MaxEW707 wrote:
> Maybe we should just be testing if the copy-assignment operator is deleted?
> For reference, MSVC also returns the following indirectly:
>
> ```
> struct Test
> {
> int x;
> Test& operator=(const Test&) = delete;
> };
> Test foo();
> Test test(Test x)
> {
> return x;
> }
> ```
Argh, I didn't even consider trying an explicitly deleted copy assignment
operator.
That should have been obvious considering the copy assignment operator is
implicitly delete since we have a non-static data member of a reference type.
I'll give this a try.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90547
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
