smanna12 wrote:
> I believe the static analyzer is reporting a false positive in this case. I
> don't think this change is correct. `BuildClassMessage()` only dereferences
> `receiverTypeInfo` if the provided source location is not valid. The existing
> `assert` already validates this case. Th
@@ -0,0 +1,799 @@
+==
+DXIL Resource Handling
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+.. toctree::
+ :hidden:
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Resources in DXIL are represented via ``TargetExtType`` in LLVM IR and
+eventually lowered by the Di
https://github.com/Sirraide approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,799 @@
+==
+DXIL Resource Handling
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+.. toctree::
+ :hidden:
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Resources in DXIL are represented via ``TargetExtType`` in LLVM IR and
+eventually lowered by the Di
@@ -0,0 +1,799 @@
+==
+DXIL Resource Handling
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+.. toctree::
+ :hidden:
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Resources in DXIL are represented via ``TargetExtType`` in LLVM IR and
+eventually lowered by the Di
@@ -0,0 +1,799 @@
+==
+DXIL Resource Handling
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+.. toctree::
+ :hidden:
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Resources in DXIL are represented via ``TargetExtType`` in LLVM IR and
+eventually lowered by the Di
@@ -0,0 +1,799 @@
+==
+DXIL Resource Handling
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+.. toctree::
+ :hidden:
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Resources in DXIL are represented via ``TargetExtType`` in LLVM IR and
+eventually lowered by the Di
@@ -0,0 +1,799 @@
+==
+DXIL Resource Handling
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+.. toctree::
+ :hidden:
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Resources in DXIL are represented via ``TargetExtType`` in LLVM IR and
+eventually lowered by the Di
@@ -0,0 +1,799 @@
+==
+DXIL Resource Handling
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+.. toctree::
+ :hidden:
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Resources in DXIL are represented via ``TargetExtType`` in LLVM IR and
+eventually lowered by the Di
@@ -0,0 +1,799 @@
+==
+DXIL Resource Handling
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+.. toctree::
+ :hidden:
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Resources in DXIL are represented via ``TargetExtType`` in LLVM IR and
+eventually lowered by the Di
Author: Heejin Ahn
Date: 2024-04-30T11:15:53-07:00
New Revision: 7662f95f2c767ae3c9b22eb4bdedb07ffcf258b7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7662f95f2c767ae3c9b22eb4bdedb07ffcf258b7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7662f95f2c767ae3c9b22eb4bdedb07ffcf258b7.diff
LO
https://github.com/aheejin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90528
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -67,6 +68,69 @@ void B::g() requires true;
} // namespace cwg2847
+namespace cwg2851 { // cwg2851: 19
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+template struct Val { static constexpr T value = v; };
+
+
+// Floating-point promotions
+
+static_assert(Val::value == 0.0L);
+static_asser
Author: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: 2024-04-30T14:23:02-04:00
New Revision: f061a395ffb78215a23e0f503e8ea121ee3b13ad
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f061a395ffb78215a23e0f503e8ea121ee3b13ad
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f061a395ffb78215a23e0f503e8ea121ee3b13ad
https://github.com/sdkrystian closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90517
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sdkrystian closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90152
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: 2024-04-30T14:25:09-04:00
New Revision: 8009bbec59d1c5d47ae06c431647ebee6d886ff2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8009bbec59d1c5d47ae06c431647ebee6d886ff2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8009bbec59d1c5d47ae06c431647ebee6d886ff2
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// UNSUPPORTED: system-windows
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+// RUN: cd %t
+//
+// RUN: cp a1.h a.h
+// RUN: %clang -fmodules -fmodules-validate-input-files-content -Xclang
-fno-pch-timestamp -fimplicit-modules -fmodule-map-file=module.modulemap
sdkrystian wrote:
I built boost with `-DBUILD_TESTING=ON` and didn't see any regressions...
hopefully that remains the case
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90152
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/
Author: Erich Keane
Date: 2024-04-30T11:28:37-07:00
New Revision: fa67986d5b309ddd4c2ea74e8a5eeb0559aa8022
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fa67986d5b309ddd4c2ea74e8a5eeb0559aa8022
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fa67986d5b309ddd4c2ea74e8a5eeb0559aa8022.diff
L
https://github.com/erichkeane closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90521
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jcsxky created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90646
attempt to fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/90349
Skip to add outer class template arguments to `MTAL` when the friend function
has the same depth with its lexical context(`CXXRecordDecl`).
