@@ -326,6 +326,21 @@ class FPMathOperator : public Operator {
/// precision.
float getFPAccuracy() const;
+ /// Returns true if `Ty` is a supported floating-point type for phi, select,
+ /// or call FPMathOperators.
+ static bool isSupportedFloatingPointType(Type *Ty) {
https://github.com/MacDue updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110506
>From 328357f2300ebe55b8385c01f9c655f703933736 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benjamin Maxwell
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:07:45 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [IR] Allow fast math flags on calls with homogeneous FP
s
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Daniel Grumberg (daniel-grumberg)
Changes
When an anonymous type has a typedef we normally use the typedef's name in
places where we expect a named identifier in the symbol graph. This extends
this logic to apply to subheadings.
rdar://1
Cydox wrote:
Removed the special case for DeclRefExpr, as this can also be handled by the
pointer case. A few were adjusted, but none of them changed any behavior.
That additional commit is not necessary to fix anything, it's just cleanup.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110497
_
https://github.com/KamranYousafzai created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110690
The code generated for calls with FPCC eligible structs as arguments doesn't
consider the alignment with a bitfield, which results in a store crossing the
boundary of the memory allocated using alloca,
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Kamran Yousafzai (KamranYousafzai)
Changes
The code generated for calls with FPCC eligible structs as arguments doesn't
consider the alignment with a bitfield, which results in a store crossing the
boundary of the memory allocate
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Kamran Yousafzai (KamranYousafzai)
Changes
The code generated for calls with FPCC eligible structs as arguments doesn't
consider the alignment with a bitfield, which results in a store crossing the
boundary of the memory allocated
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kamran Yousafzai (KamranYousafzai)
Changes
The code generated for calls with FPCC eligible structs as arguments doesn't
consider the alignment with a bitfield, which results in a store crossing the
boundary of the memory allocated using a
https://github.com/KamranYousafzai edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110690
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110654
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-10-01T12:04:32+02:00
New Revision: 7147e88f5502c4430e386247e92937a94b3e7c5b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7147e88f5502c4430e386247e92937a94b3e7c5b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7147e88f5502c4430e386247e92937a94b3e7c5b.diff
L
https://github.com/MacDue updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110506
>From 328357f2300ebe55b8385c01f9c655f703933736 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benjamin Maxwell
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:07:45 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [IR] Allow fast math flags on calls with homogeneous FP
s
abhina-sree wrote:
> > @perry-ca raised some concerns in #109664 about this functionality
> > requiring some context awareness, I don't think any of those is addressed
> > by this patch either. Pretty much all of the callers apart from ASTReader
> > is just using `IsText = true`.
>
> It just
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
tbaederr wrote:
Moved it back into `ThreadAnalysis.cpp`. I'm still only comparing the number of
args, but I'd like better diagnostics for this. I
https://github.com/Cydox updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110497
>From 15b69329a97706ada7d5e8cbeb76508aa55b418f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Hendrik Farr
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 21:38:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Fix 'counted_by' for nested struct pointers
Fixes
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Ryan Saunders (jediry)
Changes
This change adds support for clang-format's BasedOnStyle to reference an
explicit, arbitrary file, using syntax like:
```BasedOnStyle: file:../../format/my-team.clang-format```
or
```BasedOnStyle: fil
https://github.com/4vtomat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100346
>From 15161b0b7637d52b6285624a4bf9f52a6664082c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brandon Wu
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 09:49:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [RISCV][VLS] Support RISCV VLS calling convention
This patch a
https://github.com/KamranYousafzai updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110690
>From 69d04c6b48f1fad94d696a1cd2be66d7438f9c4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "muhammad.kamran4"
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:21:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fixed fp calling convention for fpcc eligible struct
https://github.com/jurahul closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110584
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff b8b036a7fe5b6e7ec306e3b80367e22d157a492b
d30b8c9893479482eec7e1cd43bf8ebc5196d042 --e
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-10-01T15:12:09+01:00
New Revision: cb52e8e13d97b0e3972b42298b19d02e4d066db4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cb52e8e13d97b0e3972b42298b19d02e4d066db4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cb52e8e13d97b0e3972b42298b19d02e4d066db4.diff
https://github.com/frederic-tingaud-sonarsource updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110666
>From be911d8d0a00d5c6d42b23b40ca6d6abec51966c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fred Tingaud
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 16:10:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Handle variable templates in isInstantiated a
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM. I gave this a try and it seems to work well!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108425
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
Author: Rahul Joshi
Date: 2024-10-01T06:51:49-07:00
New Revision: 017c2aba61a2a0c97c7e71aa7610de7f3c0150e6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/017c2aba61a2a0c97c7e71aa7610de7f3c0150e6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/017c2aba61a2a0c97c7e71aa7610de7f3c0150e6.diff
L
https://github.com/kiranchandramohan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109965
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/RKSimon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94161
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kiran Chandramohan
Date: 2024-10-01T15:01:32+01:00
New Revision: 28be39f174f109923c321b4111d21028db432e3e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/28be39f174f109923c321b4111d21028db432e3e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/28be39f174f109923c321b4111d21028db432e3e.
perry-ca wrote:
> @perry-ca raised some concerns in #109664 about this functionality requiring
> some context awareness, I don't think any of those is addressed by this patch
> either. Pretty much all of the callers apart from ASTReader is just using
> `IsText = true`.
