Author: Michael Buch
Date: 2024-10-02T19:38:51+01:00
New Revision: 52a9ba7ca4fb9427706c28bb3ca15f7a56eecf3f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/52a9ba7ca4fb9427706c28bb3ca15f7a56eecf3f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/52a9ba7ca4fb9427706c28bb3ca15f7a56eecf3f.diff
https://github.com/keith-packard updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108942
>From 1ca3c96bc0e07a2fdae982736017f1d31147e4e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Keith Packard
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:41:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] riscv: Support -mstack-protector-guard=tls
Add suppor
yxsamliu wrote:
One drawback of not defining `__AMDGCN_WAVEFRONT_SIZE__` in host compilation is
the impairment of uniformity of source code across host and device sides. Users
have to put `#if __HIP_DEVICE_COMPILE__` anywhere they use
`__AMDGCN_WAVEFRONT_SIZE__`. Previous experience tells us t
@@ -1784,6 +1784,12 @@ defm debug_info_for_profiling :
BoolFOption<"debug-info-for-profiling",
PosFlag,
NegFlag>;
+def fprofile_generate_cold_function_coverage : Flag<["-"],
"fprofile-generate-cold-function-coverage">,
mtrofin wrote:
Why would incompatib
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-10-02T12:21:23-07:00
New Revision: 87a24136140496e30aa867074bdee1be1f3b3294
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/87a24136140496e30aa867074bdee1be1f3b3294
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/87a24136140496e30aa867074bdee1be1f3b3294.diff
L
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97443
>From 3a718c75d0458b7aece72f2ba8e5aa5a68815237 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 18:43:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang][RecordLayoutBuilder] Be stricter about inferring
pa
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97443
>From 3a718c75d0458b7aece72f2ba8e5aa5a68815237 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 18:43:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][RecordLayoutBuilder] Be stricter about inferring
pa
Michael137 wrote:
> If I'm understanding correctly, the way this currently works is that you do
> normal field layout, then if you discover that the actual offset of a field
> is less than the offset normal field layout would produce, you assume the
> struct is packed. This misses cases where
@@ -243,14 +244,16 @@ class AnnotatingParser {
// operator that was misinterpreted because we are parsing template
// parameters.
// FIXME: This is getting out of hand, write a decent parser.
- if (InExpr && !Line.startsWith(tok::kw_template) &&
+ if
@@ -693,14 +693,13 @@ ItaniumMangleContextImpl::getEffectiveDeclContext(const
Decl *D) {
if (VD->isExternC())
return getASTContext().getTranslationUnitDecl();
- if (const auto *FD = D->getAsFunction()) {
-if (FD->isExternC())
VitaNuo wrote:
It
https://github.com/VitaNuo edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110503
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -693,14 +693,13 @@ ItaniumMangleContextImpl::getEffectiveDeclContext(const
Decl *D) {
if (VD->isExternC())
return getASTContext().getTranslationUnitDecl();
- if (const auto *FD = D->getAsFunction()) {
-if (FD->isExternC())
- return getASTContext().getTr
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108671
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday requested changes to this pull request.
Can this have some unit test?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
https://github.com/VitaNuo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110503
>From 927a40fc58018f61eaf008672039faa233a6ce50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viktoriia Bakalova
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 12:50:09 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][Itanium Mangle] Enable mangling of enclosing class
AlexVlx wrote:
> Let me clarify myself, _BitInt(N) will work with the change, I have no
> doubts. But I can imagine a SPIR-V extension to appear that would add support
> for 4-bit integers. And I can imagine that we would want to not only be able
> to emit 4-bit integers in the frontend, but a
mydeveloperday wrote:
Looking at Format.h (the only file I'm interested in), there feels to me to be
things in the ABI that I wouldn't expect to be called externally, I don't know
enough about what's involved in creating a DLL ABI but I wouldn't want some of
the clang-format functions to be i
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109505
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
LGTM otherwise
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -29,6 +29,35 @@ namespace std {
#endif
} // namespace std
+namespace cwg2707 { // cwg2707: 20
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+
+template struct A { // #cwg2707-A
+ T value[N];
+};
+
+template
+A(T...) -> A requires (sizeof...(T) == 2); //
#cwg2707-guide-A
+
+// Brace eli
@@ -29,6 +29,35 @@ namespace std {
#endif
} // namespace std
+namespace cwg2707 { // cwg2707: 20
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+
+template struct A { // #cwg2707-A
+ T value[N];
+};
+
+template
+A(T...) -> A requires (sizeof...(T) == 2); //
#cwg2707-guide-A
+
+// Brace eli
https://github.com/jthackray edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jthackray edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
This change undoes a const_cast<> introduced in an earlier change to help
transition to const pointers. It is a part of effort to have better const
correctness in TableGen backends:
https://discourse.llvm.or
erichkeane wrote:
> > So the problem with statement attributes is that we don't really have a
> > good way to do instantiation of them on a template, which is why we held
> > off on this in the first place. The infrastructure for instantiation DOES
> > happen on decl attributes automatically a
ericastor wrote:
> So the problem with statement attributes is that we don't really have a good
> way to do instantiation of them on a template, which is why we held off on
