https://github.com/alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109147
From d369d26aad940299eb98ff0c322614043144c558 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Alejandro=20=C3=81lvarez=20Ayll=C3=B3n?=
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 13:56:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [
tbaederr wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109981
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-10-10T08:40:14+02:00
New Revision: f93258e4aca518cba3d48db59ed6143ca19ca99b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f93258e4aca518cba3d48db59ed6143ca19ca99b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f93258e4aca518cba3d48db59ed6143ca19ca99b.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111700
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
NagyDonat wrote:
Thanks for the explanation, I agree with your POV and I don't think that we
need a drastic change like renaming or reordering everything.
However, in this case I think it would be good to remove the type based section
headers, which are no longer accurate. When someone adds a
steakhal wrote:
> @steakhal As I was browsing the list of analyzer options, I was surprised to
> see that the numerical unsigned options added by this commit are placed in
> the "Boolean analyzer options" section of AnalyzerOptions.def.
I understand that it's natural to group them together with
mstorsjo wrote:
Thanks @sdkrystian for pushing the revert - now my nightly tests this night
were back to green :-)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/
NagyDonat wrote:
@steakhal As I was browsing the list of analyzer options, I was surprised to
see that the numerical `unsigned` options added by this commit are placed in
the "Boolean analyzer options" section of `AnalyzerOptions.def`.
I understand that it's natural to group them together with
owenca wrote:
@ichaer I forgot to mention that you would need to update
`docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+//===-- clang/Support/Compiler.h - Compiler abstraction support -*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
owenca wrote:
> @owenca, see what you think.
IMO it would be more helpful to add the build target to
`lib/Format/CMakeLists.txt` instead. For example,
```
$ ninja FormatTests
[1/1] cd /Users/Owen/llvm-project/clang12/bin/python3.12 dump_format_style.p
$
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
https://github.com/ssahasra closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Sameer Sahasrabuddhe
Date: 2024-10-10T10:48:40+05:30
New Revision: c86edd03adaaa49b70af8d74ab5e2a09c9daab37
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c86edd03adaaa49b70af8d74ab5e2a09c9daab37
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c86edd03adaaa49b70af8d74ab5e2a09c9daab3
@@ -1109,12 +1109,50 @@ bool Sema::EnsureTemplateArgumentListConstraints(
return false;
}
-bool Sema::CheckInstantiatedFunctionTemplateConstraints(
+static bool CheckFunctionConstraintsWithoutInstantiation(
+Sema &SemaRef, SourceLocation PointOfInstantiation,
+Functi
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
Looks good to me as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110099
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mizvekov wrote:
I am not sure I can offer a better option here. The global change seems odd,
and I think it may run into other problems.
One option would be to do the big hammer approach as you suggest, but then
afterwards back out and then try to nail the places where the most recent
declara
owenca wrote:
> Also, why can't we just run the python script as part of building the docs
> instead of committing the result of the script to the repository?
Because only part of the doc is generated by `dump_format_style.py`. See
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/1809d0fa1c15b16ca943
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111573
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Amr Hesham
Date: 2024-10-10T06:47:48+02:00
New Revision: 562999a9f32779c7017235969ec62d99e51a7865
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/562999a9f32779c7017235969ec62d99e51a7865
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/562999a9f32779c7017235969ec62d99e51a7865.diff
LO
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107786
>From e9948a1004cc2b486a0422d83e88392754e9f7e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:17:30 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] prevent recovery call expression from proceeding
w
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110435
>From c52634882631a71fad956a70179b480abf13006a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 22:01:38 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] fix overload resolution for object parameters
with
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Petr Hosek (petrhosek)
Changes
This is a dependency of #80007.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111791.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/cmake/caches/Fuchsia-stage2.cmake (+2)
``diff
diff --git
petrhosek wrote:
> @petrhosek Where is the cache generating that build?
>
> The fix for this is:
>
> ```
> # On embedded platforms that don't support shared library targets, CMake
> implicitly changes shared
> # library targets to be static library targets. This results in duplicate
> definit
https://github.com/petrhosek created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111791
This is a dependency of #80007.
>From f9087b9d82954af96c80a41527dbe33e8d987086 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Hosek
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 04:24:01 +
Subject: [PATCH] [Fuchsia][CMake] Set output name
@@ -276,6 +276,14 @@ foreach i = 0...15 in {
foreach i = 0...63 in
def : SysReg<"pmpaddr"#i, !add(0x3B0, i)>;
+//===--===//
+// Machine Non-Maskable Interrupt Handling
+//===-
@@ -1913,6 +1913,66 @@ csrrs t1, mhpmcounter31, zero
csrrs t2, 0xB1F, zero
+##
+# Machine Counter Setup
topperc wrote:
Section title is incorrect.