>From e
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Qizhi Hu (jcsxky)
Changes
attempt to fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/90349
Skip to add outer class template arguments to `MTAL` when the friend function
has the same depth with its lexical context(`CXXRecordDecl`).
---
Ful
https://github.com/ivanmurashko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90319
>From 3c36295b5f0f1e011e11d57c5ec4e685cb917cab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Murashko
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 22:45:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Modules] Process include files changes with
-fmodules-vali
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// UNSUPPORTED: system-windows
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+// RUN: cd %t
+//
+// RUN: cp a1.h a.h
+// RUN: %clang -fmodules -fmodules-validate-input-files-content -Xclang
-fno-pch-timestamp -fimplicit-modules -fmodule-map-file=module.modulemap
https://github.com/benlangmuir approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90319
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ivanmurashko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90319
>From 71796a80e15b6700fec23fbec70635aae455b188 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Murashko
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 22:45:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Modules] Process include files changes with
-fmodules-vali
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2024-04-30T11:53:57-07:00
New Revision: 41f9c78f6a4efe38edbb0b62131b0a0bf619c99a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/41f9c78f6a4efe38edbb0b62131b0a0bf619c99a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/41f9c78f6a4efe38edbb0b62131b0a0bf619c99a.diff
LO
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90555
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hiraditya wrote:
I believe this is breaking the buildbot
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/245/builds/23936 please confirm.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90152
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
https://github.com/efriedma-quic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90547
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1144,11 +1167,13 @@ bool MicrosoftCXXABI::classifyReturnType(CGFunctionInfo
&FI) const {
if (!RD)
return false;
- bool isTrivialForABI = RD->canPassInRegisters() &&
- isTrivialForMSVC(RD, FI.getReturnType(), CGM);
-
// MSVC always returns
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
Maybe we should just be testing if the copy-assignment operator is deleted?
For reference, MSVC also returns the following indirectly:
```
struct Test
{
int x;
Test& operator=(const Test&) = delete;
};
Test foo();
Test test(Test x)
{
return
sdkrystian wrote:
@erichkeane pushed a commit which fixes it
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90152
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/JOE1994 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90625
>From 3b2f810ff3798ef073a8d1a10ca6fbafdbdb4641 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Youngsuk Kim
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:18:15 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][Sema] Re-use existing BinaryOperator if possible
First ro
https://github.com/lamb-j updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85672
>From aff1a762a73ce30cde38a6fcbbed8a3e4f0b5366 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Lambert
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:19:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][CodeGen] Omit pre-opt link when post-opt link
request
andykaylor wrote:
ping for review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89473
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zahiraam wrote:
LGTM! Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89473
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jcranmer-intel approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89473
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -413,8 +413,9 @@ static bool format(StringRef FileName, bool
ErrorOnIncompleteFormat = false) {
// On Windows, overwriting a file with an open file mapping doesn't work,
// so read the whole file into memory when formatting in-place.
ErrorOr> CodeOrErr =
- !Outpu
perry-ca wrote:
> We don't normally commit in clang-format with a unit test
I assume you mean "without a unit test". In this case the unit test is the
existing test cases. Some fail on z/OS because the files are not read in as
text. It's not really possible to detect this issue on other pla
@@ -4675,8 +4709,10 @@ bool Parser::ParseOpenMPVarList(OpenMPDirectiveKind
DKind,
// Only parse map-type-modifier[s] and map-type if a colon is present in
// the map clause.
