ksu.shadura added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45766#1098823, @Quuxplusone wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45766#1097797, @ksu.shadura wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the test example! I got your point, but I wanted to ask if it
> > should be like this for commutative operations?
> >
ksu.shadura added a comment.
Thank you for the test example! I got your point, but I wanted to ask if it
should be like this for commutative operations?
In our case it is actually matrix, and subtraction of matrices is not
commutative operation..
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org
ksu.shadura added a comment.
Hi,
we see the false-positive behavior of -Wno-self-assign-overloaded flag in case
of subtraction assignment operator.
The minimal reproducer that we got: https://godbolt.org/g/8PQMpR
typedef int Int_t;
typedef double Double_t;
class TObject {};
template c