The registers are already tested in rv32-machine-csr-names.s but they shou
@@ -276,6 +276,14 @@ foreach i = 0...15 in {
foreach i = 0...63 in
def : SysReg<"pmpaddr"#i, !add(0x3B0, i)>;
+//===--===//
+// Machine Non-Maskable Interrupt Handling
+//===-
https://github.com/topperc edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111668
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-m68k-linux-cross`
running on `suse-gary-m68k-cross` while building `llvm` at step 5 "ninja check
1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/27/builds/398
Here is the relevant piece of
https://github.com/wangpc-pp edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111668
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -276,6 +276,14 @@ foreach i = 0...15 in {
foreach i = 0...63 in
def : SysReg<"pmpaddr"#i, !add(0x3B0, i)>;
+//===--===//
+// Machine Non-Maskable Interrupt Handling
+//===-
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ def riscv_sret_glue : SDNode<"RISCVISD::SRET_GLUE", SDTNone,
[SDNPHasChain, SDNPOptInGlue]>;
def riscv_mret_glue : SDNode<"RISCVISD::MRET_GLUE", SDTNone,
[SDNPHasChain, SDNPOptInGlue]>;
+def riscv_mnret
@@ -924,17 +924,20 @@
ItaniumCXXABI::EmitMemberPointerConversion(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
if (isa(src))
return EmitMemberPointerConversion(E, cast(src));
+ QualType DstType = E->getType(), SrcType = E->getSubExpr()->getType();
pranavk wrote:
`SrcType` is
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111785.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified)
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/ForwardDeclarationNamespaceCheck.cpp
(+3-2)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111785.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified)
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/ForwardDeclarationNamespaceCheck.cpp
(+3-2)
``
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111785
None
>From 14e7f5dd2176e4fbde0fd699e5a7088239d8faf0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:52:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Avoid repeated hash lookups (NFC)
---
.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111784.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clang-change-namespace/ChangeNamespace.cpp
(+1-2)
``diff
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111784
None
>From faf633c5d8a3f255aca95d80bbc4e4e2eede84e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:51:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-change-namespace] Avoid repeated hash lookups (
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111783.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified)
clang-tools-extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/ApplyReplacements.cpp
(+2-5)
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111783
None
>From f64ab109642e2fa26b6fc58bb84416787996c685 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:51:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-apply-replacements] Avoid repeated hash lookups
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110435
>From c52634882631a71fad956a70179b480abf13006a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 22:01:38 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] fix overload resolution for object parameters
with
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107786
>From e9948a1004cc2b486a0422d83e88392754e9f7e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:17:30 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] prevent recovery call expression from proceeding
w
everythingfunctional wrote:
@kiranchandramohan , I don't have commit access, so could you merge for me?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110023
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple
dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s -fnative-half-type -emit-llvm -O1 -o - |
FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple
spirv-vulkan-library %s -fnative-half-type -emit-ll
@@ -18901,6 +18901,159 @@ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_elementwise_isinf: {
CGM.getHLSLRuntime().getRadiansIntrinsic(), ArrayRef{Op0},
nullptr, "hlsl.radians");
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_splitdouble: {
+
+assert((E->getArg(0)->getType()->hasFlo
@@ -18901,6 +18901,159 @@ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_elementwise_isinf: {
CGM.getHLSLRuntime().getRadiansIntrinsic(), ArrayRef{Op0},
nullptr, "hlsl.radians");
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_splitdouble: {
+
+assert((E->getArg(0)->getType()->hasFlo
@@ -461,6 +479,27 @@ class OpLowerer {
});
}
+ [[nodiscard]] bool lowerSplitDouble(Function &F) {
+IRBuilder<> &IRB = OpBuilder.getIRB();
+return replaceFunction(F, [&](CallInst *CI) -> Error {
+ IRB.SetInsertPoint(CI);
+
+ Value *Arg0 = CI->getArgOper
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ def ResRetInt32Ty : DXILOpParamType;
def HandleTy : DXILOpParamType;
def ResBindTy : DXILOpParamType;
def ResPropsTy : DXILOpParamType;
+def ResSplitDoubleTy : DXILOpParamType;
bogner wrote:
This should just be "SplitDoubleTy". The types that
@@ -264,6 +264,24 @@ class OpLowerer {
return lowerToBindAndAnnotateHandle(F);
}
+ Error replaceSplitDoubleCallUsages(CallInst *Intrin, CallInst *Op) {
+IRBuilder<> &IRB = OpBuilder.getIRB();
+
+for (Use &U : make_early_inc_range(Intrin->uses())) {
+ if (au
@@ -4681,6 +4682,14 @@ void CallArg::copyInto(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Address
Addr) const {
IsUsed = true;
}
+void CodeGenFunction::EmitWritebacks(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
+ const CallArgList &Args) {
+ if (getTarget().getCXXABI().areArgsDest
@@ -18901,6 +18901,159 @@ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_elementwise_isinf: {
CGM.getHLSLRuntime().getRadiansIntrinsic(), ArrayRef{Op0},
nullptr, "hlsl.radians");
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_splitdouble: {
+
+assert((E->getArg(0)->getType()->hasFlo
HighCommander4 wrote:
@5chmidti since you've already looked at this, I'd be happy for you to approve
this if you're comfortable doing so.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95235
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
4ast wrote:
> BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW | BPF_LDX
I'd rather not. See my earlier comment. Existing *fetch* flavors return the
value.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
@@ -951,9 +951,16 @@ void Preprocessor::Lex(Token &Result) {
break;
[[fallthrough]];
default:
- TrackGMFState.handleMisc();
- StdCXXImportSeqState.handleMisc();
- ModuleDeclState.handleMisc();
+ if (tok::isPragmaAnnotation(Result.getKind())
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2024-10-10T09:36:00+08:00
New Revision: 03229e7c0b1f28b01a75d2d258b16b37c2d2e9b9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/03229e7c0b1f28b01a75d2d258b16b37c2d2e9b9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/03229e7c0b1f28b01a75d2d258b16b37c2d2e9b9.diff
@@ -97,27 +97,50 @@ enum XRayPatchingStatus {
/// for possible result values.