> this in the first place. The infrastructure for instantiation DOES happen on
> decl attributes automatically anyway, so
https://github.com/jurahul ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110747
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ichaer wrote:
@mydeveloperday?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jurahul updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110845
>From fe014ebcc74ca32fc5dddea31589473126b5c766 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rahul Joshi
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 07:01:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC][TableGen] Change `Record::getSuperClasses` to use const
Reco
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2024-10-02T23:15:38+08:00
New Revision: 9b53a6e7e5310e56c404766bf1cf3f21bff59229
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9b53a6e7e5310e56c404766bf1cf3f21bff59229
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9b53a6e7e5310e56c404766bf1cf3f21bff59229.diff
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,12 +1,17 @@
-// RUN: %libomptarget-compile-generic -fprofile-instr-generate \
-// RUN: -Xclang "-fprofile-instrument=clang"
-// RUN: %libomptarget-run-generic 2>&1 | %fcheck-generic \
-// RUN: --check-prefix="CLANG-PGO"
// RUN: %libomptarget-compile-generic -fprofil
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
I have no further comments here, this looks good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99656
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mai
https://github.com/egorzhdan approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110768
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1660,7 +1660,7 @@ class Record {
// this record.
SmallVector Locs;
SmallVector ForwardDeclarationLocs;
- SmallVector ReferenceLocs;
+ mutable SmallVector ReferenceLocs;
arsenm wrote:
You have the const_cast on the addition, so this is unnecessary?
https://github.com/matinraayai updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110443
>From 6a78a683f4834049c07f9672c358dcbb44ac14e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: matinraayai <30674652+matinraa...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:54:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/19] Made MMIW
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+//===-- LLVMTargetMachineC.cpp
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/matinraayai updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110443
>From 6a78a683f4834049c07f9672c358dcbb44ac14e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: matinraayai <30674652+matinraa...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:54:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/20] Made MMIW
https://github.com/jvoung ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110870
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jan Voung (jvoung)
Changes
createStorageLocation used in transferCallReturningOptional:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/09ba83be0ac178851e3c9c9c8fefddbdd4d8353f/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Models/UncheckedOptionalAccessModel.
https://github.com/matinraayai updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110443
>From 6a78a683f4834049c07f9672c358dcbb44ac14e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: matinraayai <30674652+matinraa...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:54:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/19] Made MMIW
https://github.com/davemgreen approved this pull request.
This LGTM if there are no other comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
@@ -118,9 +118,9 @@ struct ArchInfo {
// Defines the following partial order, indicating when an architecture is
// a superset of another:
//
- // v9.5a > v9.4a > v9.3a > v9.2a > v9.1a > v9a;
- // v v v v v
- // v8.9a > v
https://github.com/davemgreen edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/matinraayai updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110443
>From 6a78a683f4834049c07f9672c358dcbb44ac14e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: matinraayai <30674652+matinraa...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:54:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/21] Made MMIW
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110767
>From 53bfa785514f9811952aa5122f60d16129136285 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 00:42:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][DebugInfo] Revert to printing canonical typenames
dwblaikie wrote:
Not quite sure how we get to caching and template specializations and pretty
printers.
If we're still producing the typedef-style DWARF for these alias template
specializations - perhaps lldb could not cache pretty printers for typedefs? (I
guess the pretty printers shouldn't
compnerd wrote:
> Looking at Format.h (the only file I'm interested in), there feels to me to
> be things in the ABI that I wouldn't expect to be called externally, I don't
> know enough about what's involved in creating a DLL ABI but I wouldn't want
> some of the clang-format functions to be
cor3ntin wrote:
> sorry this is same as #107906 (with a bigger impact radius, as you're also
> changing getBufferForFile) and doesn't address any of the issues mention
> about explaining the semantics of `IsText` or justification for changing the
> core VFS interfaces, for an operation that's
Author: Rahul Joshi
Date: 2024-10-02T09:48:26-07:00
New Revision: d256b9e88b7aa9155380a4e70d39a2a0121ff917
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d256b9e88b7aa9155380a4e70d39a2a0121ff917
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d256b9e88b7aa9155380a4e70d39a2a0121ff917.diff
L
https://github.com/jurahul closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110747
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110887
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110887
Otherwise, we would probably have an unmatched instantiated declaration for
init-captures when they come after a non-init capture.