It just happens that 90
@@ -600,6 +600,7 @@ namespace cwg336 { // cwg336: yes
template<> template class A::B {};
template<> template<> template void A::B::mf1(T t) {}
// expected-error@-1 {{out-of-line definition of 'mf1' does not match any
declaration in 'cwg336::Pre::A::B'}}
+// exp
Author: c8ef
Date: 2024-10-01T06:39:10-07:00
New Revision: bb78a0b33496fb0140cec1a92a689505f53253b7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bb78a0b33496fb0140cec1a92a689505f53253b7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bb78a0b33496fb0140cec1a92a689505f53253b7.diff
LOG: [cl
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ namespace MultilevelSpecialization {
template<> template
void B::f(int i, int (&arr1)[a], int (&arr2)[b]) {}
// since-cxx11-error@-1 {{out-of-line definition of 'f' does not match any
declaration in 'cwg2233::MultilevelSpecialization::B'}}
+//
https://github.com/erichkeane closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109831
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
everythingfunctional wrote:
> Shouldn't `-fopenacc` then also emit such a warning?
Well, we could get into a philosophical discussion about whether software is
ever *not* experimental. But in this case I think it's fine to be a bit
proactive and warn users that we know there are still some unf
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
Implementation seems fine to me, but wait for other reviewers before merging.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/
@@ -13464,6 +13464,54 @@ bool IntExprEvaluator::VisitBuiltinCallExpr(const
CallExpr *E,
return Success(DidOverflow, E);
}
+ case clang::X86::BI__builtin_ia32_addcarryx_u32:
+ case clang::X86::BI__builtin_ia32_addcarryx_u64: {
+LValue ResultLValue;
+APSInt Carr
Author: Rahul Joshi
Date: 2024-10-01T06:53:13-07:00
New Revision: fdfd326a012f76bcab37e09e2d452fb379827676
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fdfd326a012f76bcab37e09e2d452fb379827676
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fdfd326a012f76bcab37e09e2d452fb379827676.diff
L
Author: Daniel Krupp
Date: 2024-10-01T11:33:06+02:00
New Revision: 09b8dbfa80d62e64efb09bd166324270c96badf9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/09b8dbfa80d62e64efb09bd166324270c96badf9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/09b8dbfa80d62e64efb09bd166324270c96badf9.diff
RKSimon wrote:
Closing as these have now all been addressed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94161
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Simon Pilgrim (RKSimon)
Changes
With this patch all BMI2 intrinsics can now be used in constant expressions
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110654.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modif
https://github.com/s-perron closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110542
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Simon Pilgrim (RKSimon)
Changes
ADC and ADX use the same internal intrinsics - for testing I've taken a same
approach as the generic builtin overfloaw tests, putting the intrinsics in a
constexpr test wrapper and comparing the carry/resul
Author: Steven Perron
Date: 2024-10-01T09:29:20-04:00
New Revision: be6b4f69799861dc1f175a53c9a15d3c8afd3ed2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be6b4f69799861dc1f175a53c9a15d3c8afd3ed2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/be6b4f69799861dc1f175a53c9a15d3c8afd3ed2.diff
qiongsiwu wrote:
@hubert-reinterpretcast and @w2yehia could you take a look at this PR? We can
land this PR if you both are OK with it. Currently, the PR only impacts AIX.
Thanks so much!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108570
___
cfe-comm
https://github.com/RKSimon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110654
>From bb035536e40219a725186554d0536d58895e7797 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Pilgrim
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 13:04:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][x86] Add constexpr support for MULX intrinsics
With
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109804
From 23b27377e556085054621f27d97059618b416695 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:42:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [analyzer] Suppress out of bounds reports a
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110673.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.h (+5-4)
- (modified) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/records.cpp (+8)
```
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110673
None
>From 43fdc0a7ea6b28bfad77d88e9d727e7752edb9d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:32:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Check GetPtrBase ops for
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110585
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jurahul closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110590
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
NagyDonat wrote:
> We can always have a map, mapping ForStmts to finished iterations. Basically,
> from the ErrorNode, we could walk backwards (as usual in a visitor like
> that), and check if the current ProgramPoint is PostStmt. We would then grab
> the wrapped Stmt to see if it's the termin
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110673
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -325,6 +325,8 @@ class DeclSpec {
#define HLSL_INTANGIBLE_TYPE(Name, Id, SingletonId)
\
static const TST TST_##Name = clang::TST_##Name;
#include "clang/Basic/HLSLIntangibleTypes.def"
+ // AARCH64_OPAQUE_TYPE
+ static const TST TST_ArmMFloat8_
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-10-01T17:09:26+02:00
New Revision: 55c70f6d893452d3b7b2005bc6b5d208f2e840ba
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/55c70f6d893452d3b7b2005bc6b5d208f2e840ba
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/55c70f6d893452d3b7b2005bc6b5d208f2e840ba.diff
L
https://github.com/erichkeane created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110684
'collapse' makes the 'loop' construct apply to the next N nested loops,
and 'loop' requires all associated loops be 'for' loops (or range-for).
