https://github.com/hokein approved this pull request.
Thanks for the cleanup, this looks good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94311
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
https://github.com/Meinersbur edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93519
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Meinersbur edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93519
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
a1batross wrote:
> I saw some comments on this. Looks like some were deleted maybe. This is
> still in my queue, but unclear when I'll get back to it.
Yeah, sorry, I posted a comment here but decided it was a bit irrelevant. :)
But going to ask anyway then. Can this setting remove the space fr
jh7370 wrote:
> (Friendly Ping:)
Sorry, a combination of PTO and other factors have delayed me in getting to
this. It's on my radar, but will likely be a few more days before I can sink my
teeth into more complex reviews like this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91280
_
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-06-04T15:28:24+08:00
New Revision: 799ae77993fa5d7b0638f10b3895090f8748de92
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/799ae77993fa5d7b0638f10b3895090f8748de92
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/799ae77993fa5d7b0638f10b3895090f8748de92.diff
LO
@@ -3896,7 +3903,7 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteIdentifierTable(Preprocessor &PP,
// Write out identifiers if either the ID is local or the identifier has
// changed since it was loaded.
- if (ID >= FirstIdentID || !Chain || !II->isFromAST() ||
+ if (isLocalId
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: c8ef
Date: 2024-06-04T09:34:21+02:00
New Revision: ade4259d75d61d4366538b5ee975cac606d43d3c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ade4259d75d61d4366538b5ee975cac606d43d3c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ade4259d75d61d4366538b5ee975cac606d43d3c.diff
LOG: [cl
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@c8ef Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a build, yo
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94311
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2024-06-04T09:35:35+02:00
New Revision: 6bc71bac8728b30b560f7ae210917072b01b8046
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6bc71bac8728b30b560f7ae210917072b01b8046
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6bc71bac8728b30b560f7ae210917072b01b8046.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93867
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92085
>From e8f756ec7f8ea7e5bf18cc122a965fb2f258fd15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 15:33:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Serialization] No transitive identifier change
---
.../clang/L
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Brandon Wu (4vtomat)
Changes
---
Patch is 171.04 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94318.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/riscv_vector.td (+2-1)
-
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 799ae77993fa5d7b0638f10b3895090f8748de92
e8f756ec7f8ea7e5bf18cc122a965fb2f258fd15 --
cor3ntin wrote:
@AaronBallman @erichkeane ping!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Meinersbur wrote:
@alexey-bataev ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92916
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93879
>From 87fe5df0bb46a6bea9b33f30bcb5588f04bef080 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Farzon Lotfi
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 13:51:35 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [HLSL] add loop unroll - `Attr.td` - Define the HLSL loop
att
Michael137 wrote:
Unfortunately this is still failing one test on the macOS CI:
https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/5083/execution/node/97/log
```
==
FAIL: test_duplicate_decls_gmodules
(TestTem
Author: Balázs Kéri
Date: 2024-06-04T10:02:38+02:00
New Revision: bc3baa93ce5142fcdc2dc5a7d27e26a32999116d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bc3baa93ce5142fcdc2dc5a7d27e26a32999116d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bc3baa93ce5142fcdc2dc5a7d27e26a32999116d.diff
L
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93980
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Oh, this is not wanted. It should be almost a NFC patch for users. I'll revert
it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92083
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-06-04T16:10:38+08:00
New Revision: cb60667b6e762aa172b6ad06332465d69f0fd803
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cb60667b6e762aa172b6ad06332465d69f0fd803
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cb60667b6e762aa172b6ad06332465d69f0fd803.diff
LO
glandium wrote:
This broke building clang on Windows with PGO:
```
FAILED: bin/clang-repl.exe lib/clang-repl.lib
cmd.exe /C "cmd.exe /C "D:\task_171745452431588\fetches\cmake\bin\cmake.exe -E
__create_def
D:\task_171745452431588\fetches\llvm-project\build\stage2\build\tools\clang\tools\clang-r
pointhex wrote:
> Can you call `parseConfiguration()` instead of `getStyle()` in QtCreator
> while the user is entering code? It seems inefficient to call `getStyle()`
> all the time.
