https://github.com/sdkrystian created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111561
Currently, we do not account for differences in template depth when comparing
exception specifications for equivalence. This results in explicit
specializations of member function templates specialized for a
mizvekov wrote:
Yeah, I think its only user was reverted a while ago, but should be merged back
eventually.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111446
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1216,6 +1216,8 @@ static void handlePreferredName(Sema &S, Decl *D, const
ParsedAttr &AL) {
}
bool Sema::isValidPointerAttrType(QualType T, bool RefOkay) {
+ if (T->isDependentType())
erichkeane wrote:
Probably valuable to audit the other uses of this f
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111446
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111446
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-10-08T22:41:33+04:00
New Revision: eaea5f6f952b6059cebfe87ea9800a3a6516f9ed
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eaea5f6f952b6059cebfe87ea9800a3a6516f9ed
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eaea5f6f952b6059cebfe87ea9800a3a6516f9ed.
https://github.com/llvm-beanz edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110327
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CRC.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/DXILABI.h"
llvm-beanz wrote:
Do we need this include?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110327
___
https://github.com/5chmidti approved this pull request.
Please add a release note, otherwise LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111472
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
@@ -428,6 +431,7 @@ bool SPIRVInstructionSelector::spvSelect(Register ResVReg,
case TargetOpcode::G_INTRINSIC:
case TargetOpcode::G_INTRINSIC_W_SIDE_EFFECTS:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_INTRINSIC_CONVERGENT:
inbelic wrote:
Afaict, not within this section of t
https://github.com/jediry updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110634
>From 82160d1e6de3f197c847bf8ed21ea1fc314b3cf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryan Saunders
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 00:03:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Support BasedOnStyle: file:blah.clang-format
---
clang/inclu
@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
; This test aims to check ability to support "Arithmetic with Overflow"
intrinsics
; in the special case when those intrinsics are being generated by the
CodeGenPrepare;
-; pass during translations with optimization (note -O3 in llc arguments).
+; pass during
https://github.com/kyulee-com updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90933
>From 411fc459e58a65d9599c917f220ba68bb799baac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kyungwoo Lee
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:51:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [CGData][ThinLTO] Global Outlining with Two-CodeGen
Rounds
https://github.com/jediry updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110634
>From 82160d1e6de3f197c847bf8ed21ea1fc314b3cf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryan Saunders
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 00:03:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Support BasedOnStyle: file:blah.clang-format
---
clang/inclu
yonghong-song wrote:
For
About whether we should sign-extend for 8- and 16-bit load-acquires (brought up
by Yonghong):
All ARM64 insns that match acquiring_load seem to
zero-extend the value before writing it to register, like, LDAPRH:
Load-Acquire RCpc Register Halfword derives an a
jediry wrote:
> Can this have some unit test?
Done. Added docs as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote:
Is there a need for the changes? (Are you making a significant number of
changes in the file, or is this just a drive-by cleanup?) Generally, we don't
do sweeping formatting changes:
> Avoid committing formatting- or whitespace-only changes outside of code you
> plan to ma
Author: Louis Dionne
Date: 2024-10-08T13:16:47-04:00
New Revision: 7e31eaab575d15384654ed989717e5579e963e72
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7e31eaab575d15384654ed989717e5579e963e72
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7e31eaab575d15384654ed989717e5579e963e72.diff
https://github.com/ldionne closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111007
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111516
>From 94874b7acb9ce763f502b74bc50d983ee3012d53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:28:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Improve type traits recognition in
`__has_builtin`
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
>From 28e582bc3b3058aa5ba946c9eb9b3d0e989b5c28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:28:58 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Track function template instantiation from definition
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+//===--- Mustache.h -*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
These changes LGTM but precommit CI was unable to run, so it would be nice if
that could be re-run to ensure it comes back green before landing.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109024
___
cfe-commit
mizvekov wrote:
Now this is rebased on top of the `getTemplateInstantiationArgs` refactoring.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-c
honkstar1 wrote:
I'm working with Neil and I've just tried changing our system to work the way
where all our rsp etc use virtual paths and then create a vfsoverlay that
points to the "right" places... it almost works for portable pch.