if (ColonPresent) {
+ if (getLangOpts().OpenMP >= 60 && getCurToken().is(tok::colon))
@@ -908,6 +908,74 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitIfStmt(const IfStmt &S) {
incrementProfileCounter(&S);
}
+bool CodeGenFunction::checkIfLoopMustProgress(const Expr
*ControllingExpression,
+ bool IsTrivialCXXLoop) {
+ if (CGM.get
https://github.com/hekota updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89809
>From 22b67d30ca087d6a912183039c87fd1790eedfe4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Helena Kotas
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:49:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add environment parameter to clang availability attribute
---
@@ -654,6 +655,7 @@ X86TargetLowering::X86TargetLowering(const X86TargetMachine
&TM,
setOperationAction(ISD::FSIN , VT, Expand);
setOperationAction(ISD::FCOS , VT, Expand);
setOperationAction(ISD::FSINCOS, VT, Expand);
+ setOperationAction(ISD::FTAN,
@@ -4675,8 +4709,10 @@ bool Parser::ParseOpenMPVarList(OpenMPDirectiveKind
DKind,
// Only parse map-type-modifier[s] and map-type if a colon is present in
// the map clause.
if (ColonPresent) {
+ if (getLangOpts().OpenMP >= 60 && getCurToken().is(tok::colon))
@@ -4675,8 +4709,10 @@ bool Parser::ParseOpenMPVarList(OpenMPDirectiveKind
DKind,
// Only parse map-type-modifier[s] and map-type if a colon is present in
// the map clause.
if (ColonPresent) {
+ if (getLangOpts().OpenMP >= 60 && getCurToken().is(tok::colon))
@@ -0,0 +1,794 @@
+==
+DXIL Resource Handling
+==
+
+.. contents::
+ :local:
+
+.. toctree::
+ :hidden:
+
+Introduction
+
+
+Resources in DXIL are represented via ``TargetExtType`` in LLVM IR and
+eventually lowered by the Di
https://github.com/alexey-bataev approved this pull request.
LG
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90499
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bharadwajy approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90277
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88963
>From 77de225477afd3689b8bf64107e8f3a4eeab85ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:36:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][Sema] Improve support for explicit
speciali
sdkrystian wrote:
I'm actually working on constraint checking for function template
specializations in #88963. I don't think this patch is quite right... this will
cause a crash if the befriended function is a member of a class template
specialization. Relative to the changes in #88963, I beli
jyu2-git wrote:
> LG
Thanks Alexey!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90499
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87596
>From 03266b74d973075eb5dfa27f32bb9c1bb75d73f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:46:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [BoundsSafety] Allow 'counted_by' attribute on pointers
in stru
https://github.com/higher-performance updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90634
>From 013b692fbd8ec3aab4913b65582e11c5be566c77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: higher-performance
<113926381+higher-performa...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:40:59 -0600
Subject: [
higher-performance wrote:
Hi, is this a new requirement? I don't wish to commit my personal information
here. What are my options?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
perry-ca wrote:
ping @MaskRay. Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89854
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cyndyishida created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90664
Add validation in the FileList reader to check that the headers exist and use
similar diagnostics in Options.cpp
>From 42ad6921fdf179647f6529ddeb7d060e93e0f52f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Da
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Cyndy Ishida (cyndyishida)
Changes
Add validation in the FileList reader to check that the headers exist and use
similar diagnostics in Options.cpp
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90664.diff
4 Files Affected:
-
Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2024-04-30T23:05:47+02:00
New Revision: 699243343439285ec2fe61b4ae568c7a958c7ce2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/699243343439285ec2fe61b4ae568c7a958c7ce2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/699243343439285ec2fe61b4ae568c7a958c7ce2.diff
LOG:
Author: Wei Wang
Date: 2024-04-30T14:31:31-07:00
New Revision: 0232b77e145577ab78e3ed1fdbb7eacc5a7381ab
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0232b77e145577ab78e3ed1fdbb7eacc5a7381ab
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0232b77e145577ab78e3ed1fdbb7eacc5a7381ab.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/apolloww closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90549
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Andy Kaylor
Date: 2024-04-30T14:43:45-07:00
New Revision: fb85a282d125a2805632285b29686392e6922b66
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fb85a282d125a2805632285b29686392e6922b66
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fb85a282d125a2805632285b29686392e6922b66.diff
L
https://github.com/andykaylor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89473
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/apolloww created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90672
Previous fix #90549 didn't completely address the Buildbot failures. Some
target may not recognize the target triple. This time, only run the test under
x86_64-linux.
