llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-0` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/15560
Here is the releva
sharadhr wrote:
@Prabhuk not quite sure why I was mentioned here—which change are you referring
to?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125646
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126689
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
Thanks for the prompt fix. The explanation makes sense to me, however please
wait for @kadircet to confirm this fixes their problems.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126689
___
cfe-commi
HighCommander4 wrote:
The explanation in [this
comment](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/126536#issuecomment-2649966528)
may provide useful context for reviewing this fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126689
___
cfe-commits ma
pskrgag wrote:
> tagged as "clang: static analyzer"
I think we can. Labeler logic is located there and there is no
clang/test/Analysis
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/.github/new-prs-labeler.yml#L496
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126539
__
https://github.com/pskrgag approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126539
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
metaflow wrote:
thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Nathan Ridge (HighCommander4)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/126536
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126689.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/HeuristicResolver.cpp (+29
https://github.com/HighCommander4 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126689
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/126536
>From e5a3d7aa5362357acd30ef5d1bafaa814ac2c89f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Ridge
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 01:56:50 -0500
Subject: [PATCH]
ravurvi20 wrote:
@mjklemm I addressed the changes that you requested. Kindly review it and let
me know if any further modifications are required.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125648
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-0` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/15558
Here is the releva
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+; RUN: opt -S -dxil-op-lower -mtriple=dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s |
FileCheck %s
+
+; CHECK: %dx.types.i32c = type { i32, i1 }
Icohedron wrote:
Perhaps I made the incorrect assumption that UAddc only accepts scalars. In the
current imple
https://github.com/metaflow closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: higher-performance
Date: 2025-02-11T07:52:13+01:00
New Revision: 90192e8872cc90b4d292b180a49babf72d17e579
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/90192e8872cc90b4d292b180a49babf72d17e579
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/90192e8872cc90b4d292b180a49babf72d17e579.
https://github.com/compnerd approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126675
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#126687
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126390
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126674
None
>From 46fda036a1b2955b66421e3dfcba52f8391325b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:02:15 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Sema] Avoid repeated hash lookups (NFC)
---
clang/
https://github.com/vikramRH approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126585
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ben Shi
Date: 2025-02-11T14:04:28+08:00
New Revision: 170b9caf335eb99cdecba0fb6cdf45728bcac11d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/170b9caf335eb99cdecba0fb6cdf45728bcac11d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/170b9caf335eb99cdecba0fb6cdf45728bcac11d.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/benshi001 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125997
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126672.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGOpenMPRuntime.cpp (+5-6)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGOp
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126672.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGOpenMPRuntime.cpp (+5-6)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Code
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126672
None
>From 170f0f3c53a64714b8d1257516a910d644b28992 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:00:20 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [CodeGen] Avoid repeated hash lookups (NFC)
---
cla
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Amit Kumar Pandey (ampandey-1995)
Changes
… (#126628)
This reverts commit 0c6c4a99936d4d39015c8d2332483f8db78f69cf.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126671.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Dr
https://github.com/ampandey-1995 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126671
… (#126628)
This reverts commit 0c6c4a99936d4d39015c8d2332483f8db78f69cf.
>From 3ddcfd96fac0ee0cc11dae494435a2aca7bcd7e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amit Pandey
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:06:21 +0530
S
ergawy wrote:
Ping! Please take a look when you have time. And let me know if you disagree
with any decisions taken in the current approach or need any
clarification/expansion in the next steps section of the status tracking
document.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026
_
@@ -142,6 +142,12 @@ static llvm::cl::opt
llvm::cl::desc("enable openmp device compilation"),
llvm::cl::init(false));
+static llvm::cl::opt enableDoConcurrentToOpenMPConversion(
+"fdo-concurrent-parallel",
erga
@@ -6910,6 +6910,10 @@ defm loop_versioning : BoolOptionWithoutMarshalling<"f",
"version-loops-for-stri
def fhermetic_module_files : Flag<["-"], "fhermetic-module-files">,
Group,
HelpText<"Emit hermetic module files (no nested USE association)">;
+
+def do_concurrent_paral
https://github.com/ergawy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026
>From 4ea51578a841ae29e17a366d96a7c0f626806623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ergawy
