[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-16 Thread LLVM Continuous Integration via cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote: LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv7-global-isel` running on `linaro-clang-armv7-global-isel` while building `clang` at step 7 "ninja check 1". Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/39/builds/569 Here is the relevan

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-16 Thread LLVM Continuous Integration via cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote: LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64le-rhel` running on `ppc64le-clang-rhel-test` while building `clang` at step 7 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all". Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/145/builds/610 Here is th

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-16 Thread via cfe-commits
vfdff wrote: Oh, different targets may have different flag for argument, so should add target triple ? ``` +++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/math-libcalls-tbaa.cpp @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ // NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5 -// RUN: %clang_c

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-16 Thread LLVM Continuous Integration via cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote: LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage` running on `ppc64le-clang-multistage-test` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1". Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/76/builds/1076 Here is the

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-16 Thread LLVM Continuous Integration via cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote: LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-solaris11-sparcv9` running on `solaris11-sparcv9` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1". Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/13/builds/838 Here is the relevant piece of the

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-16 Thread via cfe-commits
vfdff wrote: hi @llvm-ci , would you tell the difference between **clang-armv8-quick** and **linaro-clang-armv8-quick** ? I don't reproduce the issue when I rebase this PR to the top upstream with following instruction (I works on tsv110 server, which is a armv8 target). > llvm/utils/update_

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-16 Thread LLVM Continuous Integration via cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote: LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64le-linux-test-suite` running on `ppc64le-clang-test-suite` while building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all". Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/95/builds/138

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-16 Thread LLVM Continuous Integration via cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote: LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv8-quick` running on `linaro-clang-armv8-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1". Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/1496 Here is the relevant piece of

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-16 Thread via cfe-commits
https://github.com/vfdff closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98704 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-16 Thread via cfe-commits
vfdff wrote: > LGTM > > Please don't use `[test]` as a prefix in commit messages; just use the same > prefix you'd use for the code change, e.g. `[clang codegen]` Thanks, I'll change it when land it . https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98704

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-16 Thread Eli Friedman via cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request. LGTM Please don't use `[test]` as a prefix in commit messages; just use the same prefix you'd use for the code change, e.g. `[clang codegen]` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98704 ___

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-16 Thread via cfe-commits
vfdff wrote: the case pass on window target with extra `extern "C"` for the function, but it is strange the linux target test has not finish. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98704 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-15 Thread via cfe-commits
https://github.com/vfdff updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98704 >From 1b8503202474c15aa46fc4cc9151003a8d3ca336 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zhongyunde 00443407 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 21:09:46 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC --- clang/test/C

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-12 Thread via cfe-commits
vfdff wrote: require Linux for this test as it time out on Windows ? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98704 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-12 Thread via cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Allen (vfdff) Changes Check whether timeout exists in the Windows operating system. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98704.diff 1 Files Affected: - (added) clang/test/CodeGen/math-libcalls-tbaa.cpp (+38) `

[clang] [test] Precommit tests for PR96025, NFC (PR #98704)

2024-07-12 Thread via cfe-commits
https://github.com/vfdff created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98704 Check whether timeout exists in the Windows operating system. >From 1b8503202474c15aa46fc4cc9151003a8d3ca336 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zhongyunde 00443407 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 21:09:46 -0400 Subject: [PATCH]