>From 66d63598d0c29cc7232715d0abfcfcc640dc
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Wei Wang (apolloww)
Changes
Previous fix #90549 didn't completely address the Buildbot failures.
Some target may not recognize the target triple. This time, only run the test
under x86_64-linux.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llv
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-coroutines
Author: Wei Wang (apolloww)
Changes
Previous fix #90549 didn't completely address the Buildbot failures.
Some target may not recognize the target triple. This time, only run the test
under x86_64-linux.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llv
apolloww wrote:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/188/builds/45187
```
Error running ThinLTO backend: No available targets are compatible with triple
"x86_64-unknown-linux"
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90672
___
cfe-commits m
@@ -908,6 +908,74 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitIfStmt(const IfStmt &S) {
incrementProfileCounter(&S);
}
+bool CodeGenFunction::checkIfLoopMustProgress(const Expr
*ControllingExpression,
+ bool IsTrivialCXXLoop) {
+ if (CGM.get
@@ -1787,7 +1787,26 @@ Value *ScalarExprEmitter::VisitMemberExpr(MemberExpr *E)
{
}
}
- return EmitLoadOfLValue(E);
+ llvm::Value *Result = EmitLoadOfLValue(E);
+
+ // If -fdebug_info_for_profiling is specified, emit a pseudo variable and its
huangjd
@@ -5636,6 +5636,84 @@ void
CGDebugInfo::EmitExternalVariable(llvm::GlobalVariable *Var,
Var->addDebugInfo(GVE);
}
+void CGDebugInfo::EmitPseudoVariable(CGBuilderTy &Builder,
+ llvm::Instruction *Value, QualType Ty) {
+ // Only when -g2
@@ -5636,6 +5636,84 @@ void
CGDebugInfo::EmitExternalVariable(llvm::GlobalVariable *Var,
Var->addDebugInfo(GVE);
}
+void CGDebugInfo::EmitPseudoVariable(CGBuilderTy &Builder,
+ llvm::Instruction *Value, QualType Ty) {
+ // Only when -g2
https://github.com/ian-twilightcoder created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90676
stdarg.h and especially stddef.h are textual and so everything they declare
gets precompiled into all of their clients' pcm files. They shouldn't directly
declare anything though, their purpose is to s
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ian Anderson (ian-twilightcoder)
Changes
stdarg.h and especially stddef.h are textual and so everything they declare
gets precompiled into all of their clients' pcm files. They shouldn't directly
declare anything though, their purpose is
MaskRay wrote:
Clang configuration files
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#configuration-files cover your use
case and the feature is exactly designed to avoid such cmake default configs.
https://blogs.gentoo.org/mgorny/2022/10/07/clang-in-gentoo-now-sets-default-runtimes-via-config
sbc100 wrote:
This change seems to causing the auto-roller for emscripten to fail due to a
crash in LTO. See
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/emscripten-releases/builders/luci.emscripten-releases.ci/linux-test-suites
```
PromoteIntegerOperand Op #3: t22: i32,ch = llvm.coro.subfn.addr t26,
Target
sbc100 wrote:
The function being compiled in the crash looks like this one:
https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/blob/56547157a37e25fb31f9193461a2c88bdaa44385/system/lib/embind/bind.cpp#L66-L68
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90310
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87596
>From 03266b74d973075eb5dfa27f32bb9c1bb75d73f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:46:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [BoundsSafety] Allow 'counted_by' attribute on pointers
in stru
https://github.com/ian-twilightcoder updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90676
>From 8d8756f00297e90e0b1125d2a78d3f41c9aae6a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Anderson
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:16:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][modules] stdarg.h and stddef.h shouldn't directl
https://github.com/ian-twilightcoder updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90676
>From 052dfeb8d94971dadfa65147f79d5fa37910b0e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Anderson
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:16:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][modules] stdarg.h and stddef.h shouldn't directl
apolloww wrote:
hmm, this looks like `llvm.coro.subfn.addr` is not lowered before codegen
starts. And this is for wasm and MonoLTO. Let me check.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
jcsxky wrote:
> I'm actually working on constraint checking for function template
> specializations in #88963. I don't think this patch is quite right... this
> will cause a crash if the befriended function is a member of a class template
> specialization. Relative to the changes in #88963, I
Author: Cyndy Ishida
Date: 2024-04-30T16:10:20-07:00