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 23:31:15 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream first part of `do concurrent`
mapping
This PR
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
// RUN: %clang -### -nogpuinc -nogpulib --offload-arch=gfx1030
--offload-arch=gfx1100 --offload-arch=gfx1101 -MD -MF tmp.d %s 2>&1 | FileCheck
%s
Sharjeel-Khan wrote:
I added --target=x86_64-linux-gnu to the command. I just need a review so I c
https://github.com/Sharjeel-Khan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126585
>From f8b2aa2393ae9cc5329790a78dc995017968a8a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sharjeel Khan
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:30:06 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix test for HIP as it was failing
This PR #125646 ad
https://github.com/Sharjeel-Khan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126585
>From f8b2aa2393ae9cc5329790a78dc995017968a8a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sharjeel Khan
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:30:06 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix test for HIP as it was failing
This PR #125646 ad
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64-aix` running
on `aix-ppc64` while building `clang,libc,libcxx,llvm` at step 3
"clean-build-dir".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/64/builds/2232
Here is the relevant piece
https://github.com/Flandini edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/14428
Here is th
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#12
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126627
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hekota closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124840
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Helena Kotas
Date: 2025-02-10T21:19:13-08:00
New Revision: 1a0de96c95feaffb3c05159305edce8c7c47057f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1a0de96c95feaffb3c05159305edce8c7c47057f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1a0de96c95feaffb3c05159305edce8c7c47057f.diff
https://github.com/phoebewang milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126627
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
phoebewang wrote:
/cherry-pick af522c5dd3a38cc5e11e8e62009d7dbe2cde2d86
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126627
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126627
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Mikołaj Piróg
Date: 2025-02-11T13:13:36+08:00
New Revision: af522c5dd3a38cc5e11e8e62009d7dbe2cde2d86
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/af522c5dd3a38cc5e11e8e62009d7dbe2cde2d86
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/af522c5dd3a38cc5e11e8e62009d7dbe2cde2d86.diff
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
// RUN: %clang -### -nogpuinc -nogpulib --offload-arch=gfx1030
--offload-arch=gfx1100 --offload-arch=gfx1101 -MD -MF tmp.d %s 2>&1 | FileCheck
%s
vikramRH wrote:
@lalaniket8 is not available for rest of the week, but this looks okay to me.
Als
@@ -6749,6 +6749,21 @@ void SemaCodeCompletion::CodeCompleteInitializer(Scope
*S, Decl *D) {
CodeCompleteExpression(S, Data);
}
+void SemaCodeCompletion::CodeCompleteIfConstExpr(Scope *S) const {
+ ResultBuilder Results(SemaRef, CodeCompleter->getAllocator(),
+
@@ -6749,6 +6749,21 @@ void SemaCodeCompletion::CodeCompleteInitializer(Scope
*S, Decl *D) {
CodeCompleteExpression(S, Data);
}
+void SemaCodeCompletion::CodeCompleteIfConstExpr(Scope *S) const {
+ ResultBuilder Results(SemaRef, CodeCompleter->getAllocator(),
+
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ class SemaCodeCompletion : public SemaBase {
void CodeCompleteDesignator(const QualType BaseType,
llvm::ArrayRef InitExprs,
const Designation &D);
+ void CodeCompleteIfConstExpr(Scope *S) const;
@@ -6749,6 +6749,21 @@ void SemaCodeCompletion::CodeCompleteInitializer(Scope
*S, Decl *D) {
CodeCompleteExpression(S, Data);
}
+void SemaCodeCompletion::CodeCompleteIfConstExpr(Scope *S) const {
+ ResultBuilder Results(SemaRef, CodeCompleter->getAllocator(),
+
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#126659
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125001
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -163,10 +163,13 @@ bool isConstOwnerPtrMemberExpr(const clang::Expr *E) {
if (OCE->getOperator() == OO_Star && OCE->getNumArgs() == 1)
E = OCE->getArg(0);
}
- auto *ME = dyn_cast(E);
- if (!ME)
+ const ValueDecl *D = nullptr;
+ if (auto *ME = dyn_cast(E))
+
https://github.com/t-rasmud deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126353
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -163,10 +163,13 @@ bool isConstOwnerPtrMemberExpr(const clang::Expr *E) {
if (OCE->getOperator() == OO_Star && OCE->getNumArgs() == 1)
E = OCE->getArg(0);
}
- auto *ME = dyn_cast(E);
- if (!ME)
+ const ValueDecl *D = nullptr;
+ if (auto *ME = dyn_cast(E))
+
https://github.com/spall ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118992
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/spall updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118992
>From e994824f3630ee8b224afceb6c14d980c9013112 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sarah Spall
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 05:14:17 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] splat cast wip
---
clang/include/clang/AST/OperationKinds.def
https://github.com/fmayer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126658
>From cc8aa7242294c5af5ae839396f02acc22b3afbb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Mayer
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:10:56 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?UT
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Florian Mayer (fmayer)
Changes
IsLastOrInvalidFieldDecl would always return true if `Invalid=true`, so
we know that !IsLastOrInvalidFieldDecl(...) means !Invalid.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126658.diff
1 Fi
https://github.com/fmayer created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126658
IsLastOrInvalidFieldDecl would always return true if `Invalid=true`, so
we know that !IsLastOrInvalidFieldDecl(...) means !Invalid.