extern XRayPatchingStatus __xray_patch();
+extern XRayPatchingStatus __xray_patch_object(int32_t ObjId);
deanberris wrote:
Non-blocking: Is it possible to provide documentation to t
@@ -97,27 +97,50 @@ enum XRayPatchingStatus {
/// for possible result values.
extern XRayPatchingStatus __xray_patch();
+extern XRayPatchingStatus __xray_patch_object(int32_t ObjId);
+
/// Reverses the effect of __xray_patch(). See XRayPatchingStatus for possible
/// result
https://github.com/deanberris approved this pull request.
This is very exciting stuff, thank you for this patch!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90959
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mail
https://github.com/deanberris edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90959
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hekota updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111203
>From f545a14e11556c91d10b14617e3588fe5eae6d42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Helena Kotas
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 12:21:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [HLSL] Collect explicit resource binding information
(part 1)
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64le-rhel`
running on `ppc64le-clang-rhel-test` while building `clang,llvm` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/145/builds/2381
Here is the releva
https://github.com/hekota ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111203
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -115,12 +114,14 @@ struct Eg13{
MySRV s1;
MySRV s2;
};
-// expected-warning@+4{{binding type 'u' only applies to types containing UAV
resources}}
// expected-warning@+3{{binding type 'u' only applies to types containing UAV
resources}}
-// expected-warning@+2{{binding
@@ -1135,21 +1147,19 @@ static void ValidateMultipleRegisterAnnotations(Sema
&S, Decl *TheDecl,
RegisterType otherRegType = getRegisterType(attr->getSlot());
if (RegisterTypesDetected[static_cast(otherRegType)]) {
-if (PreviousConflicts[TheDecl].count(othe
@@ -4588,6 +4588,35 @@ def HLSLResourceBinding: InheritableAttr {
let LangOpts = [HLSL];
let Args = [StringArgument<"Slot">, StringArgument<"Space", 1>];
let Documentation = [HLSLResourceBindingDocs];
+ let AdditionalMembers = [{
+ enum class RegisterType : unsigned
@@ -2228,3 +2242,62 @@ QualType SemaHLSL::getInoutParameterType(QualType Ty) {
Ty.addRestrict();
return Ty;
}
+
+// Walks though existing explicit bindings, finds the actual resource class
+// decl the binding applies to and sets it to attr->ResourceField.
+// Additional pr
@@ -985,44 +983,43 @@ SemaHLSL::TakeLocForHLSLAttribute(const
HLSLAttributedResourceType *RT) {
return LocInfo;
}
-// get the record decl from a var decl that we expect
-// represents a resource
-static CXXRecordDecl *getRecordDeclFromVarDecl(VarDecl *VD) {
- const Type *T
@@ -2228,3 +2242,62 @@ QualType SemaHLSL::getInoutParameterType(QualType Ty) {
Ty.addRestrict();
return Ty;
}
+
+// Walks though existing explicit bindings, finds the actual resource class
+// decl the binding applies to and sets it to attr->ResourceField.
+// Additional pr
https://github.com/hekota edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111203
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android` running on `sanitizer-buildbot-android` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/186/builds/3073
Here is the r
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`ppc64le-lld-multistage-test` running on `ppc64le-lld-multistage-test` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 12 "build-stage2-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/168/builds/4263
https://github.com/hekota edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111203
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hekota updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111203
>From f545a14e11556c91d10b14617e3588fe5eae6d42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Helena Kotas
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 12:21:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [HLSL] Collect explicit resource binding information
(part 1)
@@ -190,11 +190,7 @@ class UncountedLocalVarsChecker
if (shouldSkipVarDecl(V))
return;
-const auto *ArgType = V->getType().getTypePtr();
-if (!ArgType)
haoNoQ wrote:
Fair enough!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110213
https://github.com/haoNoQ approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110213
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/haoNoQ approved this pull request.