New Revision: 278774e428c280b6ab62c147ac33b6837dad6dd5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/278774e428c280b6ab62c147ac33b6837dad6dd5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/278774e428c280b6ab62c147ac33b6837dad6dd5.diff
https://github.com/cyndyishida closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90664
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cyndyishida created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90686
Projects like libc use mutually exclusive macros to compile files multiple
times and then merge the result into the final library. For installapi to
accept these, we'd need to parse the same declarations in
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Cyndy Ishida (cyndyishida)
Changes
Projects like libc use mutually exclusive macros to compile files multiple
times and then merge the result into the final library. For installapi to
accept these, we'd need to parse the same declarations
apolloww wrote:
OK, so Mono LTO backend pipeline does not have any coro passes. We can add
coroutine passes to `buildLTODefaultPipeline`, but I am not sure how big the
use case it is. For now, I'll limit the tuning to ThinLTO only. Will send an
update soon.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-projec
https://github.com/apolloww created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90690
Follow up to #90310, limit the tune up only to ThinLTO pre-link as coroutine
passes are not in MonoLTO backend
Also coro-elide-thinlto test is still failing on some Buildbots, only run the
test under x86_64 li
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-coroutines
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Wei Wang (apolloww)
Changes
Follow up to #90310, limit the tune up only to ThinLTO pre-link as
coroutine passes are not in MonoLTO backend
Also coro-elide-thinlto test is still failing on some Buildbots, on
MaxEW707 wrote:
> Maybe we should just be testing if the copy-assignment operator is deleted?
> For reference, MSVC also returns the following indirectly:
>
> ```
> struct Test
> {
> int x;
> Test& operator=(const Test&) = delete;
> };
> Test foo();
> Test test(Test x)
> {
> return x;
https://github.com/sbc100 approved this pull request.
I'm not very familiar with this code, but it looks reasonable on the surface.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90690
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
https://github.com/ahatanak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79230
>From 95200f3bb3859738981240a9d8c503a13ede9601 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Hatanaka
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 13:18:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] Add support for builtin_verbose_trap
The builtin causes
ahatanak wrote:
We could use the function name without the prefix as the key when searching for
the subprogram in `CGDebugInfo::createInlinedTrapSubprogram`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79230
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@list
dyung wrote:
This test has been failing on bots for several hours now. Can we either get
this fix in or the original change reverted to get the bots back to green? One
failing bot is https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/280/builds/2876.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90672
_
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89638
>From aafa018b3d7657483738fa91812e3e8bbdd8205a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:55:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Triple::normalize: Use none as OS for XX-none-ABI
When we pars
wzssyqa wrote:
@peterwaller-arm half-done. Do *NOT* merge it now. It has still some problem.
See `clang/test/Driver/baremetal-multilib.yaml`.
There is still some `none-unknown`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89638
___
cfe-commits mailing l
apolloww wrote:
> This test has been failing on bots for several hours now. Can we either get
> this fix in or the original change reverted to get the bots back to green?
> One failing bot is https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/280/builds/2876.
sorry for the breakage, the same fix is incl
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89638
>From aafa018b3d7657483738fa91812e3e8bbdd8205a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:55:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Triple::normalize: Use none as OS for XX-none-ABI
When we pars
wzssyqa wrote:
@peterwaller-arm It seems OK now. Let's wait the result of CI.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Wei Wang
Date: 2024-04-30T18:08:40-07:00
New Revision: b1b1bfa7bea0ce489b5ea9134e17a43c695df5ec
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b1b1bfa7bea0ce489b5ea9134e17a43c695df5ec
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b1b1bfa7bea0ce489b5ea9134e17a43c695df5ec.diff
LOG:
301 - 400 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
