itanium_abi_triple
arsenm wrote:
Test both run lines?
ht
https://github.com/nikic updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80309
>From 96795194fc79359363bac0423516da2a06733047 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Popov
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:27:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] apint only
---
clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/IntegralAP.h |
alex-t wrote:
> > Although, revisiting this now, I still don't understand why they decided to
> > include ALL spill opcodes in the prologue, but not only the SGPR spills?
> > Clearly, none of the VGPR reloads really belong to the prologue.
> > At a first glance, changing the isSpill(opcode) to
@@ -1,69 +1,67 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -emit-llvm
-cl-ext=+cl_khr_subgroups -O0 -cl-std=clc++ -o - %s | FileCheck %s
-// FIXME: Add MS ABI manglings of OpenCL things and remove %itanium_abi_triple
svenvh wrote:
Surely I can add the old
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: Alexandros Lamprineas (labrinea)
Changes
If we split these features in the compiler (see relevant pull request
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109299), we would only be able to
hand-write a 'memtag2' version using inli
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alexandros Lamprineas (labrinea)
Changes
If we split these features in the compiler (see relevant pull request
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109299), we would only be able to
hand-write a 'memtag2' version using inline assembl
https://github.com/labrinea created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112511
If we split these features in the compiler (see relevant pull request
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109299), we would only be able to
hand-write a 'memtag2' version using inline assembly since the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-0` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/8330
Here is the relevan
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Discookie (Discookie)
Changes
Previously the name of anonymous enums in the check were `enum 'enum (unnamed
at /full/path/to/file.c:1:1)'`, which breaks reproducibility of clang-tidy
reports when the analyzed project is in a d
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Discookie (Discookie)
Changes
Previously the name of anonymous enums in the check were `enum 'enum (unnamed
at /full/path/to/file.c:1:1)'`, which breaks reproducibility of clang-tidy
reports when the analyzed project is in a differen
https://github.com/Discookie created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112496
Previously the name of anonymous enums in the check were `enum 'enum (unnamed
at /full/path/to/file.c:1:1)'`, which breaks reproducibility of clang-tidy
reports when the analyzed project is in a different fol
https://github.com/budimirarandjelovichtec updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105479
From 7d8b69eeb92c87d4aff4cbcd8c0f432d37c2b1e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: budimirarandjelovicsyrmia
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:20:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Catch missing format attribute
Author: Balázs Kéri
Date: 2024-10-16T10:17:34+02:00
New Revision: 9df8d8d05c2650b51bd4233e1759206d163f3133
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9df8d8d05c2650b51bd4233e1759206d163f3133
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9df8d8d05c2650b51bd4233e1759206d163f3133.diff
L
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112019
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,c_diagnostics
-Wmissing-format-attribute %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wmissing-format-attribute
-fdiagnostics-parseable-fixits %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -x c++ -verify=ex
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 4ddea298e60c31d0995c06189a592895d2ad512b
be0bee7948a8a6394ba93df619d76048847c1ca8 --e
@@ -1,32 +1,53 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 -fmodules %s -verify
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 -fmodules %s -verify -triple i686-windows
-// expected-no-diagnostics
-#pragma clang module build A
-module A {}
-#pragma clang module contents
-#pragma clang module begin A
+// RU
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1183,7 +1181,7 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
std::optional> CachedDarwinSDKInfo;
bool WarnedDarwinSDKInfoMissing = false;
- bool WarnedStackExhausted = false;
+ SingleWarningStackAwareExecutor StackAwareExecutor;
ilya-biryukov wrote:
Shoul
https://github.com/kasuga-fj edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112501
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
4JustMe4 wrote:
The suggestions have been applied. The document re-generation script has been
launched.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112190
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112126
>From 1cf8a3bd76adfd5595c000e2ad86fb1db5b96a8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:57:48 +0200
Subject: [PAT
@@ -5335,6 +5335,217 @@ static void handlePreferredTypeAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D,
const ParsedAttr &AL) {
D->addAttr(::new (S.Context) PreferredTypeAttr(S.Context, AL, ParmTSI));
}
+// This function is called only if function call is not inside template body.
+// TODO: Add call
@@ -1183,7 +1181,7 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
std::optional> CachedDarwinSDKInfo;
bool WarnedDarwinSDKInfoMissing = false;
- bool WarnedStackExhausted = false;
+ SingleWarningStackAwareExecutor StackAwareExecutor;
bricknerb wrote:
Yes, I co
https://github.com/karka228 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Karl-Johan Karlsson
Date: 2024-10-16T11:01:33+02:00
New Revision: 7c5d5c08181f399858d918d6910c021af4ec36c0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7c5d5c08181f399858d918d6910c021af4ec36c0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7c5d5c08181f399858d918d6910c021af4ec36c0
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
#include
+#include "clang/Basic/Diagnostic.h"
ilya-biryukov wrote:
This dependency seems unnecessary in this file, the other functions are
lower-level (don't depend on SourceLocations, etc).
There are a few files that depend on it for th
JonPsson1 wrote:
gentle ping... @efriedma-quic @nikic
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111740
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
NagyDonat wrote:
@steakhal May I merge this commit?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112209
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1183,7 +1181,7 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
std::optional> CachedDarwinSDKInfo;
bool WarnedDarwinSDKInfoMissing = false;
- bool WarnedStackExhausted = false;
+ SingleWarningStackAwareExecutor StackAwareExecutor;
ilya-biryukov wrote:
Makes
ilya-biryukov wrote:
Adding @ChuanqiXu9 to get another pair of eyes on it (for naming, code
structure, etc). I believe he was involved in reviewing some changes touching
`runWithSufficientStackSpace` I've previously sent.
Please give him a chance to review this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-p
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 commented:
Took a pretty quick scanning and this looks good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
@@ -1183,7 +1181,7 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
std::optional> CachedDarwinSDKInfo;
bool WarnedDarwinSDKInfoMissing = false;
- bool WarnedStackExhausted = false;
+ SingleWarningStackAwareExecutor StackAwareExecutor;
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Abstract
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112126
>From 1cf8a3bd76adfd5595c000e2ad86fb1db5b96a8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:57:48 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Start implementing __builtin_
https://github.com/tbaederr ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112126
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5335,6 +5335,217 @@ static void handlePreferredTypeAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D,
const ParsedAttr &AL) {
D->addAttr(::new (S.Context) PreferredTypeAttr(S.Context, AL, ParmTSI));
}
+// This function is called only if function call is not inside template body.
+// TODO: Add call
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109981
>From 8a987510829abcba7bdb3572db418f71f33bbd69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:45:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Implement constexpr __builtin_bit_cast
@@ -4769,6 +4843,109 @@ class LoadExclusivePair sz, bit o2, bit L, bit
o1, bit o0,
let PostEncoderMethod = "fixLoadStoreExclusive<0,1>";
}
+// Armv9.6-a load-store exclusive instructions
+let hasSideEffects = 1, mayLoad = 1, mayStore = 1 in
+class BaseLoadStoreExclusiveLSUI
https://github.com/budimirarandjelovichtec updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105479
From 3f46179ecdb0097313c0249c1f4ff0c33eb21772 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: budimirarandjelovicsyrmia
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:20:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Catch missing format attribute
https://github.com/lenary created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112561
This change implements support for the `cr` and `cf` register constraints
(which allocate a RVC GPR or RVC FPR respectively), and the `N` modifier (which
prints the raw encoding of a register rather than the nam
1 - 100 of 488 matches
Mail list logo