No release note because the bug only affects the trunk.
Fixes #110721
>From 0
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217)
Changes
Otherwise, we would probably have an unmatched instantiated declaration for
init-captures when they come after a non-init capture.
No release note because the bug only affects the trunk so far.
Fixes #11072
@@ -251,6 +251,13 @@ bool RISCVABIInfo::detectFPCCEligibleStructHelper(QualType
Ty, CharUnits CurOff,
// bitwidth is XLen or less.
if (getContext().getTypeSize(QTy) > XLen && BitWidth <= XLen)
QTy = getContext().getIntTypeForBitwidth(XLen, false);
+
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110887
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Michael137 wrote:
> If we're still producing the typedef-style DWARF for these alias template
> specializations - perhaps lldb could not cache pretty printers for typedefs?
> (I guess the pretty printers shouldn't be typedef-specific, right, since
> typedefs are transparent anyway - but I gues
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110767
>From 53bfa785514f9811952aa5122f60d16129136285 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 00:42:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][DebugInfo] Revert to printing canonical typenames
https://github.com/jurahul ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110845
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jurahul edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110845
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-tablegen
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
Change `Record::getSuperClasses` to return a const pointer to the superclass
records.
This is a part of effort to have better const correctness in TableGen backends:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/psa-plann
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
Change `Record::getSuperClasses` to return a const pointer to the superclass
records.
This is a part of effort to have better const correctness in TableGen backends:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/psa-planned-
rjmccall wrote:
I don't think there's a deep reason blocks and lambdas don't use quite the same
scope mechanics in the compiler, so if you wanted to pursue that, it seems
reasonable. But this approach also seems viable. I agree that removing the
assertion would be the wrong thing to do, and
https://github.com/Cydox updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110497
>From 15b69329a97706ada7d5e8cbeb76508aa55b418f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Hendrik Farr
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 21:38:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] Fix 'counted_by' for nested struct pointers
Fixes
@@ -1164,15 +1163,15 @@ llvm::Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitLoadOfCountedByField(
return nullptr;
llvm::Value *Res = nullptr;
- if (StructBase->isLValue()) {
-LValue LV = EmitLValue(StructBase);
-Address Addr = LV.getAddress();
-Res = Addr.emitRawPointer(*this
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-10-02T18:01:25-07:00
New Revision: 6ae14c0505e92cceefc1757467e4a2eb797429e6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6ae14c0505e92cceefc1757467e4a2eb797429e6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6ae14c0505e92cceefc1757467e4a2eb797429e6.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Cydox wrote:
So, this doesn't fully work yet. When compiling the kernel it seems like there
are cases were `StructBase` is now both an LValue and a pointer. Still
investigating.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110497
___
cfe-commits mailing
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-arm-ubuntu` running
on `linaro-lldb-arm-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/18/builds/4846
Here is the relevant piece of the build log
Cydox wrote:
Yeah so the problem is if you do `__builtin_dynamic_object_size(v, 0)`
In that case it's a `DeclRefExpr`, a pointer, and an `LValue`.