What is not working is "#include_next".. that gets resolved
@@ -428,6 +431,7 @@ bool SPIRVInstructionSelector::spvSelect(Register ResVReg,
case TargetOpcode::G_INTRINSIC:
case TargetOpcode::G_INTRINSIC_W_SIDE_EFFECTS:
+ case TargetOpcode::G_INTRINSIC_CONVERGENT:
farzonl wrote:
Is there anything that distinguishes
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111010
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 requested changes to this pull request.
The documentation build workflow is not really the correct place to put this.
Also, why can't we just run the python script as part of building the docs
instead of committing the result of the script to the repository?
h
https://github.com/abhina-sree approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1119,6 +1125,18 @@
PassBuilder::buildModuleSimplificationPipeline(OptimizationLevel Level,
// removed.
MPM.addPass(
PGOIndirectCallPromotion(true /* IsInLTO */, true /* SamplePGO */));
+
+if (InstrumentSampleColdFuncPath.getNumOccurrences() &&
+
Author: Mike Crowe
Date: 2024-10-08T22:03:58+02:00
New Revision: a199fb1229987d0885a4367e3a439db336069156
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a199fb1229987d0885a4367e3a439db336069156
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a199fb1229987d0885a4367e3a439db336069156.diff
LO
5chmidti wrote:
Yep, thanks. Sorry for the delay
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97911
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/5chmidti closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97911
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
andykaylor wrote:
@rjmccall I understand your point, and I think you're raising a good question.
Let's walk through an example that illustrates why we currently want FMF on
phis and selects and see if we can agree on an alternative way to handle it. In
a comment on https://github.com/llvm/llvm
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111573
>From dea97ae4f893774489bfd423e9536e486f022bb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AmrDeveloper
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:12:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] assume_aligned incorrectly diagnoses a dependent
ret
@@ -3437,6 +3437,9 @@ static void encodeTypeForFunctionPointerAuth(const
ASTContext &Ctx,
OS << II->getLength() << II->getName();
return;
}
+ case Type::HLSLAttributedResource:
llvm-beanz wrote:
This should maybe be higher up with the "should never
@@ -3943,6 +3943,9 @@ void ItaniumRTTIBuilder::BuildVTablePointer(const Type
*Ty) {
// abi::__pointer_to_member_type_info.
VTableName = "_ZTVN10__cxxabiv129__pointer_to_member_type_infoE";
break;
+
+ case Type::HLSLAttributedResource:
+llvm_unreachable("not ye
@@ -4205,6 +4208,9 @@ llvm::Constant *ItaniumRTTIBuilder::BuildTypeInfo(
case Type::Atomic:
// No fields, at least for the moment.
break;
+
+ case Type::HLSLAttributedResource:
+llvm_unreachable("not yet implemented");
llvm-beanz wrote:
This too
https://github.com/llvm-beanz commented:
A few (mostly small) comments
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110327
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -13672,6 +13690,9 @@ static QualType getCommonNonSugarTypeNode(ASTContext
&Ctx, const Type *X,
TX->getDepth(), TX->getIndex(), TX->isParameterPack(),
getCommonDecl(TX->getDecl(), TY->getDecl()));
}
+ case Type::HLSLAttributedResource: {
l
@@ -29,19 +29,40 @@ class DirectXTargetCodeGenInfo : public TargetCodeGenInfo {
llvm::Type *DirectXTargetCodeGenInfo::getHLSLType(CodeGenModule &CGM,
const Type *Ty) const {
- auto *BuiltinTy = dyn_cast(Ty);
- if (!BuiltinTy
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80007
>From 447159a21d73d6b4b5c6f6c4710231f01e0af4fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:06:32 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [runtimes] Always define cxx_shared, cxx_static & other
targets
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ class CGHLSLRuntime {
GENERATE_HLSL_INTRINSIC_FUNCTION(SDot, sdot)
GENERATE_HLSL_INTRINSIC_FUNCTION(UDot, udot)
GENERATE_HLSL_INTRINSIC_FUNCTION(WaveIsFirstLane, wave_is_first_lane)
+ GENERATE_HLSL_INTRINSIC_FUNCTION(WaveReadLaneAt, waveReadLaneAt)
https://github.com/wlei-llvm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109837
>From 07a2cab3fa5df2965f9f7da9ee2d3603581a47f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wlei
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 20:23:20 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [InstrPGO] Instrument sampling profile based cold
function
---
c
@@ -1119,6 +1125,18 @@
PassBuilder::buildModuleSimplificationPipeline(OptimizationLevel Level,
// removed.
