Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-04-19T09:06:13+02:00
New Revision: ca7d9442baf638f020c9594dc2af388d24c4a3e1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ca7d9442baf638f020c9594dc2af388d24c4a3e1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ca7d9442baf638f020c9594dc2af388d24c4a3e1.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89235
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89213
>From d4205b37d9ba3cecd7cd947a188ec84e9afec899 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:50:40 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][dataflow] Model conditional operator correctly.
mahtohappy wrote:
Check is for dependent types and earlier I was not checking that with the
condition being only
```if (ArraySize)``` so normal arrays with new initializer also were passing
the check.
Now added the dependent type check as well
```if (ArraySize && E->isTypeDependent())```
https
@@ -657,17 +658,25 @@ class TransferVisitor : public
ConstStmtVisitor {
}
void VisitConditionalOperator(const ConditionalOperator *S) {
-// FIXME: Revisit this once flow conditions are added to the framework. For
-// `a = b ? c : d` we can add `b => a == c && !b =
https://github.com/dtcxzyw edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89294
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dtcxzyw requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89294
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY InstCombinerImpl final
Value *foldAndOrOfICmpsOfAndWithPow2(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS,
Instruction *CxtI, bool IsAnd,
bool IsLogical = false);
-
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89247
From 7138f026e845ebb4f1a3e6a86bdeb534d666ae7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:40:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] Move StreamChecker ou
https://github.com/martinboehme updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89052
>From a705853deb0cfa6596245c929e9b86ea2d2a7c26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:31:12 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][nullability] Remove `RecordValue`.
This class no l
Author: Chen Zheng
Date: 2024-04-19T03:39:17-04:00
New Revision: b2323f43e3cdb52b4e15a7d4f434cd5c64740dd4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b2323f43e3cdb52b4e15a7d4f434cd5c64740dd4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b2323f43e3cdb52b4e15a7d4f434cd5c64740dd4.diff
LO
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89052
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-04-19T09:39:52+02:00
New Revision: e8fce95887ecfd87a83db8dbb0cc55966b004d6f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e8fce95887ecfd87a83db8dbb0cc55966b004d6f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e8fce95887ecfd87a83db8dbb0cc55966b004d6f.diff
@@ -657,17 +658,22 @@ class TransferVisitor : public
ConstStmtVisitor {
}
void VisitConditionalOperator(const ConditionalOperator *S) {
-// FIXME: Revisit this once flow conditions are added to the framework. For
-// `a = b ? c : d` we can add `b => a == c && !b =
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89213
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89213
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aniplcc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89202
>From 650a14ed69d1296d3674e58cf66364ca6fa21932 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: aniplcc
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:38:55 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [clang]MveEmitter:Update args with const references
---
clang/utils/T
https://github.com/vgvassilev updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89031
>From e5aae5f7b945f1f6da58453f03dafdb86c90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:51:17 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-repl] Keep the first llvm::Module empty to avoid
inv
https://github.com/vgvassilev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vgvassilev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vgvassilev wrote:
After an offline discussion with @lhames, we have a more simplified approach
which should consume less memory. Now we just keep the first llvm::Module empty
and make sure it's used only for read-only purposes such as computing the
llvm::DataLayout out of it in CodeGen.
https
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89352
For some reason, when I merged #89235, two lines were mis-formatted.
This patch corrects this; while I'm here, I'm also correcting other
existing formatting errors.
>From 483a737432dc0e063addb9b15cf8853dab
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
For some reason, when I merged #89235, two lines were mis-formatted.
This patch corrects this; while I'm here, I'm also correcting other
existing formatting errors.
---
Full
martinboehme wrote:
Merging without review as this is a trivial, formatting-only change that was
auto-generated by clang-format, and I'd like to expeditiously fix the
formatting error I made in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89235.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89352
___
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY InstCombinerImpl final
Value *foldAndOrOfICmpsOfAndWithPow2(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS,
Instruction *CxtI, bool IsAnd,
bool IsLogical = false);
-
https://github.com/joker-eph edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89294
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89247
From 7138f026e845ebb4f1a3e6a86bdeb534d666ae7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:40:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][analyzer] Move StreamChecker ou
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-04-19T10:12:57+02:00
New Revision: 14122106320b88f114301bbf8694ceac9bb7a27a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/14122106320b88f114301bbf8694ceac9bb7a27a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/14122106320b88f114301bbf8694ceac9bb7a27a.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89352
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nikic wrote:
Isn't the warning about a mismatch between declaration and definition, not call
args? The InstCombine change does make the definition and declaration match.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024, at 17:07, Mehdi Amini wrote:
>
>
> ***@***. commented on this pull request.
