Endilll wrote:
I'm sorry it took us a while.
The first step is to get the PR out of draft state.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115234
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
Changes to C++ DR tests LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/43
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
This was discussed during Clang C/C++ Language Working Group meeting today, and
the consensus seems that this PR shouldn't land before Clang 20 branch, which
is scheduled to happen on January 28th.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122423
Endilll wrote:
I don't feel qualified to review this, but I appreciate that you fix holes in
my original quite naive implementation.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122726
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121667
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
The failure reminds me of #122063, which was merged just 2 hours ago.
Do you mind merging the `main` into your PR and try again?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
htt
@@ -1328,4 +1328,57 @@ void SemaARM::handleInterruptAttr(Decl *D, const
ParsedAttr &AL) {
ARMInterruptAttr(getASTContext(), AL, Kind));
}
+// Check if the function definition uses any AArch64 SME features without
+// having the '+sme' feature enabled and warn
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121785
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
Yes, you handled the creation of `SemaSPIRV` perfectly.
(I'm the one who introduced the rest of `Sema*` parts.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121598
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-com
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121687
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121785
One of our contributors got confused by the behavior of the script when they
incorrectly specified the status of a CWG issue
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102857/files#r1904264872), and this
is an
@@ -174,6 +174,26 @@ static_assert(!__is_layout_compatible(StructWithAnonUnion,
StructWithAnonUnion3)
#endif
} // namespace cwg2759
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+namespace cwg2770 { // cwg2770: 20
Endilll wrote:
> Yes, I implemented what that issue proposed.
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2025-01-06T18:32:44+03:00
New Revision: 1229b78f1676d56d0d386a5c4cde8f98a78d0989
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1229b78f1676d56d0d386a5c4cde8f98a78d0989
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1229b78f1676d56d0d386a5c4cde8f98a78d0989.
@@ -41,6 +42,141 @@ namespace cwg202 { // cwg202: 3.1
template struct X;
}
+namespace cwg203 { // cwg203: 3.0
+namespace ex1 {
+struct B {
+ int i;
+};
+struct D1 : B {};
+struct D2 : B {};
+
+int(D1::*pmD1) = &D2::i;
+} // namespace ex1
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+names
@@ -41,6 +42,141 @@ namespace cwg202 { // cwg202: 3.1
template struct X;
}
+namespace cwg203 { // cwg203: 3.0
+namespace ex1 {
+struct B {
+ int i;
+};
+struct D1 : B {};
+struct D2 : B {};
+
+int(D1::*pmD1) = &D2::i;
+} // namespace ex1
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+names
@@ -41,6 +42,141 @@ namespace cwg202 { // cwg202: 3.1
template struct X;
}
+namespace cwg203 { // cwg203: 3.0
+namespace ex1 {
+struct B {
+ int i;
+};
+struct D1 : B {};
+struct D2 : B {};
+
+int(D1::*pmD1) = &D2::i;
+} // namespace ex1
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+names
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121687
>From bca2bfe17b71faeebf65eba11adcb70927f878fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 13:58:16 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Add test for CWG203 "Type of address-of-member
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2025-01-06T17:30:39+03:00
New Revision: b79d3b9519620e34f0e223fdb4a6731db6cda88f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b79d3b9519620e34f0e223fdb4a6731db6cda88f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b79d3b9519620e34f0e223fdb4a6731db6cda88f.
@@ -174,6 +174,26 @@ static_assert(!__is_layout_compatible(StructWithAnonUnion,
StructWithAnonUnion3)
#endif
} // namespace cwg2759
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+namespace cwg2770 { // cwg2770: 20
Endilll wrote:
CWG2770 is still open (`clang/www/make_cxx_dr_s
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121687
>From bca2bfe17b71faeebf65eba11adcb70927f878fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 13:58:16 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Add test for CWG203 "Type of address-of-member
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2025-01-06T12:58:15+03:00
New Revision: 3c5f2698b02ae3cec13551226f083984ab41f0f3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3c5f2698b02ae3cec13551226f083984ab41f0f3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3c5f2698b02ae3cec13551226f083984ab41f0f3.
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2025-01-06T12:29:31+03:00
New Revision: eff126501efc3981727ef0e918c4dca0fa2eb778
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eff126501efc3981727ef0e918c4dca0fa2eb778
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eff126501efc3981727ef0e918c4dca0fa2eb778.
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2025-01-06T12:24:18+03:00
New Revision: 2a593bbcf3b022a4ac11a76e03883d6aae2f000c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2a593bbcf3b022a4ac11a76e03883d6aae2f000c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2a593bbcf3b022a4ac11a76e03883d6aae2f000c.
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2025-01-05T21:29:32+03:00
New Revision: f53abc2db07abfa38af9365bc15572112adbe040
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f53abc2db07abfa38af9365bc15572112adbe040
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f53abc2db07abfa38af9365bc15572112adbe040.