I do it in the places where I can use parseConfiguration instead. But in some
cases I need getStyle and it's
Michael137 wrote:
> Oh, this is not wanted. It should be almost a NFC patch for users. I'll
> revert it.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92083
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
https://github.com/Fznamznon commented:
I wonder if we should always emit an error when a function with non-void return
type doesn't have a return statement? In any case it is a serious yet dumb bug
that will lead to problems and perhaps some time spent debugging it.
gcc rejects the case for C+
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -Wno-return-type -std=c++23 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+constexpr int f() { }
+static_assert(__is_same(decltype([] constexpr -> int { }( )), int));
Fznamznon wrote:
Should we emit at least a warning in
https://github.com/Fznamznon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94123
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2487,6 +2477,26 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
return true;
}
+static bool CheckConstexprMissingReturn(Sema &SemaRef,
+const FunctionDecl *Dcl) {
+ bool IsVoidOrDependentType = D
@@ -1442,19 +1442,27 @@ SourceLocation
CXXUnresolvedConstructExpr::getBeginLoc() const {
CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr::CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr(
const ASTContext &Ctx, Expr *Base, QualType BaseType, bool IsArrow,
SourceLocation OperatorLoc, NestedNameSpecifierLoc Qua
DavidSpickett wrote:
> MSVC 14.29.30133 is VS 2019. We are using VS 2022 with the latest Windows SDK
> to build lldb w/o problems.
I also couldn't reproduce it locally with `19.34.31937`, but I may still be
able to reproduce by making my own version of this PR so I can use the CI's
version.
diegorusso wrote:
We (CPython project) will use it for the new JIT. I'll be testing the current
implementation and report back any issue. I don't think you need to revert the
PR but please let me know when you create the new one to address the post-merge
comments so I can test it again.
Thank
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-06-04T17:08:21+08:00
New Revision: 99873b35da7ecb905143c8a6b8deca4d4416f1a9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/99873b35da7ecb905143c8a6b8deca4d4416f1a9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/99873b35da7ecb905143c8a6b8deca4d4416f1a9.diff
LO
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+//===--- UseInternalLinkageCheck.cpp -
clang-tidy--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/tbaederr approved this pull request.
Looks good, thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-06-04T13:18:56+04:00
New Revision: c631131a1490af9f908a3a3be9aae5295ecff67d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c631131a1490af9f908a3a3be9aae5295ecff67d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c631131a1490af9f908a3a3be9aae5295ecff67d.
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr commented:
`Interp/` changes LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94118
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
I think the issue is
https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/c-shared-state-futuresstate-default-constructs-the/60897
which appears to have been fixed in 19.32 (https://godbolt.org/z/P594qGrc9).
But @slydiman reports 14.29.30133 which is earlier than that. Perhaps th
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+//===--- UseInternalLinkageCheck.cpp -
clang-tidy--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75912
>From cf8be3c418dde67b74d4a5a4ea98a33f0e2fbd72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:00:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [C++20] [Modules] [Itanium ABI] Generate the vtable in the
modul
@@ -1180,6 +1185,21 @@ bool CodeGenVTables::isVTableExternal(const
CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
TSK == TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition)
return false;
+ // Itanium C++ ABI [5.2.3]:
+ // Virtual tables for dynamic classes are emitted as follows:
+ //
+ // - If the cla
https://github.com/labrinea edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94279
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pdherbemont updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
>From ccf6699197b608f95deea2b03b1ee87e29fbc8e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre d'Herbemont
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:11:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Support [[guarded_by(mutex)]] attribute inside C struct
@@ -58,58 +58,57 @@ void v1msve() {}
// CHECK-LABEL: @plussve() #12
__attribute__((target("+sve")))
void plussve() {}
-// CHECK-LABEL: @plussveplussve2() #13
+// CHECK-LABEL: @plussveplussve2() #12
__attribute__((target("+sve+nosve2")))
void plussveplussve2() {}
-// CHECK-LAB
https://github.com/labrinea edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94279
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -286,7 +286,6 @@ void AArch64TargetInfo::getTargetDefinesARMV84A(const
LangOptions &Opts,
void AArch64TargetInfo::getTargetDefinesARMV85A(const LangOptions &Opts,
MacroBuilder &Builder) const {
Builder.defineMacro("__ARM_FEA
https://github.com/tmatheson-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92600
>From 518b83ab69c4852f7e7ea71c17df3f58e8ff50ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomas Matheson
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 21:39:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [AArch64] set AppleA14 architecture version to 8.5
--
@@ -718,12 +718,16 @@ def ProcessorFeatures {
list AppleA13 = [HasV8_4aOps, FeatureCrypto,
FeatureFPARMv8,
FeatureNEON, FeaturePerfMon,
FeatureFullFP16,
FeatureFP16FML, FeatureSHA3];
+ // Apple A14 a
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94332
To avoid generating unnecessary values, we don't create a new value but instead
leave it to the specific analysis to do this if desired.