This patch adds this restriction, plus adds a number of infras
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-10-01T17:17:37+02:00
New Revision: f3baa73c8b212cc039abf1bc3bb2024df8acae02
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f3baa73c8b212cc039abf1bc3bb2024df8acae02
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f3baa73c8b212cc039abf1bc3bb2024df8acae02.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110675
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Martin Storsjö
Date: 2024-10-01T11:14:11+03:00
New Revision: 0cf4cb4bde440586c310554d93dc09e47cb9bb79
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0cf4cb4bde440586c310554d93dc09e47cb9bb79
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0cf4cb4bde440586c310554d93dc09e47cb9bb79.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Erich Keane (erichkeane)
Changes
'collapse' makes the 'loop' construct apply to the next N nested loops,
and 'loop' requires all associated loops be 'for' loops (or range-for).
This patch adds this restriction, plus adds a number of infr
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67520
>From 1c117257921fc1c246fbb9f51e3c95d6dc6d295e Mon Sep 17 00:
https://github.com/abhina-sree updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110661
>From 1a5096483d5d6d84087e913b20f6f260452988b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Abhina Sreeskantharajan
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 15:32:09 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Propagate IsText parameter to openFileForRead funct
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-; This test aims to check ability to support "Arithmetic with Overflow"
intrinsics
VyacheslavLevytskyy wrote:
@AlexVlx I'm strongly against deleting this test case.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110695
_
Artem-B wrote:
> This patch checks for numeric literals in clearly identifiable host code if
> they are the result of expanding the wavefront-size macros and issues a
> diagnostic if that's the case.
What's the ultimate goal here? If we're OK to warn on some obvious misuses,
then it may do.
bjope wrote:
Seeing same fault as @zeroomega .
I think problem is related to LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR. When that is
set to ON the install path is extended (in libunwind/CMakeLIsts.txt):
```
set(LIBUNWIND_TARGET_SUBDIR ${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE})
if(LIBUNWIND_LIBDIR_SUBDIR)
https://github.com/francisvm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110198
>From 840989c7e1f098b1773b49bf287b0d54ff81b425 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francis Visoiu Mistrih
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 18:05:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Add __builtin_elementwise|reduce_max|minimum
https://github.com/hokein approved this pull request.
Thanks, the change looks good to me.
Please also add a note in the `clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llv
https://github.com/zimirza updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110366
From 4fb69942effb3cf34d07f33a14a95757b6ca5ee0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=D0=97=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B0=D0=BD=20=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=80=D0=B7?=
=?UTF-8?q?=D0=B0?=
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 17:05:42 +0200
Subjec
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
Rename option parsing related files from OptXYZ -> OptionXYZ, since Opt
could be confused with optimization and Opt as a short hand for Option is not
really that smaller to warrant it
https://github.com/jurahul ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110692
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
Rename option parsing related files from OptXYZ -> OptionXYZ, since Opt
could be confused with optimization and Opt as a short hand for Option is not
really that smaller to warrant its use.
---
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
Rename option parsing related files from OptXYZ -> OptionXYZ, since Opt
could be confused with optimization and Opt as a short hand for Option is not
really that smaller to warrant its use.
---
Patch is 53.2
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Cyndy Ishida (cyndyishida)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110724.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSerializationKinds.td (+2-2)
``diff
diff --git a/clan
@@ -13464,6 +13464,38 @@ bool IntExprEvaluator::VisitBuiltinCallExpr(const
CallExpr *E,
return Success(DidOverflow, E);
}
+ case clang::X86::BI__builtin_ia32_addcarryx_u32:
+ case clang::X86::BI__builtin_ia32_addcarryx_u64:
+ case clang::X86::BI__builtin_ia32_subborr
https://github.com/MrSidims commented:
Thanks, it should make LLVM IR after optimizations more translatable in SPIR-V!