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2025-01-05T20:46:23+03:00
New Revision: 743c84bb9b79ed70d9bed926c2a173db3b30f587
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/743c84bb9b79ed70d9bed926c2a173db3b30f587
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/743c84bb9b79ed70d9bed926c2a173db3b30f587.
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121688
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121654
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121654
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121654
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121688
This patch plugs holes in RUN lines in C++ DR tests, making sure they are run
in C++98 through C++26, with the exception of C++03, which in Clang is
synonymous to C++98.
>From d6e8b78f2209c4bc29d47b8d196ec9ec9
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121687
>From bca2bfe17b71faeebf65eba11adcb70927f878fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 13:58:16 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Add test for CWG203 "Type of address-of-member
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121687
This patch adds test for
[CWG203](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/203.html). Author was asking to
change the type of pointer-to-member expression to be closer to how it's
written as opposed to where the
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121654
>From dcd29ca8c77e24c532ca8300a7e46f5498ffebbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:37:46 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Add test for CWG156 "Name lookup for conversion
Endilll wrote:
> I wonder if we just mark that as superseded and/or N/A.
To do that, we need to downgrade CWG from being available in Clang 3.2 to
"partial", and merge in at least the test that doesn't pass. Maybe we should do
that anyway.
> The original requirements that lookup must find
@@ -922,6 +922,49 @@ namespace cwg155 { // cwg155: dup 632
// expected-warning@-1 {{braces around scalar initializer}}
}
+namespace cwg156 { // cwg156: partial
+namespace ex1 {
+struct A {
+ operator int();
+} a;
+void foo() {
+ typedef int T;
+ a.operator T(); // T is fo
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121660
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121679
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121679
This patch adds a rather simple test for
[CWG192](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/192.html). Parameter
declarations of member functions are not complete-class contexts (unlike
default arguments), so the
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121668
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121668
This patch adds test for
[CWG190](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/190.html), leveraging
`__is_layout_compatible` intrinsic added for C++20 `std::is_layout_compatible`.
I conservatively set the status to
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121667
This patch adds test for
[CWG170](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/170.html). The resolution adds
explicit undefined behavior, so I think the best we can do is to put the test
into constexpr evaluator. C
Endilll wrote:
> and I thought making just preferred_type warnings early would be especially
> insane :D
I don't necessarily agree. `preferred_type` is a relatively new thing, so we
can try doing something new here.
> [edit: I just realized even that might need to be an option because I can
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121660
This patch adds a test for
[CWG794](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/794.html), which is an NB
comment closed as NAD. Author was asked to bring a paper to Evolution, which
never happened. So we test for
Endilll wrote:
Looking at diagnostics in the test you add, I wonder why don't we issue them,
and especially the fixit, when we parse bit-field declaration. Why waiting
until assignment happens?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116785
___
cfe
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121654
This patch adds test for
[CWG156](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/156.html). The most relevant
piece of current wording is
[[basic.lookup.unqual]/5](https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.lookup#unqual-5):
> An
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121642
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121642
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121642
This patch brings our C++ DR status page up to date with WG21 updates.
[CWG1223](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/1223.html) "Syntactic
disambiguation and _trailing-return-types_" is resolved by
[P2915R0
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
You should add a release note and a PR description.
LGTM otherwise.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120483
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
@@ -71,3 +71,5 @@ pythonenv*
/clang/utils/analyzer/projects/*/RefScanBuildResults
# automodapi puts generated documentation files here.
/lldb/docs/python_api/
+silver-debug
+silver-build
Endilll wrote:
Those are unrelated changes that should remain local to yo
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113754
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
I'm sorry it took us a while to notice this PR.
I think that documentation of new functions should describe what happens on
unhappy code paths, too.
I also would like to see unit tests and a release note.
Even more, I'd like @AaronBallman to sign this off
Endilll wrote:
> For such an implementation that makes that choice, it would seem appropriate
> for define_aggregate to also be idempotent. But that should be a specific
> rule for that implementation, not a rule that appears in the standard. And we
> certainly shouldn't change the standard to
Endilll wrote:
> > > the special "the language rules say this is manifestly constant
> > > evaluated" cases that should be able to perform AST mutations, that we
> > > need to be extremely careful to invoke at exactly the right times and in
> > > exactly the right cases and to invoke only once
Endilll wrote:
For the record, Aaron is not on vacation. So if you need his sign-off, you
should wait.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116719
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
Endilll wrote:
> the special "the language rules say this is manifestly constant evaluated"
> cases that should be able to perform AST mutations, that we need to be
> extremely careful to invoke at exactly the right times and in exactly the
> right cases and to invoke only once
Can you expand
Endilll wrote:
@zygoloid I definitely don't disagree with your points. After extensive
discussions with other maintainers (Shafik, Corentin, Erich, Aaron), I went
from passing the callback explicitly to very implicit approach, because of
reasons that lie outside of usage of AST in Clang itself
Endilll wrote:
I added Sema callback into the new interpreter in
0b2d92e0fed41ee2428c3ef8b8369790a1279a21. I think it went smoothly, save for
the fact that source locations are not always readily available there, but they
are need to correctly emit diagnostics from Sema.
