================
@@ -286,7 +286,6 @@ void AArch64TargetInfo::getTargetDefinesARMV84A(const
LangOptions &Opts,
void AArch64TargetInfo::getTargetDefinesARMV85A(const LangOptions &Opts,
MacroBuilder &Builder) const {
Builder.defineMacro("__ARM_FEATURE_FRINT", "1");
- Builder.defineMacro("__ARM_FEATURE_BTI", "1");
----------------
tmatheson-arm wrote:
Generally speaking, we should gate things by specific feature rather than
architecture, so I think this change is correct regardless of what we do with
these specific chips.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92600
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