>From 6c3273f278cc497992e9a7ed7fc7fbec439d6207 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 20
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
To avoid generating unnecessary values, we don't create a new value but instead
leave it to the specific analysis to do this if desired.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94332.diff
2 F
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
To avoid generating unnecessary values, we don't create a new value but instead
leave it to the specific analysis to do this if desired.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94332.d
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> Unfortunately this is still failing one test on the LLDB macOS CI:
> https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/5083/execution/node/97/log
>
> ```
> ==
> FAIL: test_duplicate_decls_g
DavidSpickett wrote:
Maybe you can run individual tests with lit but generally I use `lldb-dotest`
instead:
```
./bin/lldb-dotest.py -p TestTemplateWithSameArg.py
```
(you only need the filename)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92083
___
cfe
GertyP wrote:
@owenca Re. draft status: I thought a draft would be a better way (less
presumptuous, more tentative suggestion) to present one particular solution,
while acknowledging the possibility of alternatives. If that's not really the
way a draft is used or if it's more of a problem (e
DavidSpickett wrote:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94325 will get us past the compiler
error.
Some things I noticed testing that:
* There is an lld installed on the machine but it's in a path with spaces so
lit can't run it. Generally we'd build lld along with lldb and use that in
https://github.com/sdkrystian approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94311
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94243
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nga888 wrote:
> > shouldn't there be a test case added for the dropping of dllexport?
>
> I can't think of a test case that would hit it.
Just for clarification, you want to pursue the `getMostRecentDecl()` approach
but keep the code for the dropping of `dllexport` even though there appears to
JonChesterfield wrote:
@arsenm You're right about passing larger things indirectly. I'm intending to
land this as-is, with the types inlined, as that unblocks #93362. I'm nervous
that the extra pointer indirection will hit the same memory error that tweaking
codegen in that patch hits (it's a
https://github.com/GertyP ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89956
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
Rajveer100 wrote:
Sure, I'll add more.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94159
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -0,0 +1,1037 @@
+//===-- ExpandVariadicsPass.cpp *- C++ -*-=//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
@@ -0,0 +1,1037 @@
+//===-- ExpandVariadicsPass.cpp *- C++ -*-=//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
https://github.com/Rajveer100 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94159
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Matheus Izvekov
Date: 2024-06-04T08:52:17-03:00
New Revision: 924611b0301f751e8c3fef9759b9d2683b0345fc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/924611b0301f751e8c3fef9759b9d2683b0345fc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/924611b0301f751e8c3fef9759b9d2683b0345fc.dif
https://github.com/mizvekov closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94311
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
wangpc-pp wrote:
> This broke building clang on Windows with PGO:
>
> ```
> FAILED: bin/clang-repl.exe lib/clang-repl.lib
> cmd.exe /C "cmd.exe /C "D:\task_171745452431588\fetches\cmake\bin\cmake.exe
> -E __create_def
> D:\task_171745452431588\fetches\llvm-project\build\stage2\build\tools\cla
@@ -0,0 +1,1037 @@
+//===-- ExpandVariadicsPass.cpp *- C++ -*-=//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
wangpc-pp wrote:
This seems to be a breaking change, do we need to create issue in
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/rvv-intrinsic-doc?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94318
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
https://github.com/wangpc-pp approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94318
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,1037 @@
+//===-- ExpandVariadicsPass.cpp *- C++ -*-=//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
Author: Qizhi Hu
Date: 2024-06-04T20:06:15+08:00