>
>
> In llvm/lib/T
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Brandon Wu (4vtomat)
Changes
It follows the interface defined here:
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/rvv-intrinsic-doc/pull/293
---
Patch is 4.84 MiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https
dtcxzyw wrote:
> Isn't the warning about a mismatch between declaration and definition, not
> call args? The InstCombine change does make the definition and declaration
> match.
> […](#)
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024, at 17:07, Mehdi Amini wrote: ***@***. commented on
> this pull request. In llvm
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-04-19T16:24:47+08:00
New Revision: aac695da42cf48ccb29c2fe495ead564cc913471
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aac695da42cf48ccb29c2fe495ead564cc913471
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aac695da42cf48ccb29c2fe495ead564cc913471.diff
LO
https://github.com/Trass3r updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87626
>From 153bb2fd38b8bb18281bd52c2a21b6e4a75f3fc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Hollandt
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 12:05:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] demangle OptFunction trace names
This improves consistency
kito-cheng wrote:
vfncvtbf16.c, vfwcvtbf16.c and vfwmaccbf16.c already in the LLVM repo, so I
think those files could removed from this PR?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89354
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:/
4vtomat wrote:
Oh, I forgot to remove them. Or do you think they should be moved to bfloat
folder to make them consistent?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89354
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
https://github.com/budimirarandjelovicsyrmia updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70024
From 79873c374c982eed00c3adbc91b5cbff91c5946b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: budimirarandjelovicsyrmia
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:20:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Catch missing format attribut
steakhal wrote:
`StaticAnalyzer` changes LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89294
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/guillem-bartina-sonarsource edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2358,11 +2358,12 @@ StoreRef RegionStoreManager::killBinding(Store ST, Loc
L) {
RegionBindingsRef
RegionStoreManager::bind(RegionBindingsConstRef B, Loc L, SVal V) {
- if (L.getAs())
+ // We only care about region locations.
+ auto MemRegVal = L.getAs();
+ if (!MemReg
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89265
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
LGTM nice quickfix :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89265
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2443,27 +2443,29 @@ usual build cycle when using sample profilers for
optimization:
usual build flags that you always build your application with. The only
requirement is that DWARF debug info including source line information is
generated. This DWARF information
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89358
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85192
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/84492
This patch implements the "IsDeducible" constraint where the template arguments
of the alias templat
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Haojian Wu (hokein)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85192
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/84492
This patch implements the "IsDeducible" constraint where the template arguments
of the alias templ
https://github.com/Khao7342 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89359
This pull request adds definitions for the XiangShan-KunMingHu processor.
"XiangShan" is a high-performance open-source RISC-V processor project, and
"KunMingHu" architecture is its third generation. Official d
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: None (Khao7342)
Changes
This pull request adds definitions for the XiangShan-KunMingHu processor.
"XiangShan" is a high-performance open-source RISC-V processor project, and
"KunMingHu" architecture is its third generation. Offic
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: None (Khao7342)
Changes
This pull request adds definitions for the XiangShan-KunMingHu processor.
"XiangShan" is a high-performance open-source RISC-V processor project, and
"KunMingHu" architecture is its third generation. Officia
hokein wrote:
Regarding the __is_deducible type trait, GCC also provides one, but it was
hidden from users and only used for internal CTAD implementation. I'm not sure
if we should follow the same strategy in clang, ideas?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89358
__
wangpc-pp wrote:
Has KunMingHu's RTl been finalized (IIRC, we have developing vector unit)? And
can we have different doc for different generations of XiangShan?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89359
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@
https://github.com/Krishna-13-cyber created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89362
Addresses #53079
>From 4e649d105a2af038e6dbd0e93b457eebea2e543a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krishna-13-cyber
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:09:26 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Add optimised LLVM IR for atomic i
https://github.com/Krishna-13-cyber converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Krishna Narayanan (Krishna-13-cyber)
Changes
Addresses #53079
---
Patch is 48.64 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89362.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/C
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -910,8 +910,8 @@ Unix Alpha Checkers
-
-alpha.unix.Stream
+
+unix.Stream
NagyDonat wrote:
Remove it from this file entirely.