MPM.addPass(
PGOIndirectCallPromotion(true /* IsInLTO */, true /* SamplePGO */));
+
+if (InstrumentSampleColdFuncPath.getNumOccurrences() &&
+
https://github.com/inbelic updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111010
>From 70089645ec5cf62b491a56df96ec46f4328fbc11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Finn Plummer
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 11:43:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [HLSL] Implement `WaveReadLaneAt` intrinsic
- create a
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
dxil-pc-shadermodel6.6-library %s -fnative-half-type -emit-llvm-only
-disable-llvm-passes -verify -verify-ignore-unexpected
inbelic wrote:
Good catch. There are no ignored diagnostics and it
andykaylor wrote:
> Yeah, the conditional operator doesn't do any floating-path math itself. If
> the first operand is a floating-point expression, we should always be
> modeling that with a float-to-boolean conversion, and the flags should go
> there (if they're necessary — I didn't think com
luxufan wrote:
> https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html#vague-rtti and
> https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html#typeid in the ABI require
> the type name string to be globally unique, and some `std::type_info`
> implementations rely on that. You might be able to do this
@@ -1967,6 +1967,10 @@ def fclang_abi_compat_EQ : Joined<["-"],
"fclang-abi-compat=">, Group,
MetaVarName<"">, Values<".,latest">,
HelpText<"Attempt to match the ABI of Clang ">;
+def fno_demangling_failures: Flag<["-"], "fno-demangling-failures">,
Group,
wangpc-pp wrote:
> Why don’t any of our lit tests that use every intrinsic catch it?
We don't see any error, is it because your downstream added some intrinsics?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits
topperc wrote:
Why don’t any of our lit tests that use every intrinsic catch it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -462,6 +462,9 @@ ENUM_CODEGENOPT(ZeroCallUsedRegs,
llvm::ZeroCallUsedRegs::ZeroCallUsedRegsKind,
/// non-deleting destructors. (No effect on Microsoft ABI.)
CODEGENOPT(CtorDtorReturnThis, 1, 0)
+/// Whether to validate if a produced mangled name can be demangled with LLVM
https://github.com/VitaNuo edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111391
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ void RISCVIntrinsicManagerImpl::InitRVVIntrinsic(
Record.HasFRMRoundModeOp);
// Put into IntrinsicList.
- uint16_t Index = IntrinsicList.size();
+ uint32_t Index = IntrinsicList.size();
topperc wrote
https://github.com/topperc edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kongy wrote:
There is a case that becomes invalid with this patch, is it expected behaviour?
```
template struct Traits {
using Type = Traits;
};
template
void bar(typename Traits::Type... args) {
FillVRegs(args...);
}
template void FillVRegs(typename Traits::Type...);
template
void Fill
https://github.com/Sirraide approved this pull request.
Looks like CI is still mad at you for some reason so that still needs to be
looked into, but other than that this lgtm.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110239
___
cfe-commits mailing li
topperc wrote:
Does the number intrinsics vary with the number of extensions enabled? Maybe we
don't have a test with all extensions?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
https://github.com/Sirraide approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111224
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Sirraide closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111224
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Doug Wyatt
Date: 2024-10-08T10:20:05+02:00
New Revision: 4d218caa7716743061e8d34d61b2181c94b16440
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d218caa7716743061e8d34d61b2181c94b16440
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d218caa7716743061e8d34d61b2181c94b16440.diff
LO
VitaNuo wrote:
> Since this is being done as an assert, this is something that really only
> applies during debug mode. I dont think this compiler flag makes sense
> because of it.