New Revision: 3b020d51f1c96980b1813e5148dbbd6af91669cf
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3b020d51f1c96980b1813e5148dbbd6af91669cf
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3b020d51f1c96980b1813e5148dbbd6af91669cf.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/jcsxky closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,1037 @@
+//===-- ExpandVariadicsPass.cpp *- C++ -*-=//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apach
https://github.com/JonChesterfield closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94083
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
JonChesterfield wrote:
Slightly jumped the gun on this patch because Eli just wrote a bunch of useful
things on #93362 and there's therefore a credible chance that rebasing on this
will get the pass in the hands of other people soon, giving libc sprintf and so
forth.
https://github.com/llvm/l
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static_library("IPO") {
"DeadArgumentElimination.cpp",
"ElimAvailExtern.cpp",
"EmbedBitcodePass.cpp",
+"ExpandVariadics.cpp",
JonChesterfield wrote:
Nice, I did not know what. I am indeed not a BUILD.gn user.
https://github.c
https://github.com/JonChesterfield edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94332
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zmodem wrote:
Yes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93302
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
JonChesterfield wrote:
Majority of review comments applied. Merged 94083 (with apologies to Matt) and
rebased.
I claim the top level strategy of "turn ... into va_list then fix up known call
sites" is a reasonable strategy for optimising variadic functions. The target
specific quirks being ab
https://github.com/brunodf-snps created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94346
The `llvm.invariant.start` intrinsic is already overloaded to work with memory
objects in any address space. We simply instantiate the intrinsic with the
appropriate pointer type.
Fixes #94345.
>From ea1a
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Bruno De Fraine (brunodf-snps)
Changes
The `llvm.invariant.start` intrinsic is already overloaded to work with memory
objects in any address space. We simply instantiate the intrinsic with the
appropriate pointer type.
Fixes #94345.
---
https://github.com/AaronBallman unassigned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94347
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman unassigned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94347
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman unassigned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94347
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman unassigned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94347
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Aaron Ballman (AaronBallman)
Changes
Before C++23, we would check a constexpr function body to diagnose if the
function can never be evaluated in a constant expression context. This was
previously required standards behavior, but C++23 re
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94349
We see some tests are failing internally after
12949c952c4fbad776a860c003ccf176973278a0.
In CAS systems, we might not see the exact binary name (clang), this patch
removes the binary name in the FileCheck conten
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Haojian Wu (hokein)
Changes
We see some tests are failing internally after
12949c952c4fbad776a860c003ccf176973278a0.
In CAS systems, we might not see the exact binary name (clang), this patch
removes the
@@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ void undefined(uint32x2_t v2i32, uint32x4_t v4i32, uint16x8_t
v8i16, uint8x16_t
vrnd_f16(v4f16); // expected-error {{always_inline function 'vrnd_f16'
requires target feature 'fullfp16'}}
vmaxnm_f16(v4f16, v4f16); // expected-error {{always_inline functio
https://github.com/hokein updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94349
>From fa0880d477439e4af3f0b1b057dc1c66a2ccbc1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:51:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [Driver] Make the FileCheck less strict for some tests.
We see some t
kawashima-fj wrote:
@DanielKristofKiss Thanks for the fix. At first glance, LGTM. I'll take a
closer look in a few days.
I'm not so familiar with the code. If someone else can review, I'll leave it to
them.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94271
___
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 373 matches
Mail list logo
