dwblaikie wrote: Not quite sure how we get to caching and template specializations and pretty printers.
If we're still producing the typedef-style DWARF for these alias template specializations - perhaps lldb could not cache pretty printers for typedefs? (I guess the pretty printers shouldn't be typedef-specific, right, since typedefs are transparent anyway - but I guess maybe pretty printers can be typedef-specific because typedefs can be intended to communicate what kind of a thing is and possibly how to render it?) - it'll cache teh pretty printer for the underlying type anyway, yeah? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110767 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