Yes makes sense! I've no idea why this is a special case anyway.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
https://github.com/haoNoQ approved this pull request.
Aha LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111222
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-fuzzer` running on `sanitizer-buildbot11` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/159/builds/7851
Here is the relevan
Cydox wrote:
Changing the `struct_size` macro in the kernel [1] would likely be an
unreasonable amount of work. To quote Kees from the kernel mailing list [2]:
> [...] if we want to change struct_size(), then we must (via
allmodconfig builds) determine all the places in the kernel
where the cal
https://github.com/jkorous-apple approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111624
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
Rename the function to reflect its correct behavior and to be consistent with
`Module::getOrInsertFunction`. This is also in preparation of adding a new
`Intrinsic::getDeclaration` that will have beh
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
Rename the function to reflect its correct behavior and to be consistent with
`Module::getOrInsertFunction`. This is also in preparation of adding a new
`Intrinsic::getDeclaration` that will have be
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-debuginfo
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
Rename the function to reflect its correct behavior and to be consistent with
`Module::getOrInsertFunction`. This is also in preparation of adding a new
`Intrinsic::getDeclarati
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-webassembly
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
Rename the function to reflect its correct behavior and to be consistent with
`Module::getOrInsertFunction`. This is also in preparation of adding a new
`Intrinsic::getDeclaration` that will hav
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
Author: Rahul Joshi (jurahul)
Changes
Rename the function to reflect its correct behavior and to be consistent with
`Module::getOrInsertFunction`. This is also in preparation of adding a new
`Intrinsic::getDeclaration` that will have beh
https://github.com/jurahul ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4492,6 +4492,37 @@ void CXXNameMangler::mangleType(const ArrayParameterType
*T) {
mangleType(cast(T));
}
+void CXXNameMangler::mangleType(const HLSLAttributedResourceType *T) {
+ llvm::SmallString<64> Str("_Res");
+ const HLSLAttributedResourceType::Attributes &Attrs
https://github.com/pow2clk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110327
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -11533,6 +11539,18 @@ QualType ASTContext::mergeTypes(QualType LHS, QualType
RHS, bool OfBlockPointer,
return {};
return LHS;
}
+ case Type::HLSLAttributedResource: {
+const HLSLAttributedResourceType *LHSTy =
+LHS->castAs();
+const HLSLAttribut
@@ -4493,28 +4493,34 @@ void CXXNameMangler::mangleType(const
ArrayParameterType *T) {
}
void CXXNameMangler::mangleType(const HLSLAttributedResourceType *T) {
- mangleType(T->getWrappedType());
+ llvm::SmallString<64> Str("_Res");
const HLSLAttributedResourceType::Attri
@@ -4493,28 +4493,34 @@ void CXXNameMangler::mangleType(const
ArrayParameterType *T) {
}
void CXXNameMangler::mangleType(const HLSLAttributedResourceType *T) {
- mangleType(T->getWrappedType());
+ llvm::SmallString<64> Str("_Res");
const HLSLAttributedResourceType::Attri
https://github.com/pow2clk commented:
I'm a bit out of my depth here, but I've been trying to understand Itanium
mangling better and I think my suggestion to coalesce the vendor mangled
portions is valid at least.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110327
___
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-ppc64le-linux`
running on `ppc64le-sanitizer` while building `clang,llvm` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/72/builds/4173
Here is the relevant piece of t
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110435
>From c52634882631a71fad956a70179b480abf13006a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 22:01:38 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] fix overload resolution for object parameters
with
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109331
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -461,6 +479,27 @@ class OpLowerer {
});
}
+ [[nodiscard]] bool lowerSplitDouble(Function &F) {
+IRBuilder<> &IRB = OpBuilder.getIRB();
+return replaceFunction(F, [&](CallInst *CI) -> Error {
+ IRB.SetInsertPoint(CI);
+
+ Value *Arg0 = CI->getArgOper
https://github.com/kyulee-com closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90933
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kyungwoo Lee
Date: 2024-10-09T15:37:41-07:00
New Revision: dc85d5263ed5e416cb4ddf405611472f4ef12fd3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dc85d5263ed5e416cb4ddf405611472f4ef12fd3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dc85d5263ed5e416cb4ddf405611472f4ef12fd3.diff
kyulee-com wrote:
@teresajohnson Thank you for your review and valuable feedback!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90933
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 522 matches
Mail list logo