In fact, I strongly suspect that the entire HTML d
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?= ,
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Open Projects
(Difficulty: Medium)
- alpha.unix.StreamChecker
+ unix.StreamChecker
NagyDonat wrote:
Yes, remove it from
https://github.com/NorthBlue333 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77456
>From 6c184f9714c94af94c7692e1264061b8dc14e912 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NorthBlue333
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 14:01:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Do not update cursor pos if no includes
replac
NorthBlue333 wrote:
Sure, that was was not very clear from my side I agree.
Yes, your implementation is cleaner (I don't know why I did not do that from
the beginning, I think I was struggling to fix the other tests and ended up
with something more complicated than necessary).
I have squashed
sdkrystian wrote:
@mikaelholmen I believe there are two uses of
`exclude_from_explicit_instantiation` in libc++ which are responsible for all
these warnings. I was assuming that someone more experienced with the libc++
side of things would handle it, but I can submit a patch that addresses the
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89370
The argument types are not modeled as children of TypeTraitExpr, therefore they
are not dumped with the default implementation.
Dumping them is really useful for ad-hoc debugging, context #89358
>From e8a9fcfa4
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Haojian Wu (hokein)
Changes
The argument types are not modeled as children of TypeTraitExpr, therefore they
are not dumped with the default implementation.
Dumping them is really useful for ad-hoc debugging, context #89358
---
Full diff
mikaelholmen wrote:
Nice! I have no idea about this I just saw the warnings when I compiled and
connected them to this patch.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.or
https://github.com/sebastianpoeplau updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72400
>From dd0f87b25733b4569b89ce445630ee843e3bfb2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthieu Eyraud
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:53:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [libclang] Compute the right spelling location
Locati
sebastianpoeplau wrote:
Thanks for the review @jansvoboda11; I've added an entry in the release notes
and a unit test.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72400
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
Author: NagyDonat
Date: 2024-04-19T14:22:51+02:00
New Revision: e2f1cbae45f81f3cd9a4d3c2bcf69a094eb060fa
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e2f1cbae45f81f3cd9a4d3c2bcf69a094eb060fa
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e2f1cbae45f81f3cd9a4d3c2bcf69a094eb060fa.diff
LOG
https://github.com/NagyDonat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88879
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sdkrystian wrote:
@mikaelholmen See #89377
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89378
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/89013
When building the deduction guide, we use the TemplateArgsForBuildingFPrime to
transform the require-clause from the underlying class deduction guide.
Howe
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Haojian Wu (hokein)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/89013
When building the deduction guide, we use the TemplateArgsForBuildingFPrime to
transform the require-clause from the underlying class deduction guide.
Ho
AaronBallman wrote:
> > @tbaederr -- this triggers an assertion with the new constexpr interpreter
> > in `clang/test/AST/Interp/intap.cpp` but I'm not certain I understand why.
> > Can you help me figure out how to fix that?
> > https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/github-pull-requests/builds/56
https://github.com/luporl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88932
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mydeveloperday wrote:
Do you think we should push this into the 18 branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89016
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@ struct LangStandard {
/// hasDigraphs - Language supports digraphs.
bool hasDigraphs() const { return Flags & Digraphs; }
+ /// hasRawStringLiterals - Language supports R"()" raw string literals.
+ bool hasRawStringLiterals() const {
+// GCC supp
Author: Chen Zheng
Date: 2024-04-19T08:52:28-04:00
New Revision: aa39b0b13e3b56ac072acff2660dbef9db45bca0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aa39b0b13e3b56ac072acff2660dbef9db45bca0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aa39b0b13e3b56ac072acff2660dbef9db45bca0.diff
LO
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
Where is the repro from the original author? What did they share, and what
ended up being the solution/test here for it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89036
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89036
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -12864,6 +12864,19 @@ TreeTransform::TransformCXXNewExpr(CXXNewExpr
*E) {
ArraySize = NewArraySize.get();
}
+ // Per C++0x [expr.new]p5, the type being constructed may be a
+ // typedef of an array type.
+ QualType AllocType = AllocTypeInfo->getType();
+ if (Arra
https://github.com/Sirraide edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89254
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c23 %s
+
+// GH87641 noticed that integer promotion of a bit-field of bit-precise integer
+// type was promoting to int rather than the type of the bit-field.
+struct S {
+ unsigned _BitInt(7) x : 2;
+ unsigned _Bit
https://github.com/Sirraide approved this pull request.