I invite @tbaederr to
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115168
>From 5ca48e03412b1b8e9253f13356b9cc957f6fd9e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:58:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] Add EvalASTMutator interface with
`InstantiateFunctio
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115168
>From 5ca48e03412b1b8e9253f13356b9cc957f6fd9e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:58:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] Add EvalASTMutator interface with
`InstantiateFunctio
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115168
>From 5ca48e03412b1b8e9253f13356b9cc957f6fd9e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:58:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] Add EvalASTMutator interface with
`InstantiateFunctio
Endilll wrote:
> @zygoloid @katzdm for awareness
This PR is still in flux. Discussions are lengthy and typically happen in
meetings.
My plan is to get to a stable point, write down how we got there, alternatives
rejected (with reasoning), and get the PR out of the draft status. This would
be
@@ -8328,6 +8329,13 @@ class ExprEvaluatorBase
const FunctionDecl *Definition = nullptr;
Stmt *Body = FD->getBody(Definition);
+if (Info.Ctx.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus26 && Info.getASTMutator() &&
Endilll wrote:
Fixed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
@@ -182,6 +182,17 @@ struct TypeInfoChars {
}
};
+// Interface that allows constant evaluator to mutate AST.
+// Sema is the only entity that can implement this.
+struct EvalASTMutator {
+ virtual ~EvalASTMutator() = default;
+
+ virtual void
+ InstantiateFunctionDefiniti
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115168
>From 5ca48e03412b1b8e9253f13356b9cc957f6fd9e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:58:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Add EvalASTMutator interface with
`InstantiateFunctionD
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115168
>From 5ca48e03412b1b8e9253f13356b9cc957f6fd9e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:58:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Add EvalASTMutator interface with
`InstantiateFunctionD
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115168
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115168
>From 5ca48e03412b1b8e9253f13356b9cc957f6fd9e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:58:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Add EvalASTMutator interface with
`InstantiateFunctionD
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115168
>From 5ca48e03412b1b8e9253f13356b9cc957f6fd9e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:58:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add EvalASTMutator interface with
`InstantiateFunctionD
Endilll wrote:
> > > @Endilll, please, could you take a look?
> >
> >
> > My knowledge of wording about templates is not deep enough, unfortunately.
>
> Could you, please, suggest someone who can review this part?
I've already added several people who should be able to, but mind that we're
v
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115168
>From 5ca48e03412b1b8e9253f13356b9cc957f6fd9e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:58:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add EvalASTMutator interface with
`InstantiateFunctionD
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115168
None
>From 5ca48e03412b1b8e9253f13356b9cc957f6fd9e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:58:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add EvalASTMutator interface with
`InstantiateFun
Endilll wrote:
> @Endilll, please, could you take a look?
My knowledge of wording about templates is not deep enough, unfortunately.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
Endilll wrote:
> Also, do you have any ideas why the Win pipeline fails with checkout failure?
> How can I fix it?
It seems to be unrelated to you. Might be fixed when you'll push a new commit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114978
___
cfe
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114781
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114409
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114397
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114399
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114395
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
Well, you fix of the test is not really functional either, but definitely
deserves more attention than the rest of the changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114383
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
htt
https://github.com/Endilll requested changes to this pull request.
Thank you for putting effort into this!
You're mixing up non-functional and functional changes here (thank you for
highlighting the mistake you've previously made, it's buried rather deep!), so
I'd like to ask you to split this
Endilll wrote:
> @Endilll Could you please help me reaching out to the right set of reviewers?
Aaron noticed it faster 😄
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109574
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cg
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114040
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113736
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113736
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113736
>From b23ce76d3db79eab6433bef1bd3fc9d26bcb3309 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 23:05:06 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][NFC] Add test for CWG issues about linkage in
@@ -0,0 +1,548 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg1884_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg1884_A.pcm
+// RUN: %cl
@@ -0,0 +1,548 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg1884_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg1884_A.pcm
+// RUN: %cl
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113736
>From b23ce76d3db79eab6433bef1bd3fc9d26bcb3309 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 23:05:06 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][NFC] Add test for CWG issues about linkage in
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113736
>From b23ce76d3db79eab6433bef1bd3fc9d26bcb3309 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 23:05:06 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][NFC] Add test for CWG issues about linkage in
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113736
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,548 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg1884_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg1884_A.pcm
+// RUN: %cl
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg279_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg279_A.pcm
+// RUN: %clang
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file --leading-lines %s %t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -pedantic-errors -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
%t/cwg279_A.cppm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -emit-module-interface -o
%t/cwg279_A.pcm
+// RUN: %clang
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113736
>From b23ce76d3db79eab6433bef1bd3fc9d26bcb3309 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 23:05:06 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][NFC] Add test for CWG issues about linkage in
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113736
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
How did this get through pre-merge testing, I wonder.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113614
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113736
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 1542 matches
Mail list logo