>From cc8aa7242294c5af5ae839396f02acc22b3afbb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: F
wjristow wrote:
/cherry-pick 00c096e604ad3a5244af06602556f8de867e36c4
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125001
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/wjristow milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125001
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bd1976bris edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126654
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bd1976bris wrote:
> ⚠️ C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. ⚠️
>
> You can test this locally with the following command:
> View the diff from clang-format here.
I believe this failure is OK as I have followed the (non-standard) formatting
in the flagged file which the
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Florian Mayer (fmayer)
Changes
it is not used mutably
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126656.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/AST/DeclBase.h (+1-1)
- (modified) clang/include/clang/AST/E
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ class ConstantDataSequential : public ConstantData {
Type *getElementType() const;
/// Return the number of elements in the array or vector.
- unsigned getNumElements() const;
+ uint64_t getNumElements() const;
pzzp wrote:
Similarly,
@@ -1184,8 +1196,10 @@ void
Sema::ActOnLambdaExpressionAfterIntroducer(LambdaIntroducer &Intro,
// for e.g., [n{0}] { }; <-- if no is included.
// FIXME: we should create the init capture variable and mark it invalid
// in this case.
- if (C->InitCaptur
https://github.com/pzzp edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -364,13 +364,13 @@ bool ConstantAggregateBuilder::split(size_t Index,
CharUnits Hint) {
// FIXME: If possible, split into two ConstantDataSequentials at Hint.
CharUnits ElemSize = getSize(CDS->getElementType());
replace(Elems, Index, Index + 1,
-llvm
@@ -188,3 +188,19 @@ void other_main() {
static_assert(f() == 2);
}
} // namespace
+
+
+namespace GH125165 {
+
+template
+auto f(auto t) {
+const auto& [...pack] = t;
+// expected-error@-1 {{cannot decompose non-class, non-array type 'char
const'}}
+(pack, ...)
https://github.com/pzzp edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pzzp updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126481
>From aa4338d8d5809fdb91620e48619634fcf4403a4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhoupeng12
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 18:13:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm:ir] Add support for constant data exceeding 4GiB
---
clang/lib/
@@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ static void printConstant(const Constant *COp, unsigned
BitWidth,
bool IsInteger = EltTy->isIntegerTy();
bool IsFP = EltTy->isHalfTy() || EltTy->isFloatTy() || EltTy->isDoubleTy();
unsigned EltBits = EltTy->getPrimitiveSizeInBits();
-unsig
@@ -2347,6 +2347,27 @@ Sema::BuildDeclRefExpr(ValueDecl *D, QualType Ty,
ExprValueKind VK,
return E;
}
+// Check whether a similar function-like macro exists and suggest it
+static bool isFunctionLikeMacro(const DeclarationName &Name, Sema &SemaRef,
+
dtarditi wrote:
@haoNoQ Thank you for the welcome and the helpful information!
Your suggestion sounds good to me. I had actually started down this route
initially of pointing out the logical error of using a variable before it is
initialized. I changed direction because I was not sure where
@@ -5618,9 +5618,17 @@ def nogpuinc : Flag<["-"], "nogpuinc">,
Group,
def nohipwrapperinc : Flag<["-"], "nohipwrapperinc">, Group,
HelpText<"Do not include the default HIP wrapper headers and include paths">;
def : Flag<["-"], "nocudainc">, Alias;
-def nogpulib : Flag<["-"],
haoNoQ wrote:
Welcome!!
I completely agree that the message sounds a bit too much like "your code is
garbage" and that's not very nice.
Here's a tangent suggestion to get a better wording out of this. You can
exploit the fact that the static analyzer usually catches undefined values
_very ea
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125599
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Icohedron updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125599
>From dc616212f496098776d30f56151213d530917ba2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Icohedron
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 23:10:16 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Reapply "Reland "[HLSL] Implement the `reflect` HLSL
function"
@@ -5618,9 +5618,17 @@ def nogpuinc : Flag<["-"], "nogpuinc">,
Group,
def nohipwrapperinc : Flag<["-"], "nohipwrapperinc">, Group,
HelpText<"Do not include the default HIP wrapper headers and include paths">;
def : Flag<["-"], "nocudainc">, Alias;
-def nogpulib : Flag<["-"],
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
If `CXString createRef(StringRef)` is essentially equivalent to `CXString
createDup(StringRef)`, should we just get rid of `CXString
createRef(StringRef)`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125020
_
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 2feced1df0aa01f78501720b98faa985bcec846a
cadd309a7d7c61a592d11cb306d44139df8d15ee --e
AZero13 wrote:
I'd like to take this a step further.