Just one comment but LGTM otherwise.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89254
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
It seems to me that exposing these as children is the better option here,
right? That way it would better model a CallExpr or template type-trait, and
would work in our StmtProfiler et-al.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89370
___
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
Needs a release note, and I think we actually DO have to do those diagnostics
here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89358
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.o
@@ -6100,6 +6100,17 @@ static bool EvaluateBinaryTypeTrait(Sema &Self,
TypeTrait BTT, const TypeSourceI
tok::kw___is_pointer_interconvertible_base_of);
return Self.IsPointerInterconvertibleBaseOf(Lhs, Rhs);
+ }
+ case BTT_IsDeducible: {
+
@@ -3207,6 +3241,59 @@
Sema::DeduceTemplateArguments(VarTemplatePartialSpecializationDecl *Partial,
return ::DeduceTemplateArguments(*this, Partial, TemplateArgs, Info);
}
+TemplateDeductionResult
+Sema::DeduceTemplateArgumentsFromType(TemplateDecl *TD, QualType FromType,
+
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89358
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89378
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89254
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
This change looks right to me! I don't know if there is value in a
signed-test instead of unsigned, but a couple more tests might be nice anyway.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89254
_
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c23 %s
+
+// GH87641 noticed that integer promotion of a bit-field of bit-precise integer
+// type was promoting to int rather than the type of the bit-field.
+struct S {
+ unsigned _BitInt(7) x : 2;
+ unsigned _Bit
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c23 %s
+
+// GH87641 noticed that integer promotion of a bit-field of bit-precise integer
+// type was promoting to int rather than the type of the bit-field.
+struct S {
+ unsigned _BitInt(7) x : 2;
+ unsigned _Bit
zibi2 wrote:
@kadircet FYI, I noticed our Linux on Power down stream build failues related
to this change. The upstream builds are also faling see
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/57/builds/34415 for example.
```
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: llvm::Triple::getArchName() const
>>> re
@@ -12864,6 +12864,19 @@ TreeTransform::TransformCXXNewExpr(CXXNewExpr
*E) {
ArraySize = NewArraySize.get();
}
+ // Per C++0x [expr.new]p5, the type being constructed may be a
+ // typedef of an array type.
+ QualType AllocType = AllocTypeInfo->getType();
+ if (Arra
@@ -12864,6 +12864,19 @@ TreeTransform::TransformCXXNewExpr(CXXNewExpr
*E) {
ArraySize = NewArraySize.get();
}
+ // Per C++0x [expr.new]p5, the type being constructed may be a
+ // typedef of an array type.
+ QualType AllocType = AllocTypeInfo->getType();
+ if (Arra
tstellar wrote:
@owenca Is there a PR for the cherry-pick ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87953
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2358,11 +2358,12 @@ StoreRef RegionStoreManager::killBinding(Store ST, Loc
L) {
RegionBindingsRef
RegionStoreManager::bind(RegionBindingsConstRef B, Loc L, SVal V) {
- if (L.getAs())
+ // We only care about region locations.
+ auto MemRegVal = L.getAs();
+ if (!MemReg
https://github.com/steakhal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89265
>From 50964bf4f694ae21c2ba86b648b241b335e5d6e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Balazs Benics
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:36:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer] Fix stores through label locations
Interestingly
https://github.com/steakhal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89265
>From 50964bf4f694ae21c2ba86b648b241b335e5d6e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Balazs Benics
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:36:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer] Fix stores through label locations
Interestingly
@@ -12864,6 +12864,19 @@ TreeTransform::TransformCXXNewExpr(CXXNewExpr
*E) {
ArraySize = NewArraySize.get();
}
+ // Per C++0x [expr.new]p5, the type being constructed may be a
+ // typedef of an array type.
+ QualType AllocType = AllocTypeInfo->getType();
+ if (Arra
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+// RUN: %clang --target=x86_64-pc-linux -S -fno-discard-value-names -emit-llvm
-o - %s | FileCheck %s
+
+namespace std {
erichkeane wrote:
Tests STILL haven't changed from the original patch. Please add the regression
to this test as well.
h
@@ -224,11 +228,8 @@ IncrementalParser::IncrementalParser(Interpreter &Interp,
return; // PTU.takeError();
}
- if (CodeGenerator *CG = getCodeGen()) {
-std::unique_ptr M(CG->ReleaseModule());
-CG->StartModule("incr_module_" + std::to_string(P
1 - 100 of 357 matches
Mail list logo