Few questions though:
1. Usually (or at least AFAIK) optimization passes won't consider datalayout
automatically, as LLVM defines datalayout not as a contract set by the
front
dexonsmith wrote:
> An immediate fix would be to not set the "identifier" field for the
> DICompositeType when it's created if it's inside a function scope to avoid
> ODRUniqing. I've only got a light understanding of what the identifier field
> is for, so there might be unexpected consequence
https://github.com/RKSimon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110668
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vsapsai approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110724
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lld-x86_64-win` running on
`as-worker-93` while building `clang,llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/146/builds/1285
Here is the releva
https://github.com/francisvm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110198
>From cd66c08ce939f5fd205408dc50ed9cbfedbac927 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francis Visoiu Mistrih
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 18:05:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Add __builtin_elementwise|reduce_max|minimum
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110198
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x86_64-debian-fast`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/56/builds/8784
Here is the rele
https://github.com/trcrsired updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79667
>From 2b526821d4e70f3ea83f95d25f804d9fbcf82612 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: cqwrteur <100043421+trcrsi...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 02:55:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [libunwind][libcxx][lib
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-; This test aims to check ability to support "Arithmetic with Overflow"
intrinsics
arsenm wrote:
That is not the nature of this kind of test
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110695
___
cfe-c
trcrsired wrote:
@EricWF You need to build it with wasi-libc
```cpp
mkdir -p "$CURRENTTRIPLEPATH/build/runtimes"
cd $CURRENTTRIPLEPATH/build/runtimes
cmake $LLVMPROJECTPATH/runtimes \
-GNinja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++
-DC
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-; This test aims to check ability to support "Arithmetic with Overflow"
intrinsics
VyacheslavLevytskyy wrote:
The main objection is that the code base should switch from one stable state to
another, without losing current coverage, stability,
https://github.com/Sirraide approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Sirraide approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110724
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cyndyishida created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110724
None
>From b78a9a6649adaa1b0f7252733995ece7d1cebee0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 17:07:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Remove 'PCH' from more diagnostics that were wr
yxsamliu wrote:
`__AMDGCN_WAVEFRONT_SIZE__` could also be used in other offloading languages
e.g. OpenMP. The check for non-constantness is not specific to HIP.
It is a constant when the triple is amdgcn and -target-cpu is specified.
Otherwise it should not be treated as constant.
I think you
Author: Zibi Sarbinowski
Date: 2024-10-01T15:24:27-04:00
New Revision: 9ec229dd3ede6368ee5fecf9b9731d8d21d8b1d2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9ec229dd3ede6368ee5fecf9b9731d8d21d8b1d2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9ec229dd3ede6368ee5fecf9b9731d8d21d8b1d2.di
https://github.com/zibi2 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109676
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/9056
Here is the re
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ namespace MultilevelSpecialization {
template<> template
void B::f(int i, int (&arr1)[a], int (&arr2)[b]) {}
// since-cxx11-error@-1 {{out-of-line definition of 'f' does not match any
declaration in 'cwg2233::MultilevelSpecialization::B'}}
+//
mikecrowe wrote:
@PiotrZSL, it doesn't look like this change has automatically been assigned
reviewers. Since you've reviewed my PRs in the past would you mind looking at
and landing this one if it's appropriate? Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110428
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110675
None
>From e57f67c73af56e510943612e4eff651838706b9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:41:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Implement ia32_{pdep,pex
https://github.com/joaosaffran updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109331
>From ef969c536d700a8585f0892952fae49cdd9c42d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joao Saffran
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:13:51 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] Codegen builtin
---
clang/include/clang/Basic/Builtin
snehasish wrote:
> The major motivation is to detect dead functions for the services that are
> optimized with sampling PGO.
For your use case, can you use
[ProfileSymbolList](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/32ffc9fdc2cd422c88c926b862adb3de726e3888/llvm/include/llvm/ProfileData/Sampl
@@ -29,22 +29,21 @@
namespace __cxxabiv1 {
+#if defined(__wasm__)
+typedef void* (*__libcpp_exception_destructor_func)(void*);
arichardson wrote:
Could keep the existing comment here `// In Wasm, a destructor returns its
argument` to explain why it is d
@@ -98,73 +89,58 @@ extern _LIBCXXABI_FUNC_VIS _LIBCXXABI_NORETURN void
__cxa_pure_virtual(void);
extern _LIBCXXABI_FUNC_VIS _LIBCXXABI_NORETURN void
__cxa_deleted_virtual(void);
// 3.3.2 One-time Construction API
-#if defined(_LIBCXXABI_GUARD_ABI_ARM)
-extern _LIBCXXABI_FUN
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-; This test aims to check ability to support "Arithmetic with Overflow"
intrinsics
AlexVlx wrote:
Can you please elaborate on "why"? Again, this relies on an opportunistic
optimisation, that is not crucial / can be superseded by others. If the
201 - 300 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