The reason I am adding a flag on top of an assert is that there are
unfortunately still many mangled names produ
Sirraide wrote:
@dougsonos Maybe you should ask for commit access since you’ll likely be
contributing more patches to this in the future as I understand it?
CC @AaronBallman Does that still work like it used to or did your maintainers
rfc change something about that too?
https://github.com/ll
Sirraide wrote:
Oh, also, are there any other places where we should maybe be using
`FunctionEffectsRef::get()`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111224
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
Author: Piyou Chen
Date: 2024-10-08T16:26:55+08:00
New Revision: f658c1bf4a9d74518ff55a37184b76ec5dec9a8b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f658c1bf4a9d74518ff55a37184b76ec5dec9a8b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f658c1bf4a9d74518ff55a37184b76ec5dec9a8b.diff
LO
https://github.com/BeMg closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111333
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usx95 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111499
This implements the RFC
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-introduce-clang-lifetime-capture-by-x/81371
>From b1368f676ac5f55741df021c2697d3b46fd2c92d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Tue, 8 Oct
https://github.com/Sirraide updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110446
>From a61f3e94d0636f4294f3be440d79b83889771800 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 02:58:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Instantiate the correct lambda call operator
---
clang
https://github.com/ostannard updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109943
>From 9b2646806978429395232ed596429ef281bcb26b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Stannard
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 12:58:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [ARM] Re-generate a test
---
llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/fp
@@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=armv7a-none-eabi %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+declare i32 @many_args_callee(i32 %0, i32 %1, i32 %2, i32 %3, i32 %4, i32 %5)
+
+define i32 @many
@@ -26588,10 +26613,7 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, Cpp20ModulesSupport) {
" int foo;\n"
"};",
Style);
- verifyFormat("export {\n"
- " int foo;\n"
- "};",
- Style);
+ verifyFormat("export { int f
ilya-biryukov wrote:
Sorry for jumping in late.
I think Erich is on point that having a flag that controls an assertion is a
bit of a red flag as we are mixing build configuration and runtime
configuration.
It is at least unusual and may cause confusion.
After thinking about this a bit more,
@@ -2292,9 +2289,26 @@ incomingCalls(const CallHierarchyItem &Item, const
SymbolIndex *Index) {
Index->lookup(ContainerLookup, [&](const Symbol &Caller) {
auto It = CallsIn.find(Caller.ID);
assert(It != CallsIn.end());
-if (auto CHI = symbolToCallHierarchyItem(Ca
@@ -2292,9 +2289,26 @@ incomingCalls(const CallHierarchyItem &Item, const
SymbolIndex *Index) {
Index->lookup(ContainerLookup, [&](const Symbol &Caller) {
auto It = CallsIn.find(Caller.ID);
assert(It != CallsIn.end());
-if (auto CHI = symbolToCallHierarchyItem(Ca
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111488
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1462,6 +1462,8 @@ template void
Writer::finalizeAddressDependentContent() {
for (;;) {
bool changed = ctx.target->needsThunks
? tc.createThunks(pass, ctx.outputSections)
+ : ctx.arg.emachine == EM_LOONGARCH && !ctx.arg.relax
@@ -134,6 +134,13 @@ void loongarch::getLoongArchTargetFeatures(const Driver &D,
(!Args.hasArgNoClaim(clang::driver::options::OPT_march_EQ)))
Features.push_back("+lsx");
+ // -mrelax is default, unless -mno-relax is specified.