Easy fix is to check if `StructBase` is a pointer instead of checking for
LValue, but then I don't really see the point of this change vs my origin
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-10-02T18:07:57-07:00
New Revision: 98281da29f7e36e22ff1e20b9cfefda8c31dbe56
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/98281da29f7e36e22ff1e20b9cfefda8c31dbe56
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/98281da29f7e36e22ff1e20b9cfefda8c31dbe56.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109505
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109916
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-10-02T18:10:56-07:00
New Revision: 688bc958bd4167512f0d45e1fd008c9551de1c75
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/688bc958bd4167512f0d45e1fd008c9551de1c75
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/688bc958bd4167512f0d45e1fd008c9551de1c75.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110408
>From 27135c008868cc4f17b7ca5ff9c2af9c2fc02135 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 22:42:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Handle template closer followed by empty
parethese
@@ -522,6 +526,28 @@ let Predicates = [BPFNoALU32] in {
}
def STD : STOREi64;
+class relaxed_store
+ : PatFrag<(ops node:$val, node:$ptr), (base node:$val, node:$ptr)> {
+ let IsAtomic = 1;
+ let IsAtomicOrderingReleaseOrStronger = 0;
+}
+
+class releasing_store
+ : PatFra
Cydox wrote:
Now this passes all tests again, also compiles the kernel without issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110497
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Sirraide updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110762
>From a471d32c94bfcbd10291053bb6ce0541ea2e626c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 00:59:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] [Sema] Don't crash on unexpanded pack in invalid
block l
Sirraide wrote:
> LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-arm-ubuntu`
Looks like the failure is somewhere in an LLDB test, so I think we can ignore
this because that’s completely unrelated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99656
___
https://github.com/Cydox updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110497
>From 15b69329a97706ada7d5e8cbeb76508aa55b418f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Hendrik Farr
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 21:38:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] Fix 'counted_by' for nested struct pointers
Fixes
@@ -1164,15 +1163,15 @@ llvm::Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitLoadOfCountedByField(
return nullptr;
llvm::Value *Res = nullptr;
- if (StructBase->isLValue()) {
-LValue LV = EmitLValue(StructBase);
-Address Addr = LV.getAddress();
-Res = Addr.emitRawPointer(*this
https://github.com/VitaNuo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110503
>From 927a40fc58018f61eaf008672039faa233a6ce50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viktoriia Bakalova
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 12:50:09 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][Itanium Mangle] Enable mangling of enclosing class
https://github.com/jurahul updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110747
>From 4983aef1a62d9f3611e4ae8ed2feeb77d8729d98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rahul Joshi
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 12:05:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [TableGen] Change `DefInit::Def` to a const Record pointer
---
..
JonPsson1 wrote:
Patch updated after some progress...
With this version, the fp16 values are passed to conversion functions as
integer, which seems to be the default. It is however a bit tricky to do this
and at the same time pass half values in FP registers.
At this point I wonder for one th
@@ -164,6 +164,40 @@ TEST_F(MatchFilePathTest, Path) {
EXPECT_FALSE(match("foo\\", R"(foo*\)"));
}
+TEST_F(MatchFilePathTest, DoubleAsterisk) {
+ EXPECT_TRUE(match("a/b/c/d.cpp", "**b**"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(match("a/b/c/d.cpp", "**/b/**"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(match("a/b/c/d_e.cpp
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110408
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -164,6 +164,40 @@ TEST_F(MatchFilePathTest, Path) {
EXPECT_FALSE(match("foo\\", R"(foo*\)"));
}
+TEST_F(MatchFilePathTest, DoubleAsterisk) {
+ EXPECT_TRUE(match("a/b/c/d.cpp", "**b**"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(match("a/b/c/d.cpp", "**/b/**"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(match("a/b/c/d_e.cpp
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
I like this as a "Get our of jail free card", we've seen enough ambiguous cases
for this to need to be a thing for those who face challenges
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109916
__
MrSidims wrote:
> You want spirv, not spir
Thanks! Yet the result is the same.
> Do you plan to go over LLVM passes adding this check?
So guess answer to my question would be: "no" :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110695
___
cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217)
Changes
This addresses comments from @Endilll in the post commit review of
#110473.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110842.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg27xx.
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110842
This addresses comments from @Endilll in the post commit review of #110473.
>From 5660d1ee7f5b815061f04e2f77eb1abced041ea6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 21:41:53 +0800
Subje
zyn0217 wrote:
@Endilll Filed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110842 for your
comments. PTAL, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110473
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mai
@@ -29,6 +29,35 @@ namespace std {
#endif
} // namespace std
+namespace cwg2707 { // cwg2707: 20
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+
+template struct A { // #cwg2707-A
+ T value[N];
+};
+
+template
+A(T...) -> A requires (sizeof...(T) == 2); //
#cwg2707-guide-A
+
+// Brace eli
@@ -601,17 +601,23 @@ void test() {
std::optional o4 = std::optional(s);
// FIXME: should work for assignment cases
hokein wrote:
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108205
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/hokein updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108205
>From ff2f955965fd5f8f17ae76a11e495217aa4f02fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 13:26:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Detect dangling assignment for "Container"
case.
---
clang
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110842
>From 5660d1ee7f5b815061f04e2f77eb1abced041ea6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 21:41:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][NFC] Rearrange tests for CWG 2707 after #110473
---
@@ -601,17 +601,23 @@ void test() {
std::optional o4 = std::optional(s);
// FIXME: should work for assignment cases
- v1 = {std::string()};
- o1 = std::string();
+ v1 = {std::string()}; // expected-warning {{object backing the pointer}}
+ o1 = std::string(); // expect
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+//===-- LLVMTargetMachineC.cpp
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
301 - 400 of 462 matches
Mail list logo