What if we can also incorporate this with the knowledge that base classes with
their implementation can also be subject to this:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85465
What do you think? @ahatanak
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pro
https://github.com/spall updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118992
>From e994824f3630ee8b224afceb6c14d980c9013112 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sarah Spall
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 05:14:17 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] splat cast wip
---
clang/include/clang/AST/OperationKinds.def
https://github.com/llvm-beanz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123141
>From a5d0d86b71ac7d7083295f255b42d991859a62f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bieneman
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:40:29 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [HLSL] Implement HLSL intialization list support
This P
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64le-rhel`
running on `ppc64le-clang-rhel-test` while building `clang,libc,libcxx,llvm` at
step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/145/builds/5052
Here i
@@ -864,11 +864,18 @@ INTERCEPTOR(void *, pvalloc, size_t size) {
#define RTSAN_MAYBE_INTERCEPT_PVALLOC
#endif
+#if !SANITIZER_FREEBSD
+// enabling this interception on freebsd leads to infinite recursion
+// on pthread lib initialization
cjappl wrote:
It loo
NagyDonat wrote:
Yes, obviously "garbage" has negative connotations, but we want to report an
_error_, so we need to have some negative connotations. It's pointless to start
an [euphemism treadmill](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/euphemism_treadmill)
because it just introduces churn without ac
Author: Nico Weber
Date: 2025-02-10T18:04:01-05:00
New Revision: 44fcc5cdacc5ed33e096f50d05e1ab1260a944c0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/44fcc5cdacc5ed33e096f50d05e1ab1260a944c0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/44fcc5cdacc5ed33e096f50d05e1ab1260a944c0.diff
LO
https://github.com/NagyDonat requested changes to this pull request.
I think "garbage" is a perfectly acceptable word, I don't think that its
"snarkiness" is a problem. (Note that e.g. "garbage collector" is a
well-established notion in programming.)
Even if you want to replace it, you need to
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Michael Flanders (Flandini)
Changes
Reapplying changes from https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125638 after
buildbot failures.
Buildbot failures fixed in 029e7e98dc9956086adc6c1dfb0c655a273fbee6, latest
commit on this PR. It was a
https://github.com/Flandini created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126620
Reapplying changes from https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125638 after
buildbot failures.
Buildbot failures fixed in 029e7e98dc9956086adc6c1dfb0c655a273fbee6, latest
commit on this PR. It was a proble
https://github.com/Flandini closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126618
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
dtarditi wrote:
@steakhal Yes, the term garbage has a negative connotation when used as an
adjective in English. By a little snarky, the user meant that the message
could be seen as a little overly critical. The user suggested using more
neutral terminology.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-p
@@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ void Preprocessor::RegisterBuiltinMacros() {
Ident__has_builtin = RegisterBuiltinMacro("__has_builtin");
Ident__has_constexpr_builtin =
RegisterBuiltinMacro("__has_constexpr_builtin");
+ Ident__has_target_builtin = RegisterBuiltinMacro("__has_targ
https://github.com/Flandini edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126618
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ void Preprocessor::RegisterBuiltinMacros() {
Ident__has_builtin = RegisterBuiltinMacro("__has_builtin");
Ident__has_constexpr_builtin =
RegisterBuiltinMacro("__has_constexpr_builtin");
+ Ident__has_target_builtin = RegisterBuiltinMacro("__has_targ
https://github.com/Flandini edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126618
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bob80905 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124840
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126596
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -864,11 +864,18 @@ INTERCEPTOR(void *, pvalloc, size_t size) {
#define RTSAN_MAYBE_INTERCEPT_PVALLOC
#endif
+#if !SANITIZER_FREEBSD
+// enabling this interception on freebsd leads to infinite recursion
+// on pthread lib initialization
devnexen wrote:
sure
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 5 "compile-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/13004
Here is the relevant p
@@ -864,11 +864,18 @@ INTERCEPTOR(void *, pvalloc, size_t size) {
#define RTSAN_MAYBE_INTERCEPT_PVALLOC
#endif
+#if !SANITIZER_FREEBSD
+// enabling this interception on freebsd leads to infinite recursion
+// on pthread lib initialization
davidtrevelyan wrote:
1 - 100 of 556 matches
Mail list logo