MaskRay wrote:
This
https://github.com/MaskRay commented:
We split clang and lld changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111488
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67520
>From 55efd18bb177150a1fd170cb1535e225854967a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 07:39:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Warn on RequiresCapability attribute mismatch
-
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -2249,7 +2249,7 @@ void fooF1(Foo *f) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(f->mu_) {
f
@@ -3437,6 +3437,9 @@ static void encodeTypeForFunctionPointerAuth(const
ASTContext &Ctx,
OS << II->getLength() << II->getName();
return;
}
+ case Type::HLSLAttributedResource:
hekota wrote:
The other "should never get here"' is in a different swit
@@ -13672,6 +13690,9 @@ static QualType getCommonNonSugarTypeNode(ASTContext
&Ctx, const Type *X,
TX->getDepth(), TX->getIndex(), TX->isParameterPack(),
getCommonDecl(TX->getDecl(), TY->getDecl()));
}
+ case Type::HLSLAttributedResource: {
h
https://github.com/haoNoQ created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111624
This is an attempt to finally land the documentation that I initially wrote in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136811 - which doubled as RFC - and I sincerely
apologize for not doing this sooner.
I've rewritten most
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Artem Dergachev (haoNoQ)
Changes
This is an attempt to finally land the documentation that I initially wrote in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136811 - which doubled as RFC - and I sincerely
apologize for not doing this sooner.
I've rewritten
https://github.com/tstellar created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111625
This adds a build of the libLLVMSupport to the lit suite that is used for
generating profile data. This helps to improve both PGO and BOLT optimization
of clang over the existing hello world training program.
@@ -1513,6 +1522,171 @@ class InProcessThinBackend : public ThinBackendProc {
return Error::success();
}
};
+
+/// This backend is utilized in the first round of a two-codegen round process.
+/// It first saves optimized bitcode files to disk before the codegen process
+/
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+; This test verifies whether we can outline a singleton instance (i.e., an
instance that does not repeat)
teresajohnson wrote:
This test seems like mostly an overlap of the caching test, with the exception
of the regular LTO module interaction
@@ -1513,6 +1522,171 @@ class InProcessThinBackend : public ThinBackendProc {
return Error::success();
}
};
+
+/// This backend is utilized in the first round of a two-codegen round process.
+/// It first saves optimized bitcode files to disk before the codegen process
+/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Tom Stellard (tstellar)
Changes
This adds a build of the libLLVMSupport to the lit suite that is used for
generating profile data. This helps to improve both PGO and BOLT optimization
of clang over the existing hello world training progr
https://github.com/hekota approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111439
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,35 +1,66 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
-// RUN: dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s \
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple
dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s \
// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s
https://github.com/pow2clk commented:
Just a few comments to explain the changes that aren't just mangling style
changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111632
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
@@ -1,93 +1,96 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=hlsl2021 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \
-// RUN: dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s -fnative-half-type \
-// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \
-// RUN: --check-prefixes=CHECK,NATIVE_HALF
-// RUN:
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -std=hlsl202x
-emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes %s -o - | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes=CS,NOINLINE,CHECK
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library -std=hlsl202x
-emit-llvm -disable-llvm-p
@@ -56,14 +55,12 @@ void main() {
// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}}DoSilly
// CHECK-NEXT:entry:
-// CHECK-NEXT: [[ResPtr:%.*]] = alloca ptr
// CHECK-NEXT: [[ThisPtrAddr:%.*]] = alloca ptr
-// CHECK-NEXT: store ptr [[AggRes:%.*]], ptr [[ResPtr]]
// CHECK-NEXT: store ptr {{.*}
@@ -289,17 +289,19 @@ void setFour(inout int I) {
// CHECK: [[B:%.*]] = alloca %struct.B
// CHECK: [[Tmp:%.*]] = alloca i32
-// CHECK: [[BFLoad:%.*]] = load i32, ptr [[B]]
-// CHECK: [[BFshl:%.*]] = shl i32 [[BFLoad]], 24
-// CHECK: [[BFashr:%.*]] = ashr i32 [[BFshl]], 24
-//
@@ -13,16 +13,16 @@ void InitBuf(RWBuffer buf) {
}
// CHECK-NOT: _Init_thread_epoch
-// CHECK: define internal void @"?main@@YAXXZ"
+// CHECK: define internal void @_Z4mainv
// CHECK-NEXT: entry:
// CHECK-NEXT: [[Tmp1:%.*]] = alloca %"class.hlsl::RWBuffer"
-// CHECK-NEXT: [[
https://github.com/pow2clk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111632
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 486 matches
Mail list logo
